Gasilla

OK... so it was 14 instead of 21... and you NEVER admitted you made that prediction, not one time. If you did, go back and copy and paste where you admitted it with the date! The only thing you admitted was some prediction on a Dayton game that wasn't even relevent. It ain't in there, pal. But, yo,u do have my copy and paste where you claimed you never made a prediction, but the prediction, with the date, is right underneath it. How do you explain that, blowhard? No, you got called out and your feelings are hurt. Now, you are just plain making crap up. ;) Now, I did accuse you of deleting it because I couldn't find it. I apologized for that. Heck, I'll even apologize for getting the score wrong, too. See, I can be a sweet guy. ;D

[quote name="fwstangs" post="834753" timestamp="1283140115"] simply stated that I think my team will win! [/quote] [quote author=fwstangs link=topic=71184.msg834753#msg834753 date=1283140115] Re: west orange stark @ friendswood « Reply #76 on: July 27, 2010, 10:30:46 AM » Quote  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I am thinking FW by 14.[/quote] There it is... the contradiction I was talking about. Now, I will apologize for accusing you of deleting it. It was back further than I thought. But it was there none the less and the reason you weren't going to get an apology before when I knew you had said it even though you were denying it.

[quote name="fwstangs" post="836188" timestamp="1283312048"] [quote author=Gasilla link=topic=72303.msg836174#msg836174 date=1283311117] [quote author=fwstangs link=topic=72303.msg836129#msg836129 date=1283308545] [quote author=panamamyers link=topic=72303.msg836118#msg836118 date=1283308147] Book it. [/quote] OMG - you cocky arrogant WOS fan! Oh my bad, we only say that to FW fans when they make a prediction. You expect a lot of points. I predict 42-28 FW. Despite what Gassy thinks, I have only predicted a 14 point win, and I am sticking to it!! Should be fun, see ya Friday. [/quote] Dude, do you REALLY want to keep this going?????? [/quote] Sarcasm Gassy, sarcasm. You should be very familiar with it!! Plenty of  ;D ;D ;D [/quote] Wow! Straight over your head... LOL Panama... this getting old man. I'm not gonna bite anymore. Sorry, I know it's entertaining you and all, but it's gettin old. Even for me... :D

