Setx fan

Of course and sometimes a couple plays within seconds of those 4 quarters can change the whole outlook of the game. Sometimes in matchups where that happens those 2 teams can play again and get a totally different result. Then you have matchups where one team dominates the majority of the downs on both sides of the ball. Those teams can probably play several times and get the same result because one team is "outclassed" by the other.

Just because everybody is saying it doesn't make it true. Majority of people never thought Woodville would get there in the first place and we all know that was wrong now. Score was 7-0 at halftime before Gunter created more seperation with a couple kick returns second half.

Not true at all.

It's life. People have opinions. If he can't deal with it then he done the right thing. Maybe people won't have opinions in Crawford. Nobody put a gun to his head and told him to leave but nobody's holding him hostage neither. Good luck to him

Last year wasn't bad at all. I don't expect we should totally get away from what we did last year. But some things could be done better and hopefully that's what we'll be working towards this upcoming year

Everyone can't do what Franklin does. Different teams have different constructs. A balanced approach is probably best for Woodville. And it helps to be able to tweak it a little bit depending on the opponents strengths and weaknesses. We have players that can hurt you in different ways and we need a coach who realizes that and knows how to utilize it

Hodges from Shiro?

Sutherland? Neece?

Game really would have been closer if it wasn't for a couple breakdowns on special teams coverage. There wasn't as big of a talent gap as people are trying to make it seem.

Woodville has plenty more great seasons to come. Hopefully we'll get another look at Gunter in the upcoming years

Your definitely right. I don't know what's going on through the headsets at all. But it looked like we basically had the same gameplan throughout the year regardless of who we were playing. Only thing that changed in the playoffs was Tay started getting more touches and by the time we got to Arlington, Gunter had plenty film on him.

A couple offensive adjustments probably would have got us a score or 2. Those scores might have shifted the momentum of the game. That's what shifted the momentum the game before except it was a defensive score

Your talking about Luke?

Yea we can definitely use a more offensive minded coach but we still want to make sure we don't get away from the toughness and things like that which Coach Rob helped instill which contributed to becoming a winning program

Obviously. But I think it might work out better for our program and for him over at Crawford as well. He's been great for our program but it's probably just time to part ways

You might have to be aware of what we got coming up at Woodville to understand where I'm coming from

Interesting. Late in the 3rd quarter with zero on the scoreboard in the state game you should be willing to make some adjustments

There's probably many different variables but the main reason I've heard is family and location. Or maybe Rob agrees with LionPride who thinks it's a step up. Who knows

I think there's probably some better options out there than him but if you're right I think I'd probably rather just keep it in house at least temporarily for now

I'm sure Rob will do a good job over there but yep that's probably what he has in mind 🤣 That's the style he likes to coach and might be part of the reason he wanted to go there

Yea Crawford is "historically" a really good "2A" program but they're 9-14 and haven't made it past the 2nd round in "2A" playoffs the last 2 years. That's not a step up.

I would assume they should be unless they know something I don't

His resume is no good plus he left after only 2 seasons last time. That's not what we need

I don't know what for

I'm sure there will be at least a couple guys off the coaching staff that stay. Rob may take a couple with him though. Anxious to see the options we're looking at