Jump to content

Gasilla

Members
  • Posts

    3,161
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Gasilla

  1. I dont believe that for a second! I had no report at all that he was injured Friday.
  2. [quote name="bigdog" post="829046" timestamp="1282506132"] [quote author=Gtj007 link=topic=71388.msg829006#msg829006 date=1282502654] Nederland was driving in wos territory late in the game.  I believe it was inside the 30 down by 4.  Nederland may not have scored but had t he opportunity taken away by an awful call. [/quote] Really?  Are we bringing this up again?  How many years ago was this, 5? [/quote] 10 actually, can you believe that? Seems like yesterday!
  3. [quote name="baddog" post="829043" timestamp="1282506062"] [quote author=Gasilla link=topic=71388.msg828950#msg828950 date=1282497676] [quote author=baddog link=topic=71388.msg828940#msg828940 date=1282496927] [quote author=w link=topic=71388.msg828914#msg828914 date=1282493450] [quote author=baddog link=topic=71388.msg828594#msg828594 date=1282419123] [quote author=bobbymcgee link=topic=71388.msg828548#msg828548 date=1282408713] WO-S by a lateral  :) [/quote] It was an incomplete pass.  ;D [/quote] LOL...still can't get over it, huh?  It's been 10 years, can you believe it? ;D [/quote] Oh, I'm over it. Still just don't like to see it miscalled. That win would have made it four years in a row.  ;) [/quote] Oh baddog... selective memory. Even if the bad call wasn't made you still lose the game... [/quote] On the 10 or 12 and driving.....I loved our chances. Yes we lost, Gas, how is that selective? I had bad seats and it happened to be in range of my yard line. Had it been a lateral, I'd be the first to say they made the right call. Besides, I'm not the one who brought this up. Hopefully we can get you in some punting situations.  :D [/quote] By selective, I mean you say it like if it wouldn't have been a TD for us it would have been one for you... LOL. You still had a lot of work left to do had that call never been made. ;D
  4. [quote name="Gtj007" post="829006" timestamp="1282502654"] Nederland was driving in wos territory late in the game.  I believe it was inside the 30 down by 4.  Nederland may not have scored but had t he opportunity taken away by an awful call. [/quote] Yes, it was actually at the 22 and it would have brought up a 3rd and 10 against the best defense in 4A that year. Not saying Ned wouldn't have scored, but if I were a betting man... ;) ...and there is no doubt it was a horrible call. I personally don't think it canged the outcome, but I guess we will never really know.
  5. [quote name="rykerx144" post="828844" timestamp="1282476416"]Im not even sure you should be playing Kirbyville but thats a completly different converstaion.  [/quote] Really??? Please explain that statement.
  6. [quote name="baddog" post="828940" timestamp="1282496927"] [quote author=w link=topic=71388.msg828914#msg828914 date=1282493450] [quote author=baddog link=topic=71388.msg828594#msg828594 date=1282419123] [quote author=bobbymcgee link=topic=71388.msg828548#msg828548 date=1282408713] WO-S by a lateral  :) [/quote] It was an incomplete pass.  ;D [/quote] LOL...still can't get over it, huh?  It's been 10 years, can you believe it? ;D [/quote] Oh, I'm over it. Still just don't like to see it miscalled. That win would have made it four years in a row.  ;) [/quote] Oh baddog... selective memory. Even if the bad call wasn't made you still lose the game...