[quote name="fwstangs" post="836182" timestamp="1283311581"] [quote author=Gasilla link=topic=71184.msg836169#msg836169 date=1283310671] [quote author=fwstangs link=topic=71184.msg836146#msg836146 date=1283309345] [quote author=Gasilla link=topic=71184.msg836073#msg836073 date=1283305056] fwstangs... this is getting pretty remedial... the reason this whole thing got started is because you guys come onto this thread talking about how you were going to win big, which is cool. You gave your reasons for why you felt you would win; your size, your depth and the return of your QB. That is all good too... where you drew my wrath and got me on you was when someone made mention of our speed, which IS one of our assets, and you guys blew a fuse and started mocking him for saying it (and it wasn't me, even though you have falsely accused me of it a couple of times). Then you start trying to compare our speed to Angleton and making fun of the people who mentioned it. I'm not going to sit back and watch that crap especially when your comparisons are flawed. Now, after I got on you, you changed your tone a bit and started giving us compliments, but the ball was rolling by then. You want to come here and make predictions and give your reasons why you feel that way? Cool! But don't give your reasons and then ridicule others because they feel differently and give their opinions. You also said I feel like WOS will win... I've never said anything like that. However, knowing football and a little more about FW now, I know it is going to be extremely tough for my Stangs. They will have to play extremely well to win this game. I think we are going to match up better with FW than you people think (and it's ALL about the match up's, baby! ;)). I know that Friendswood will be bigger than us, I know they will have more depth than we will, and unless you don't follow football past the school you support, then you know about Maetzold (I think that's how you spell it). I also know we WILL have more speed than FW. Now you can argue, censored, piss and moan all you want about that. But it's true whether you like it or not. If our DB's are faster than your WR's and can do a good enough job covering them man to man. Then that will enable us to bring more rushers than your line can block. If that happens then, yes, you could be in trouble. That's not me picking the team I support just because I support them. That's just football... ;) [/quote] Never changed my tone fiction writer, you just chose to read some of the posts, but I expect that from you now. You also accuse people of things and will not admit when you are wrong. In the end, you just made all of the same points I have made, perhaps your best post, glad you take feedback well and improved. So it is ok if you say we are bigger, have more depth and have a good QB. But if we say it, we are arrogant. Facts are facts jack. In addition, I never said we were faster! PS - if you knew how many times we have heard that speed and athleticism is a problem for FW, you would understand the mocking. And we have beaten many of the teams that stuffed that in our face. Does not mean we will beat yall.  But then again that would require you to know something besides the team you follow. Another point for you, no matter how good and fast your DB's are, and they are both, if the QB has 4-5 seconds to throw, no one can cover that long. We shall see. PS - I am sticking with 14, which is what I always said! PS - thats what these boards are for, making predictions and explaining your logic.If you are mad at someone for doing that, stay off the boards. And one last thing - so my comparision of Angletons speed being at a higher level than yours is flawed - for your infor - they won the 4x100 state title in 4a. They are fast fella! See ya and I am thru with you, others are bored with this exchange. [/quote] It's TRULY funny that you talk about my reading and you TOTALLY misread my post... CLASSIC! Also, you know as well as I do that you went back and deleted that post because you knew you had contradicted yourself. There is no trace of it now, but you and I know... ;) Oh, and WOS won the TRACK state title... But wait, that doesn't matter because when you have 4.39 seconds to throw and you have 6'9" lineman that weigh 396 lbs... blah blah freakin blah! Save it! Can't wait for Friday!! [/quote] Gasilla is convinced I removed a thread, the one where I predicted that some one would get manhandled and lose by "21, I think" . Someone even gave me grief for my joking , I think. Now you see him calling me out and calling me a liar. Just wanted folks to know who we are dealing with, refuses to admit he is wrong. Is there a way to totally remove a thread?? He thinks I worked that Magic. PS not only did WOS win the state meet, they won the 4x100 in a time that was olny a .2 slower than Angleton and in fact their season best was .2 better than Angleton, so they are both very fast teams!! [/quote] I don't think, I know you deleted it. And it wasn't a whole thread it was a post and yes you can delete your own post (but you know that). I love how you cover your tracks by acting like you don't know how to do it. Nice! How many of the 4X100 Angleton team are on this years football team? There are at least 5 from the WOS track team.

[quote name="fwstangs" post="836167" timestamp="1283310656"] [quote author=Gasilla link=topic=71184.msg836158#msg836158 date=1283309948] [quote author=rjn75 link=topic=71184.msg836106#msg836106 date=1283307296] I have been one of the fW fans arguing the claims made by wow fans that say wos is faster.  I believe that if we are talking pure speed yes wos is faster, I can agree with that.  FW may not have speed to burn at the wide out position but they don't need it to be effective.  They get the job done because they are good at creating seperation with precise routes, well coached offensive scheme,intelligence, and depth at the position.  They can throw 4 to five guys out there that can makes plays.  Their RB is also dynamic and is equally effective coming out of the backfield and catching the ball.  Like I've mentioned before they play faster teams regularly so nothing new.  They haven't been successful by going out there with mentality that they will blow by everyone.  Its done with good coaching and out executing teams. [/quote] Dude, why are you still trying to convince??? We are not saying the speed is going to beat you. Obviously, football is much more than just speed. It's also more than just about size and depth. They are all factors that help a team, but none are a deciding factor (they can be, but you don't know until the game is played). I don't get why you can talk about how big and how much depth you have and it's OK, but someone mentions speed and you short circuit. No one is saying your gonna lose because you have less speed, man. [/quote] Another great post - thanks for saying the same thing I have been saying. Glad you posted with speed in context. Good night. Do not short circuit when I say we are bigger and have more depth, does not mean we will win, just characteristics of our team!! [/quote] LOL... I never did until you did. In fact, no one did until you did. But I can go back and get the ones where you (or your boys) have in the beginning.

