smitty

Right or wrong?   [Hidden Content]

Anyone think there's a bigger picture here?   [Hidden Content]

You may be right.  But it looks awful fishy. 

This is the same bunch that indicted Tom Delay.  Delay was later acquitted of all charges.  This sounds like a second political witch hunt!  Thoughts?

Another take on the Ferguson riots...   [Hidden Content]

I'll have to check, but isn't this the same bunch that targeted Tom Delay to take him down a notch?  I'll check further...

More pics...   [Hidden Content]

No, you are right.  But, why hasn't the media shown this picture?  Just curious.

Haven't seen this picture on the main stream media.  Has anyone seen this there?   [Hidden Content]

Is this the kid that was shot?  I doubt any here has seen this photo.  It was also reported that he was involved in a robbery.    [Hidden Content]

Interesting.  Do I think he's a muslim?  No.  Do I think he is highly sympathetic to them?  Yes.  Why?  Because his father was a communist muslim.  So, why wouldn't he be?  Remember his book, Dreams Of My Father?!! 

Low Information Voter is NOT a cut down!  Just think about it for second.  If it was, I would not use it.  Show me where I have gotten involved in name calling any where else!! 

Amazing, isn't it!

Well there's more to it.  If anything I have posted is wrong, prove it.  That's where discussions are started.  But I post stuff that I feel I can rely on.  PS -- Thanks for the compliments...

Appearances can be deserving.  I've tried to post things that the left leaning media will not talk about that the left leaners here was not going to see.  But they were true non the less.  Now -- if that ticks people off, then so be it.  I'll assure it was not my intention.  I never got into the goofy discussions.  Now THAT was intentional for reasons I described earlier.

Actually I wanted your opinion on a post I started, "Ferguson Looting."  But you never said anything.    :)

With one exception - smitty never got in pissing match with anyone.  My name was brought many times but I was NEVER part of the conversations.  Like I said in my previous post, give them enough rope...    ;)    But you are right --the name change tells the tale! 

Attaboy!

I'm trying to get an understanding.  What is there to knock off? 

And the problem is?

What's wrong with Low Information Voter? 

What part do you take exception with?  All one has to do is connect the dots!

Why, you feel the video is altered? 

Personally I say it's much, much more than that.  But, since the politicians have to put on a happy face this is what's reported.  Also, the US deficit grew another $95 Billion in July, 2014...   [Hidden Content]

For the record -- Low Information Voters is not a cut down.  Was seeing if anyone on the left could connect the dots.  I don't think they ever have concerning this.  LOL!  Hence, I've said before that what I post is for educational purposes to lift the Low Information Voter.  My opinion is that the majority of those that voted for obama didn't have the information necessary to make an "informed" decision.  If a discussion ensues, then great.  If not, then great.  But, let's be honest:  Which side starts the name calling??  Seems like that is who needs to be dealt with.  Yes -- this is a political forum.  The other side has given plenty to expose.  When the other side couldn't handle the truth when exposed they went to name calling.  I can't speak for the others on the right, but I never once got into the name calling.  Didn't need to.  But I knew the other side would start it. They always do.  My name was always brought up but I never got into these discussions.  That was intentional.  You know the old saying, give um enough rope.  And they usually passed with flying colors.  I say don't delete the forum but police the individuals that need to be policed!!  Again -- just my opinion...