UT alum

2007 percent was the proper interval, not 2008.

Yeah, but looking back, I’ve found myself better off after each 4 year interval as far back as I can remember, save 2008. Speaking for myself, America’s been great for as long as I’ve been alive.

In light of the emails turned up over the weekend, I’d say further questioning is warranted.

Politics. Setting that all aside for a moment, I do wish you and yours a Merry Christmas, Stevenash.

That’s why Mulvaney, Bolton, and the two OMB guys need to be heard. They were the most directly involved. If they say nothing, then it’s lights out and Trump is acquitted. I just want to see if they say nothing under oath.

Merry Christmas, NetCat!

Let’s set this all aside for a moment, like the combatants did on Christmas Day, 1914. Merry Christmas!

All that aside, Merry Christmas to you and your loved ones, BS Wildcats.

All that aside, LumRaiderFan, Merry Christmas!

All that aside, Baddog, Merry Christmas to you and yours.

That ain’t in the way the Constitution reads. Article I, sec.2, clause 5; Article l, sec. 3, clauses 6 & 7; Article 2, sec. 2; Article 2, sec. 4. That’s all that’s said in the Constitution about impeachment. Tell me how any of that puts a time constraint on delivery of the articles of impeachment.

I believe the Constitution says that the Senate shall have the power to try all impeachments. Don’t say jack about how the House has to go about delivering the articles, other than they be physically delivered to the Senate.

Direct testimony is not circumstantial.

He’s never been political in his adult life. He was a soldier, a prosecutor, and appointed FBI director by a Republican and re-appointed by a Democrat. Your hatred blinds you.

He will,at trial. I believe the Chief Justice will have a say about each witness’ relevance to the case.

He will, at trial. I believe the Chief Justice has a say in the witness’ relevance to the case.

Let us hear from Mulvaney, Bolton, Giuliani, hell, young Biden for that matter. Why clam up if you’re innocent? I believe I’ve heard trump speak quite disparagingly about those who take the fifth.

Mueller said if he could have reasonably declared the president broke no law, he would have said it. He didn’t.

Murder is beyond shadow of doubt.

That’s it. Not, beyond the shadow of a doubt.

He had every chance to provide all the exculpatory evidence and testimony he wanted. He didn’t because he can’t.

[Hidden Content] circumstantial evidence can be enough to convict.

Do you not understand whistleblower laws?

Sure. But the circumstantial I’ve seen is overwhelming. I should have said answer his accusers.

Secret whistleblower is a redundancy. Trump will have due process at trial. If he has witnesses who can exonerate him, he can call them. He will have the right of cross-examination.