[quote name="fwstangs" post="836129" timestamp="1283308545"] [quote author=panamamyers link=topic=72303.msg836118#msg836118 date=1283308147] Book it. [/quote] OMG - you cocky arrogant WOS fan! Oh my bad, we only say that to FW fans when they make a prediction. You expect a lot of points. I predict 42-28 FW. Despite what Gassy thinks, I have only predicted a 14 point win, and I am sticking to it!! Should be fun, see ya Friday. [/quote] Dude, do you REALLY want to keep this going??????

[quote name="fwstangs" post="836146" timestamp="1283309345"] [quote author=Gasilla link=topic=71184.msg836073#msg836073 date=1283305056] fwstangs... this is getting pretty remedial... the reason this whole thing got started is because you guys come onto this thread talking about how you were going to win big, which is cool. You gave your reasons for why you felt you would win; your size, your depth and the return of your QB. That is all good too... where you drew my wrath and got me on you was when someone made mention of our speed, which IS one of our assets, and you guys blew a fuse and started mocking him for saying it (and it wasn't me, even though you have falsely accused me of it a couple of times). Then you start trying to compare our speed to Angleton and making fun of the people who mentioned it. I'm not going to sit back and watch that crap especially when your comparisons are flawed. Now, after I got on you, you changed your tone a bit and started giving us compliments, but the ball was rolling by then. You want to come here and make predictions and give your reasons why you feel that way? Cool! But don't give your reasons and then ridicule others because they feel differently and give their opinions. You also said I feel like WOS will win... I've never said anything like that. However, knowing football and a little more about FW now, I know it is going to be extremely tough for my Stangs. They will have to play extremely well to win this game. I think we are going to match up better with FW than you people think (and it's ALL about the match up's, baby! ;)). I know that Friendswood will be bigger than us, I know they will have more depth than we will, and unless you don't follow football past the school you support, then you know about Maetzold (I think that's how you spell it). I also know we WILL have more speed than FW. Now you can argue, censored, piss and moan all you want about that. But it's true whether you like it or not. If our DB's are faster than your WR's and can do a good enough job covering them man to man. Then that will enable us to bring more rushers than your line can block. If that happens then, yes, you could be in trouble. That's not me picking the team I support just because I support them. That's just football... ;) [/quote] Never changed my tone fiction writer, you just chose to read some of the posts, but I expect that from you now. You also accuse people of things and will not admit when you are wrong. In the end, you just made all of the same points I have made, perhaps your best post, glad you take feedback well and improved. So it is ok if you say we are bigger, have more depth and have a good QB. But if we say it, we are arrogant. Facts are facts jack. In addition, I never said we were faster! PS - if you knew how many times we have heard that speed and athleticism is a problem for FW, you would understand the mocking. And we have beaten many of the teams that stuffed that in our face. Does not mean we will beat yall.  But then again that would require you to know something besides the team you follow. Another point for you, no matter how good and fast your DB's are, and they are both, if the QB has 4-5 seconds to throw, no one can cover that long. We shall see. PS - I am sticking with 14, which is what I always said! PS - thats what these boards are for, making predictions and explaining your logic.If you are mad at someone for doing that, stay off the boards. And one last thing - so my comparision of Angletons speed being at a higher level than yours is flawed - for your infor - they won the 4x100 state title in 4a. They are fast fella! See ya and I am thru with you, others are bored with this exchange. [/quote] It's TRULY funny that you talk about my reading and you TOTALLY misread my post... CLASSIC! Also, you know as well as I do that you went back and deleted that post because you knew you had contradicted yourself. There is no trace of it now, but you and I know... ;) Oh, and WOS won the TRACK state title... But wait, that doesn't matter because when you have 4.39 seconds to throw and you have 6'9" lineman that weigh 396 lbs... blah blah freakin blah! Save it! Can't wait for Friday!!

