Oh, yeah, this Superintendent should be fired and a hefty lawsuit should be layed on the school district. From the article: "Revere Superintendent Dianne Kelly says the district believes in freedom of speech, but cannot support what she calls insensitive language. "If you're going to stand up and say something that other people will find offensive - than you need to be prepare to deal with the ramifications of that," Kelly said." The Constitution PROTECTS offensive speech. You notice there's a BUT behind the "district believes in freedom of speech." Doesn't appear that they actually do. But -- was this offensive speech to begin with? It appears that this Superintendent doesn't understand the Constitution. Maybe firing her will wake her and the school district up... [Hidden Content]