89Falcon

Carthage was competitive long before Suratt arrived and he has done a great job of transforming a perennial winner to a perennial state champion. He also benefitted from the watering down of the classifications. Huntington has never had a single winning season in school history. There is not a single chance in hell that he would do the same at Huntington. **I suspect you are being silly at this point. I dont believe that you believe what you are saying.

He would have an overwhelming losing record.

Will be a good one for WOS. Game will not be competitive. WOS will be able to name their score.

He would not win at "Huntington" or "Tarkington".

There is an unlimited number of examples with coaches "winning with good players, losing with bad players". Is Bill Belichick a good coach? He seems to be struggling at NC and ultimately flamed out in NE after he lost certain players. There is another saying that 1000+ famous coaches have made as well (since you like quotes): "It is about Jimmies and Joes, not Xs and Os".

Vidor coaching staff is one of the best. Multiple high-quality coaches. Coaching has not been the issue at Vidor.

Good deal. Thank you for self-correcting.

QBs are, you might want to check on the going rates for different positions at the P4 level. And there is a big difference between the world of "La Tech" and "Baylor". One of them is in a P4 conference. Comparing La Tech with Baylor is silly and not adult conversation.

“Playing for La Tech” does not override “1 million dollars at Baylor”. And no, a degree at La Tech is not “the same as Baylor”. Might be one of the more ridiculous things I have heard in this forum. **Also, no reason to think he will not play at Baylor.

LOL. He would be "better off" getting "LA Tech degree" than getting a million $$ and a "Baylor degree". LOL!!!!!

Read my last sentence in the comment you quoted.

Everyone knows that the little league coaches are the power brokers regarding football in Woodville.

The release authorizes the new employer to conduct a background check. It does not release a "former employer" to say things that are confidential outside of what was identified. In the event that a former employer provides unsubstantiated (rumor based or opinion) information that prevents a person from getting hired there is exposure regardless of any signed document.

For clarification: schools run a background check from the DPS database. If that comes back "clear", the school check references. Former employers are only technically allowed to provide 1. dates of employment 2. eligible for rehire yes/no 3. they may also provide safety info for DOT sensitive positions. Anything beyond the above listed information can expose the former employer to legal trouble. If they reveal unsubstantiated or unverified rumor type information that prevents a former employee from being hired, they can be subject to lawsuits.

A kid growing up and playing sports in Shepherd is typically not considered “Coldspring best players moving to Shepherd” just because the parents are from Coldspring. There is not a school in the state where many parents grew up somewhere else. There are currently no players in Shepherd that were formerly one of “Coldspring best players”. Coldspring does/has had difference makers walking the halls who do not play sports.