[quote name="rjn75" post="836106" timestamp="1283307296"] I have been one of the fW fans arguing the claims made by wow fans that say wos is faster.  I believe that if we are talking pure speed yes wos is faster, I can agree with that.  FW may not have speed to burn at the wide out position but they don't need it to be effective.  They get the job done because they are good at creating seperation with precise routes, well coached offensive scheme,intelligence, and depth at the position.  They can throw 4 to five guys out there that can makes plays.  Their RB is also dynamic and is equally effective coming out of the backfield and catching the ball.  Like I've mentioned before they play faster teams regularly so nothing new.  They haven't been successful by going out there with mentality that they will blow by everyone.  Its done with good coaching and out executing teams. [/quote] Dude, why are you still trying to convince??? We are not saying the speed is going to beat you. Obviously, football is much more than just speed. It's also more than just about size and depth. They are all factors that help a team, but none are a deciding factor (they can be, but you don't know until the game is played). I don't get why you can talk about how big and how much depth you have and it's OK, but someone mentions speed and you short circuit. No one is saying your gonna lose because you have less speed, man.

In! White boy!

fwstangs... this is getting pretty remedial... the reason this whole thing got started is because you guys come onto this thread talking about how you were going to win big, which is cool. You gave your reasons for why you felt you would win; your size, your depth and the return of your QB. That is all good too... where you drew my wrath and got me on you was when someone made mention of our speed, which IS one of our assets, and you guys blew a fuse and started mocking him for saying it (and it wasn't me, even though you have falsely accused me of it a couple of times). Then you start trying to compare our speed to Angleton and making fun of the people who mentioned it. I'm not going to sit back and watch that crap especially when your comparisons are flawed. Now, after I got on you, you changed your tone a bit and started giving us compliments, but the ball was rolling by then. You want to come here and make predictions and give your reasons why you feel that way? Cool! But don't give your reasons and then ridicule others because they feel differently and give their opinions. You also said I feel like WOS will win... I've never said anything like that. However, knowing football and a little more about FW now, I know it is going to be extremely tough for my Stangs. They will have to play extremely well to win this game. I think we are going to match up better with FW than you people think (and it's ALL about the match up's, baby! ;)). I know that Friendswood will be bigger than us, I know they will have more depth than we will, and unless you don't follow football past the school you support, then you know about Maetzold (I think that's how you spell it). I also know we WILL have more speed than FW. Now you can argue, bitch, piss and moan all you want about that. But it's true whether you like it or not. If our DB's are faster than your WR's and can do a good enough job covering them man to man. Then that will enable us to bring more rushers than your line can block. If that happens then, yes, you could be in trouble. That's not me picking the team I support just because I support them. That's just football... ;)

[quote name="FriendswoodFan" post="835319" timestamp="1283215981"] Let me say there are clearly some 40 plus year old former WO-S players who were the real deal back in the 80s. [/quote] 2003 Kerry Franks (Texas A&M) 2004 Tommy Chavis (Missouri) 2005 Deon Beasley (Texas) 2006 Earl Thomas (Texas) 2006 Jacoby Franks (Texas Tech) 2009 Trey Franks (Oklahoma) 2009 James Haynes (Oklahoma) Present- Mark Roberts (Houston) Looks like we still have some players that are "the real deal". Again, lack of knowledge.   [quote author=FriendswoodFan link=topic=71184.msg835319#msg835319 date=1283215981] As folks from Dayton and Central have learned before you (and those teams are light years better than WO-S)[/quote] We are 9-3 against Central and 3-0 against Dayton... light years??? LOL