  7. [quote name="skipper" post="828902" timestamp="1282492030"] skipper IS GOING TO EAT MY WORDS.i put my foot in my mouth a couple weeks ago by saying wo-s has no running game and the OL needed work bad.i did not make the dayton scrimmage but was told the kids relly did not look all that bad .21 points put up by dayton were put up on big plays,you that were there can tell me diffrent if this is not true.dayton has a great program there and are one of the best teams around these parts and great coaching.ok back to wo-s running game lol,was sitting with a long time vidor fan and long time friend and belive me he knows all the ends and out of high school football.vidor is not as big as thay have been in the past but dont back down from no one he said about this years vidor team and he likes that.we were watching very close the little running back there from west orange stark and glenn nicknamed him  walter payton jr becouse of his moves and very  hard to bring down and glenn said if wo-s can give the QB time to put the ball  up to his skilled WRs its going to be a long night for alot of teams.if some of the true blue nederland fans can remember last years game the wo-s QB is not all that bad of a runner himself    PS sorry for the spelling [/quote] Dayton dominated the LOS against us... we looked bad. Garrett had no time to throw and we could not run the ball. The defense played well until late in the first half when they ran out of juice because our offense went 3 and out so much. Then when we did get down inside the 10 a couple times they fumbled. Anyway, you can't expect the defense to be in shape after a week and the offensive line, although large, is where our inexperience lies on offense. Only one of them started every game last year and the center spot started when jordan was injured. The rest were on JV so no surprise that they got beat up on by Daytons big experienced front. Probably good to see such a talented bunch out of the gate, beause they may not see a better front again this year. They looked much better against Vidor and I think we will see improvement every week from them.
  8. [quote name="venom33" post="828718" timestamp="1282442090"] [quote author=GoDogs27 link=topic=71388.msg828631#msg828631 date=1282430491] [quote author=rykerx144 link=topic=71388.msg828546#msg828546 date=1282408578] I have heard Hooks accused of alot of things before but hiding a kicker would be a first! [/quote] maybe he had a concussion and hooks is hiding him in the shed lol   :D [/quote] kicking help is on the way!   ;) [/quote] THANK  YOU  VENOM!!!! I surely hope you are serious... To say our kicking game is grotesque would be an understatement.
  9. Well, any new predictions after we have both scrimmaged Dayton? Both lost by the same point spread. Dayton starters played longer against Ned, but Dayton didn't play as well with the fumbles and dropped passes. They also had some receivers not play. WOS looked very bad against Dayton. Dropped passes, fumbles in redzone... Come on guys, this WOS vs Nederland! Where is all the smack?
  10. [quote name="rykerx144" post="828236" timestamp="1282355172"] im not complaining or crying!  I just said Hooks deserves them six!!   :) [/quote] I was referencing the East Chambers guys comments.
  11. [quote name="Kville_Kats" post="827756" timestamp="1282298906"]don't know whether to wind their butt,or scratch their watch [/quote] LOL, I've always loved that saying!  ;D
  12. [quote name="Judex" post="828130" timestamp="1282350235"] [quote author=ECBucFan link=topic=71834.msg828086#msg828086 date=1282344646] WOS will survive in the playoffs until Hooks runs into an officiating crew he can't intimidate. [/quote] regardless of whether Hooks had his way over a call in a scrimmage or not, this is a stupid comment. i guess we should just forfeit all of our games since Hooks became head coach. they were only victories because Hooks intimidated the refs right? [/quote] What's up Cuz?
  13. [quote name="ECBucFan" post="828086" timestamp="1282344646"] [quote author=rykerx144 link=topic=71834.msg827822#msg827822 date=1282314226] [quote author=Roughrider link=topic=71834.msg827794#msg827794 date=1282312625] If I was a WOS fan, I would be a little concerned about how Vidor moved the ball around the corners with the Chain Gang pretty much stacking 11 men in the box. There was never a threat for Vidor to pass so everyone knew it was a run every play. In all fairness, I left at half time so did not see much in the second half. [color=red][size=12pt]But Vidor fumbled in their own red zone and it was returned for a TD. Probably should have been WOS 6--Vidor 0 at half time. [/size] [/color] On the other hand, WOS QB is very dangerous along with the big WR. I just feel that the stangs were to one dimensional to move the ball. A really good defense will put a spy man on the QB and put a halt to all those long scrambles. With that being said, he is one heck of an athlete with a good double threat, scramble/run and he has a good arm. That endzone pass in the corner to big boy is gonna be pretty tough to stop. I really think this WOS/NED game is gonna be a really good hard fought game. I cant wait. [/quote] thats the play i was talking about giving Hooks credit for the 6 points.  