Unwoke

😘

Hey You know what he’s talking about. edited for content

.

Wrong again One question. What does the Constitution say about who changes states voting laws?

As usual you like to speak in half truths and twist facts which basically means you’re a COWARDLY LIAR. You failed to mention the Electoral Reform Act that was crammed into a 4,000 page spending law back in January of this year that dealt with the Vice President’s role in counting the electoral votes. What’s in play now was not in play on J6 2020. Reason they changed is because the Vice President did have the power to kick electoral votes back to the state legislatures when there was irregularities or wrongdoing that needed to be addressed. It’s amazing that you didn’t have a problem at all of the Democrats taking 3 years to bludgeon Trump in a Fake Russia Hoax Investigation that they knew was fake the whole time but you expect states to have a investigation wrapped up in 2 months because of the massive voter fraud and election interference. You have zero credibility and no sense at all to have that type of mindset. But you do expect from 24/7. Lol Days before the end of the 117th Congress, an omnibus appropriations bill was signed by President Joe Biden. Included in that 4,000-page spending law was the Electoral Count Reform and Presidential Transition Improvement Act of 2022, or ECRA. Hammered out by lawmakers including Sens. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) and Susan Collins (R-Maine), this bipartisan legislation is intended to provide better guardrails to govern how presidential election results get from the states to the Electoral College process and then to Congress, and how Congress handles them once there. According to many, the Electoral Count Act of 1887 was overdue for an overhaul because it did not offer clear guidance on counting electoral votes or how to resolve possible disputes. (History buffs will note that in 1887 Congress created the ECA specifically to preclude problems such as those that arose in the 1876 presidential election of Rutherford B. Hayes from happening again.) While legal scholars and politicos have been sounding the alarm for decades that the ECA’s antiquated language was imprecise on the vice president’s role, among other things, most Americans didn’t think twice about the mechanics of selecting a president until 2020. That’s when the nation learned the ECA was open to interpretation, and efforts to clarify its meaning gained steam. The new law mainly addresses what Congress does after electors are sent forward from the states. It creates a new threshold for members to object to a slate of electors (one-fifth of the members of both the House and the Senate), identifies the role of the vice president as “solely ministerial” and clarifies that Congress must defer to the slates as determined by the states. It also addresses the states’ side of the equation. It codifies that the executive of each state sends forward the state’s slate of electors. The law indicates that, in this context, “the executive” is usually a governor. But if state law in effect prior to the election explicitly identifies another officer, such as the secretary of state, that works as well—the law simply requires certainty before the election. Additionally, it requires some kind of “security feature” on the certificate of ascertainment (the official document identifying a state’s appointed electors), again as determined by the state before the election. The goal is to be sure that the right slate—and only that slate—is transmitted. The law also clarifies that electors shall be appointed “in accordance with the laws of the State enacted prior to election day.” A state can’t change the rules after the voting ends.

Your comparison is doesn’t even come close. Nice try. Very creative. Lol

That’s your interpretation. Other constitutional scholars would disagree with you. Copy and paste the AP all you want Bro. Lol The difficulty was that the existing slates of electors had not been certified after an election conducted “pursuant to [the states’] own laws.” Pence was simply being asked to provide the state legislatures in the contested states with the time necessary to properly assess the legitimacy of their electoral votes. The Constitution says only State Legislatures can change voting laws, Non legislative actors cannot. And that’s what happened in those states in those states. There’s no exception in the Constitution for fake pandemics. 😘

I’m confused, is that WOS’s new coach? 😁

The reason you didn’t know that is because it didn’t happen. CB is a cowardly liar who likes to twist the truth. But yet you swallow his BS hook, line, and sinker which is not surprising because you want it to be oh so true. What’s dangerous is ignorant individuals like you that are too lazy to actually look into the truth but vote believing that nonsense that is spewed by ignorant people like CB. The vice president was not being asked to decide the matter himself, but to pause the proceedings long enough to give the couple of states whose legislators had asked for more time to assess whether the illegal conduct by their state election officials—illegal conduct that Pence himself twice acknowledged in his statement—was sufficient to warrant revoking the existing certification and submitting a new one that accurately reflected the state’s vote, just as Hawaii had done in 1960. Pence was thus being asked to let the matter be resolved by the State Legislatures. It is the states that choose the president, and the Constitution gives them sovereign authority over the disposition of their electoral votes. There is no federal check—not Congress, not the vice president—over how the states, pursuant to their own laws, certify the elections they conduct and the electors they appoint to cast their electoral votes. The difficulty was that the existing slates of electors had not been certified after an election conducted “pursuant to [the states’] own laws.” Pence was simply being asked to provide the state legislatures in the contested states with the time necessary to properly assess the legitimacy of their electoral votes.

