Setx fan

You watch too much Fox News. Yes a lot of organizations have attached themselves to the movement with their own agendas but that doesn’t change the overall concept of the movement. Exactly what is a Marxist?

Anything conservative is legit to you and anything else is communist. lol

You don’t have to prove anything or tear down anything. Just don’t attempt to tear down the movement and don’t support movements created in opposition of the movement.

Ultimately only you and God know. But far as how I form my opinion I allready explained that.

Every MOVEMENT AGAINST THE MOVEMENT. I said nothing about disagreeing with acts within the movement. I said something about supporting MOVEMENTS OPPOSED TO THE MOVEMENT

Offensiveness it’s not judged by skintone at all. It’s judged by intentions. There’s an old cliche saying “words don’t have meaning, people do.” That’s all I’m saying. We all know that around the time of the civil rights movement it became less acceptable for white supremist to openly express how they feel about “coloreds”. Those people began to practice speaking with undertones. Saying how they feel without actually saying it. That’s where a lot of these opposing phrases come from

Because you don’t agree with some of the actions taking place within the movement doesn’t make you racist at all. Hell there’s a lot of things within the movement I don’t agree with lol

If you make it to seem simple as just words (nouns and pronouns) then they’re very much the same. But we both know it’s much deeper than that. You not wanting to think about or discuss the origin and intention of these phrases comes across to me as if your trying to hide from the truth. I have no problem with you being proud of your whiteness but its more to it than that and you know it

Not looking to prove anything but your right I do believe they’re different. Doesn’t mean I can’t be wrong. If I’m wrong I was hoping you could explain how I’m wrong. But you gave me affirmation that I’m probably right with how you handled my question. Everything made in opposition against a movement against oppression supports oppression in my opinion. All those other phrases you listed are examples

So you won’t answer my questions?

I don’t think either phrase is really necessary at this point but to push the narrative that these 2 phrases are of the same nature is misleading in my opinion but I could be wrong. Around what time did each phrase become popular? What was the original intent for each phrase?

The virus can’t spread if people aren’t moving. I agree we must get back to normal at some point but the best way to do that in my opinion is a very strict lockdown for 1 or 2 months. Sounds crazy but I think we need to go ahead and get it over with. After we get the numbers down really low just focus on making sure the people who have tested positive are not going out in public and letting everyone else live their normal lives. If that doesn’t work than screw it at that point because I don’t want to wear a mask in public for the rest of my life.

You’d be surprised about these guys. The main ones who won’t bust a grape are the main ones who get themselves in these situations.

Exactly. No way someone starts punching on me for no reason and I’m not fighting back with every ounce of strength in my veins. I’m dang sure not gne be sorry about nothing. That’s very weird to me

Yea attacking an old person that way is pretty much attempted murder. But we still don’t know if it’s completely unprovoked. These videos are so short and half of them have no sound

I never said any of them were except Aubury and that’s proven although Georgia has no hate crime law. Now there is systemic racism in place to where a lot of people can get away with crimes against blacks rather the actual crime is racially motivated or not.

Doesn’t mean it wasn’t provoked at all because it wasn’t a racial slur but maybe it wasn’t. I’m just saying I have a hard time believing that because he’s so “sorry” in addition to the fact that I’ve just never seen anyone just walk in a store and randomly attack someone without being provoked. Rather he was provoked or not he should be punished if he wasn’t physically threatened. If it was truly completely unprovoked then a hate crime could be considered.

I don’t know.

In which instance?

Hate crime? I don’t believe you should be violent unless you are physically threatened and being that the attacker doesn’t look like he was being physically threatened I think he should be punished for this senseless violence. But I highly doubt this was a hate crime and I have a hard time believing this act was completely unprovoked. The victim is obviously very “sorry” about something. He probably did something or made some sly remark. He wasn’t just picked out because of his race

Sadly in the end this may be proven legally although the dang video proves otherwise, smh. The system is broken

Son of God

Revelations 1:14-15 is the only physical description I’m aware of but your right. His flesh wasn’t important. It’s the spirit of The Most High that was within him that makes him the Son oh God.

Agreed can’t be 100 percent sure because we weren’t there. Just based off your initial response to my statement I thought I should probably throw some pointers out there so you could understand how I come up with my ideal. I don’t mind being wrong sometimes but I don’t want people thinking I’m completely nutz either lol

Northern Africa TODAY is people of Middle Eastern descent. It’s been a lot of shuffling around since the Bible days. Egypt for one was made up of dark skinned people. You have to look at history from different angles especially going that far back.