[quote name="fwstangs" post="834757" timestamp="1283140278"] [quote author=BIG HOUSE link=topic=71184.msg834620#msg834620 date=1283131448] FW-40 WO-S-18[size=18pt][/size] [/quote] Sir - you will earn the wrath of the Gassy one. You are on here making moronic predictions. How dare you. WOS is not getting any respect. We have won over 95 ball games in the last 10 years so we will win this game. I hear you make excuses! I hear you are new to this web site and should know WOS is fast and we never make excuses. Especially me the perfect Gassy!! [/quote] LOL... I could care less if people pick us to lose. I just love picking fights with, as my friend Judex put it, "pretentious blowhards" who think their poop don't stink. Who hang around websites where people don't know them trying to act intellectually and athletically astute when they really don't know squat. People who go to websites where people don't know them and try to rape the prestige of the programs they support like it gives them some sort of value, too, just because they use the name of that program as their user ID. Hey, I'm just yanking some "low hanging" chains, bro! ;D ;D ;D ;D :-* 

[quote name="fwstangs" post="834760" timestamp="1283140424"] [quote author=skipper link=topic=71184.msg834528#msg834528 date=1283122536] well we can say that we got beat by a team two times LARGER than us and with WORLD CLASS SPEED. if that dont work we can say we droped 5 passes in the end zone,are we can say we got flaged for holding all those 300 pound plus guys.are we can say we just got beat by a better team [/quote] You have not been paying attention to Gassy - WOS has the world class speed! FW is expecting a very good very tough game. Seems the chain yankers do not like having their chains yanked - which we have been doing a lot of!! [/quote] PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE go find a post where I made mention of our world class speed... Please! You are such a moron you don't even know who said what... LOL Why do you have your panties in such a wad? Did I wub you wittle feewings the wrong way? :P Oh and nice move going back and deleting your post where you predicted a FW victory by "21 points I think" is I believe how you worded it. That is soooooooooooooo lame, dude. Your argument and smack is so weak that your are resorting to covering your tracks. NICE!!!

[quote name="Card" post="834721" timestamp="1283137463"] [quote author=adminbaberuth link=topic=72162.msg834695#msg834695 date=1283135715] Both teams could score 50 this week. [/quote] No way Vidor scores 50 . The last couple of times we played them they got the W. This is BC's year for payback and Vidor will be lucky to score. Mark it down [i][u]Vidor will not score[/u][/i]. I just hope that coach doesnt let up after we get up by 3 TDs. We are expected to pulvarize them and we need to run up the score to keep our momentum for the next game. [/quote] LOL

[quote name="Card" post="834635" timestamp="1283132705"] BC     35 vidor  00 Seriously do they think that they are gonna beat us running the ball. Shepard couldnt run on us. Aint gonna happen  ;D [/quote] I don't have a dog in this fight, but Shepherd is about one step up from the sisters of the blind... They are not good. You can't compare their running game to that of Vidor.

From what I've been told, Angleton is very much a one man team. I think Dayton rolls in this one. Of course, I'm still scratching my head over the Elkins game. I thought Dayton would roll in that one too.

Some of you people are out of your minds!!!! Neumann is one of the best coaches in this area. Do you remember what the Ned program was like before he came? I do! It wasn't pretty. He has had some horrible luck lately with injuries etc. and still had Nederland in the playoffs. You guys need to calm down a bit and just let him do his thing. The bad events can't last forever and Ned has some good young talent right now. Things will get better.