Your a liar and very good a twisting the truth. The vice president was not being asked to decide the matter himself, but to pause the proceedings long enough to give the couple of states whose legislators had asked for more time to assess whether the illegal conduct by their state election officials—illegal conduct that Pence himself twice acknowledged in his statement—was sufficient to warrant revoking the existing certification and submitting a new one that accurately reflected the state’s vote, just as Hawaii had done in 1960. Pence was thus being asked to let the matter be resolved by the State Legislatures. It is the states that choose the president, and the Constitution gives them sovereign authority over the disposition of their electoral votes. There is no federal check—not Congress, not the vice president—over how the states, pursuant to their own laws, certify the elections they conduct and the electors they appoint to cast their electoral votes. The difficulty was that the existing slates of electors had not been certified after an election conducted “pursuant to [the states’] own laws.” Pence was simply being asked to provide the state legislatures in the contested states with the time necessary to properly assess the legitimacy of their electoral votes.

Proof that you can indict a ham sandwich. This is nothing more than political Lawfare to create election interference and politically bludgeon Trump during his presidential campaign. This sets a very dangerous precedent going forward if it is allowed to stand. This 💩 has been going on since 2015 an is just ridiculous but the crazy thing about it is the left Nutz on this site are too blind and ignorant to see it. When all is said in done Trump will end up suing everyone of the POS involved in this witch hunt an I don’t blame him.

What the left sack of Nutz on this forum need to realize is The First Amendment doesn't just include a right to freedom of speech. It also includes a right to petition the government for redress of grievances. Now, Jack Smith wants to criminalize the act of contesting an election through the courts and by lobbying legislators. Every step of this indictment is a war on the Constitution.

No doubt

It’s the craziest thing this interview between Tucker Carlson and the Chief of the Capitol Police on J6 didn’t get to air before Fox fired Tucker. Read it an you’ll know why. Have no fear though Tucker will interview him again.

It’s the craziest thing….

Says the guy who took an unknown vaccine made in 9 months which normally takes 12 to 15 years to make based on a business decision. Even a Monkey would know there’s no rationale in that decision. A business decision 😂 Truth be known it wasn’t a business decision it was based on Fear. I have in laws that took it but they didn’t take it based on a business decision. Most likely it was based on fear just like YOU. You do nothing but regurgitate propaganda. Everyday of the week and twice on Sunday! Trump 2024🇺🇸

You make no sense which is not uncommon. You obviously didn’t watch the whole clip. I don’t even know WTH you’re even talking about. Your laziness is Unfreaking believable. The video is all about Fulton county Georgia. The one you like to bring up all the time. The fraud there was ridiculous.

Here’s your Fulton County Georgia Evidence you constantly cry about. Watch the whole thing to the end if you’re not too lazy to do so. This crap happened in many other states but your to busy watching the Cardinal News Network to actually know what happened. You obviously took many semesters on being wrong all the time too. 😂 Reuters.com is your source? Lol The same sight that was pushing the vaccine!! Did Reuters help you make your business decision to get the vaccine? 24/7 Ignorant

This what happens to you in a small town when you steal! Spank that A$$!😂🤣

Tangible evidence!😂🤣🤣😂🤣😂 The Republican Party needed an overhaul. Too many Democrats running as Republicans for the last 30 years. I bet you have about 2 dozen of flies flying around your mouth about right now with all the 💩 flying out it. Yeah…no evidence or mathematically impossible irregularities. 🤡🌎 This is just a small sample of the 💩 going on on election night.

Just so you know ... The Republican Party wants to get rid of Trump just as much as the Democrat Party. That way they can try to install another uniparty neocon Bush Republican scumbag and get back to their corrupt uniparty business as usual. Its not hard to see.