UT alum

That’s it. Not, beyond the shadow of a doubt.

He had every chance to provide all the exculpatory evidence and testimony he wanted. He didn’t because he can’t.

[Hidden Content] circumstantial evidence can be enough to convict.

Do you not understand whistleblower laws?

Sure. But the circumstantial I’ve seen is overwhelming. I should have said answer his accusers.

Secret whistleblower is a redundancy. Trump will have due process at trial. If he has witnesses who can exonerate him, he can call them. He will have the right of cross-examination.

“What about” Holder? I don’t believe Washington was ever subpoenaed.

Accused does not have right to present witnesses in a Grand Jury proceeding.

Where’d you get that?

In American jurisprudence, if the accused doesn’t comply with subpoenas, they go to jail.

Whatever. Same scheisse, second verse, same as the first.

Can you cite any of those stimulating deregulations?

He would be destroying his way of life in the process.

That is a lie.

Not entirely. The White House refused both documents and testimony from relevant witnesses.

Opposite.

To be ensure a fair trial. Fair trials have witnesses and evidence. Impeachment hearings were not a trial.

HE CALLS HIMSELF ONE!

And Ari Fleischer is? Only time will tell what this all will bring.

Putin wants chaos to rule our political system. Who better than Trump. Russian oligarchs were his last refuge for capital after he’d burned all the banks, so they’re holding his notes. Pulling out of Iran deal strengthened Iran’s nuclear program. He has handed Syria back to Assad and his benefactor, Putin. I figure when they go into those private with no notes and only Putin’s translator they’re screwing each other. Front and back.

Bill Barr is nothing but a shill for Trump. Soros = Koch. Both parties have billionaires trying to influence elections. Of course, only the Republican Party is the victim. Republican Party = Party of Victim Hood.

Pulpit and Pen was the only source I could could find citing a Soros connection. They offered zero proof, only the claim. The other “sources” I could find were merely regurgitating what Pulpit and Pen “reported”. The only way Trump and his “base” can defend him is by attacking his critics. When that is the only defense, that means real exculpatory evidence does not exist. He can’t prove his innocence, so he systematically denigrates his accusers. Real tough guy. One thing he has taken over from the Democratic Party is the effective use of victim hood. Republicans have become the party of the victim, with its leader being Victim in Chief. Soros my ass. Soros claim = no evidence.

Not in my book. Does that mean you forfeit the right to compliment? Consciously not voting is mild form of civil disobedience, which I respect. I’ll honor your complaints without repudiation based on your electoral choice.

Seems to me, Aggie, that if you saw an “other side”, you’d vote, Your logic is sound to me and I respect your right to not vote.

Please explain what’s dumb about it.