[quote name="fwstangs" post="834508" timestamp="1283121033"] [quote author=Gasilla link=topic=71184.msg834410#msg834410 date=1283113314] [quote author=fwstangs link=topic=71184.msg834210#msg834210 date=1283092263] [quote author=Gasilla link=topic=71184.msg834040#msg834040 date=1283053831] [quote author=fwstangs link=topic=71184.msg833851#msg833851 date=1283045324] [quote author=liltex link=topic=71184.msg833812#msg833812 date=1283042462] Sayin Angleton has a quality fb team and using it as a leverage tool shows ya don't know fb good as ya think.Granted you've owned Dayton but most every game 4 of 7 by 3 pts.or less.Back to why you're so high on Angleton who is 45-42 in last 10 yrs-Since 1990=95-104-2.Got no horse in this contest and don't care other than I hope no kid gets hurt.FW stands on their own record and it's been really good as has WOS.Kids will decide who gets the braggin rights but I'm pickin FW by 3 scores. [/quote] You just talked in circles!! So since Angleton is 45-42 in the last 10 years they are not any good. I see. I  guess the fact that they made it to the 3rd round a lost a game they should have won to Brenham who made it to the championship means they are not as good as the teams that had better records over the past 10 years. dang - they should have just told the UIL they did not deserve to be in the playoffs! Now we all know that it appears that Angleton is over ranked at 6th in the state, but I think it is safe to say they are better than most 3a teams agreed? So we think maybe we got a feel for how we stack up against a good 3a team. Appreciate the fact that you think we will win by 3 td's, but did not follow your logic. [/quote] ...BUT  ;D you are talking about last year. He is talking about the last 10 years... what's the difference? It's all in the past. What Angleton did last year ain't gonna get them nothin this year... ;). And that #6 ranking would be better used by printing it out and using it for toilet paper. This year Angleton got pounded by a 3A team that isn't good. So you really think they give you a good idea about how you will fare against a GOOD 3A team? I am soooooo ready for Friday! [/quote] Thanks for playing into my trap, all the posts about how great the program is and we will win because of this and that, mean nothing. But since that is all we have to go with in the preseason, one would think the data from last year would be better than the last 10 year stuff!! Right Gassy - great name that fits the quality of posts. If you can not see the difference in that logic, well I guess we understand what level you work at!! Pounded in a scrimmage dude, we all have read the posts knowing that means nada also, right!! Eat your wheaties for Friday - you will need them. Make sure you show up now, dont back out! [/quote] Trap??? LOL... You know as well as I do you are just rambling. You get called on it and now it's a trap and you mean't to do it... RRRRRRRight!!! ;) Who said scrimmages don't mean anything? Not me, that's how I knew your "holy grail of football", Angleton, wasn't any good. And I'm glad you FW folk like my name. Original isn't it...  ;) One more thing, please quit trying so hard to look intelligent, the content of your posts are exposing your real intellect and I'm almost (almost) embarrassed for you.  ;D The Wheaties comment is just stupid (how old are you again? Thirty Four years past graduation, so that would make you what? 52? Again, I'm embarrassed) and anyone who knows me knows I'm going to show up Friday. ;) [/quote] :D :D :D :D :D Keep on trying Gassy man! Classic deflection technique. You have been exposed. Live in the current not the past! I wonder what excuses you will have Friday nite? Looking forward to the fiction! Refs against you perhaps? [/quote] I am living in the present... trying to get you to. Did you or did you not try to compare Angleton to us and other teams in this area based on what they have done in the past? Did you or did you not mention what you have done to Dayton and Central and Nederland in the past to try and justify why you believe you will win big against us? Or to try and use them to convince us that we have no idea what we are about to run into? Thought so! I used examples of what they have done this year, didn't I? Thought so! I have merely tried, in vain obviously, to counsel you in the err of your ways. Obviously, you are too dense to accept the lesson. I will have to leave you to your own demise. And again, you are rambling. I know you are new, but ask anyone around this site if have EVER made excuses for a WOS loss. It doesn’t happen! Why? 1. Because I don't make moronic predictions. I do have enough football sense to know that, when there are 2 talented and well coached teams that are involved, anything can happen. See, I've been there, done that. I can tell by talking to you that you, my friend, have not. 2. I give teams and their communities the respect they deserve when it's time to do so. One thing I cannot stand is for people to make excuses in defeat. YOU on the other hand, I've been told, are nothing but excuses. Hopefully, I will get to hear a few. ;D ;)

[quote name="raideroldtimer" post="834424" timestamp="1283114453"] Uh, shouldn't you guys start a new thread here? [/quote] Probably... that's getting old, isn't it?

