Jump to content

89Falcon

Members
  • Posts

    1,639
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

89Falcon last won the day on April 4

89Falcon had the most liked content!

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Yep, I had that in mind. Was an easy example to disprove the previous point
  2. Understanding the record and variables associated, would you say WOS is better/worse/same as last year?
  3. Hearing Tarkington is a likely drop down.
  4. D1 players make D1 regardless of the high school position they play or the style of offense/defense. Could make an endless list of examples.
  5. Has PNG been similar to Vidor in terms of talent?
  6. Understood, for every coaching change that worked there is one that didn’t work. Vidor will remain in a state where they can be competitive on occasion but will be mediocre to bad most years and it will not matter who is the coach. You are not alone in your logic. Stands are full of folks who believe the same. Coldspring, Woodville and others all wanted new coaches to “energize” the programs with new innovative offenses.
  7. Got it. You are just speculating how you "wish it could be", not really knowing the talent level in comparison to the competition.
  8. Will be interesting to see how it looks for Hardin in 2026. 😉
  9. Who do you think they would beat if they were currently "energized"?
  10. Which teams do you think Vidor should be beating? if they were "energized"?
  11. The coaches there now are good coaches.
  12. Vidor is definitely “historically horrible”. That is not debatable and it is not because there has never been good coaches in Vidor.
  13. Did they see the coaching change at other schools also? I doubt they know much about any of those schools. Vidor is historically horrible regardless of the coaching. The greatest were able to make Vidor competitive to mediocre on occasion.
  14. Not many teams that rely on sophomores win a lot of games.
×
×
  • Create New...