[quote name="fwstangs" post="834210" timestamp="1283092263"] [quote author=Gasilla link=topic=71184.msg834040#msg834040 date=1283053831] [quote author=fwstangs link=topic=71184.msg833851#msg833851 date=1283045324] [quote author=liltex link=topic=71184.msg833812#msg833812 date=1283042462] Sayin Angleton has a quality fb team and using it as a leverage tool shows ya don't know fb good as ya think.Granted you've owned Dayton but most every game 4 of 7 by 3 pts.or less.Back to why you're so high on Angleton who is 45-42 in last 10 yrs-Since 1990=95-104-2.Got no horse in this contest and don't care other than I hope no kid gets hurt.FW stands on their own record and it's been really good as has WOS.Kids will decide who gets the braggin rights but I'm pickin FW by 3 scores. [/quote] You just talked in circles!! So since Angleton is 45-42 in the last 10 years they are not any good. I see. I  guess the fact that they made it to the 3rd round a lost a game they should have won to Brenham who made it to the championship means they are not as good as the teams that had better records over the past 10 years. dang - they should have just told the UIL they did not deserve to be in the playoffs! Now we all know that it appears that Angleton is over ranked at 6th in the state, but I think it is safe to say they are better than most 3a teams agreed? So we think maybe we got a feel for how we stack up against a good 3a team. Appreciate the fact that you think we will win by 3 td's, but did not follow your logic. [/quote] ...BUT  ;D you are talking about last year. He is talking about the last 10 years... what's the difference? It's all in the past. What Angleton did last year ain't gonna get them nothin this year... ;). And that #6 ranking would be better used by printing it out and using it for toilet paper. This year Angleton got pounded by a 3A team that isn't good. So you really think they give you a good idea about how you will fare against a GOOD 3A team? I am soooooo ready for Friday! [/quote] Thanks for playing into my trap, all the posts about how great the program is and we will win because of this and that, mean nothing. But since that is all we have to go with in the preseason, one would think the data from last year would be better than the last 10 year stuff!! Right Gassy - great name that fits the quality of posts. If you can not see the difference in that logic, well I guess we understand what level you work at!! Pounded in a scrimmage dude, we all have read the posts knowing that means nada also, right!! Eat your wheaties for Friday - you will need them. Make sure you show up now, dont back out! [/quote] Trap??? LOL... You know as well as I do you are just rambling. You get called on it and now it's a trap and you mean't to do it... RRRRRRRight!!! ;) Who said scrimmages don't mean anything? Not me, that's how I knew your "holy grail of football", Angleton, wasn't any good. And I'm glad you FW folk like my name. Original isn't it...  ;) One more thing, please quit trying so hard to look intelligent, the content of your posts are exposing your real intellect and I'm almost (almost) embarrassed for you.  ;D The Wheaties comment is just stupid (how old are you again? Thirty Four years past graduation, so that would make you what? 52? Again, I'm embarrassed) and anyone who knows me knows I'm going to show up Friday. ;)

[quote name="bigdog" post="834321" timestamp="1283104438"] [quote author=Gasilla link=topic=72002.msg833297#msg833297 date=1283019605] [quote author=mcdonajp link=topic=72002.msg833230#msg833230 date=1283015211] WO-S had several big plays for TD's and plays that got them out of long yardage (3rd & 20+ yds) for 1st downs.  Had Nederland stopped them on some of these maybe the score would have been a little closer but the end result still the same.  I thought Raine's did pretty good considering very little practice time and his first start against such a good/quick defense.  He will continue to improve through the season and only get better over the next couple years.  Next couple years will be exciting to watch. [/quote] I only remember one 3rd and 20+ yard conversion. [/quote] I think we helped you out of another one with a silly penalty. [/quote] That is the one I'm talking about. The long pass play from Garrett to Thomas was a 3rd and 6.

[quote name="mat" post="834181" timestamp="1283089264"] I'm not a Bulldog but; Didn't WOS beat Nederland soundly last year? Didn't Nederland lose their #1 QB last year in week one? Didn't Nederland make the playoffs last year? Be patient [/quote] Yes Yes Yes I agree, Neumann said in the paper that they aren't about to go out and slash their wrists over this, I think the Ned fans should follow suit.

[quote name="fwstangs" post="833851" timestamp="1283045324"] [quote author=liltex link=topic=71184.msg833812#msg833812 date=1283042462] Sayin Angleton has a quality fb team and using it as a leverage tool shows ya don't know fb good as ya think.Granted you've owned Dayton but most every game 4 of 7 by 3 pts.or less.Back to why you're so high on Angleton who is 45-42 in last 10 yrs-Since 1990=95-104-2.Got no horse in this contest and don't care other than I hope no kid gets hurt.FW stands on their own record and it's been really good as has WOS.Kids will decide who gets the braggin rights but I'm pickin FW by 3 scores. [/quote] You just talked in circles!! So since Angleton is 45-42 in the last 10 years they are not any good. I see. I  guess the fact that they made it to the 3rd round a lost a game they should have won to Brenham who made it to the championship means they are not as good as the teams that had better records over the past 10 years. dang - they should have just told the UIL they did not deserve to be in the playoffs! Now we all know that it appears that Angleton is over ranked at 6th in the state, but I think it is safe to say they are better than most 3a teams agreed? So we think maybe we got a feel for how we stack up against a good 3a team. Appreciate the fact that you think we will win by 3 td's, but did not follow your logic. [/quote] ...BUT  ;D you are talking about last year. He is talking about the last 10 years... what's the difference? It's all in the past. What Angleton did last year ain't gonna get them nothin this year... ;). And that #6 ranking would be better used by printing it out and using it for toilet paper. This year Angleton got pounded by a 3A team that isn't good. So you really think they give you a good idea about how you will fare against a GOOD 3A team? I am soooooo ready for Friday!

[quote name="AggiesAreWe" post="833629" timestamp="1283034901"] [quote author=Gasilla link=topic=72002.msg833617#msg833617 date=1283034469] [quote author=Ned11str8 link=topic=72002.msg833612#msg833612 date=1283034282] [quote author=Penny link=topic=72002.msg833334#msg833334 date=1283022381] I can still remember Bellow in his first varsity action when Sampere went down... there is no substitute for experience at the QB position.  By the time Bellow got to see varsity game speed a coupla times, he was money, even as a sophomore.  That's going to happen for Raines, but it's not going to happen first game out the blocks, and it sure isn't going to happen against WO-S.  Give the kid a little time and we got another gem. [color=red]I will eat my shoe if Nederland is battling Vidor for the cellar... folks thought the same thing last year.  [/color] [/quote] Ned will not be in the cellar with Vidor [/quote] scooter wasn't saying Ned would be in the cellar, he said they would be fighting with Vidor for the last playoff spot. [/quote] I agree Gas. I think scooter was talking about that last playoff spot. But, I can see where folks thought he could be talking about the cellar. [/quote] Me too.

[quote name="Ned11str8" post="833612" timestamp="1283034282"] [quote author=Penny link=topic=72002.msg833334#msg833334 date=1283022381] I can still remember Bellow in his first varsity action when Sampere went down... there is no substitute for experience at the QB position.  By the time Bellow got to see varsity game speed a coupla times, he was money, even as a sophomore.  That's going to happen for Raines, but it's not going to happen first game out the blocks, and it sure isn't going to happen against WO-S.  Give the kid a little time and we got another gem. [color=red]I will eat my shoe if Nederland is battling Vidor for the cellar... folks thought the same thing last year.  [/color] [/quote] Ned will not be in the cellar with Vidor [/quote] scooter wasn't saying Ned would be in the cellar, he said they would be fighting with Vidor for the last playoff spot.