WOS picked up a fumble and ran it the length of the field.  The Line Judge on WOS side threw a flag for a OBVIOUS block in the back.  Immediately after the play was over Hooks had conversation with the LJ that threw the flag and the Umpire came over for a second and they talked with Hooks and then it was waved off and counted the TD.  About that time is when Matthews justifiably blew his top!! LOL   Hooks needs credit for them 6 points LOL ;D [/quote] WOS will survive in the playoffs until Hooks runs into an officiating crew he can't intimidate. [/quote] You know, I have heard plenty of crying about that with Dan over the years, and I have either seen or played in nearly every game WOS has played and most of that is BS and sour grapes most of the time. However, last night I think he may actually have intimidated those ref's into making that call. It was obvious, blatant and right in the middle of the field where everyone in attendence saw it, but they went and assessed the penalty on the kick off instead of calling the TD back. WOS more than likely would have scored later anyway because they just couldn't stop them, but I'm still scratching my head over how they called it. ::)
  14. [quote name="fwstangs" post="828059" timestamp="1282339842"]If that is arrogance then you have never played sports. [/quote] THAT is funny there...  ;D It breaks my heart that you do not think highly of me... :'( :'( :'(
  15. [quote name="skipper" post="828076" timestamp="1282342903"] dont look like coach dan is all that upset about the mustangs kicking game at this point in time,dont look for wo-s to win by a FG are extra point this year  :(. i was told KICKER was working with a kid  what happned to that [/quote] Skip, YOU are the ONLY person that I have heard this from. You sure you didn't dream that. LOL
  16. Dayton is stout, offensively as well as defensively.
  17. [quote name="fwstangs" post="827933" timestamp="1282324025"] [quote author=Gasilla link=topic=71652.msg827910#msg827910 date=1282321678] [quote author=fwstangs link=topic=71652.msg827800#msg827800 date=1282313052] [quote author=Gasilla link=topic=71652.msg827709#msg827709 date=1282275384] [quote author=fwstangs link=topic=71652.msg827512#msg827512 date=1282259556] [quote author=Tyrone_Biggums link=topic=71652.msg826196#msg826196 date=1282009942] Is Friendshood chiming in?  I heard that Dayton tried to schedule and that the mustangs backed out because they didn't want to get beat down this year.   [/quote] Right - after 6 straight wins we backed out!! We were supposed to get beat down the last 3 years. But Dayton does not play well early in the year, so we decided to play Angleton. No fella - the schedules changed because of redistricting. If we were running from a fight, you think we would have scheduled Angleton?? They are better than Dayton this year I think. [/quote] Soooooooooo... FW has a sure win against WOS based on how we played in a first scrimmage against Dayton... but Angleton is better than Dayton after getting their teeth kicked in last week by a 3A West Columbia that went 3-7 or 2-8 last year... Hmmmmmm ??? ::) :-\ [/quote] You clearly are not paying attention to my posts. Did I say anything about a sure win?? Did I draw any conclusions from your terrible showing vs Dayton? Do I think Angleton is not any good because they had a subpar showing in their first scrimmage. NO. What I did say is that Angleton is better than Dayton, and we are not running from Dayton. Can you get that? Yes I do think we will beat WOS, team that is supposed to have good speed, very little size and depth. We are a very athletic, strong, fast and disciplined team with good size and depth. Can you stay with me there Gasilla, I know I threw a lot at ya! PS - I had not ready anything about the Angleton vs West Columbia scrimmage, so I went looking. There is a big difference between these two descriptions -1.  Angleton did not play well during the controlled scrimmage where WC kept them from scoring much if any. WC did not score any. In the timed scrimmage - Angleton dominated. 2. Angelton got their teeth kicked in. What I interpreted from the sports reporters that were there, Angelton was very flat, WC was pumped and it was a draw. Once Angleton got fired up, they took it to them as expected. Do your homework Gasilla! PS by all accounts I have read Dayton dominated WOS and WOS dominated poor Vidor. So - using your logic WOS will win the state title!! [/quote] "Columbia held state-ranked Angleton to one TD and FG, while scoring 5 times against the Wildcats. Columbia scored on the first and last play from scrimmage and totaled 4 scores during the scripted portion of the scrimmage. In the 2-15 minute game clock portions of the scrimmage Angleton scored once and also kicked a field goal, while Columbia only managed a single TD." This is from another website and is the bare bones about that scrimmage. Yes that looks pretty much like they were handled pretty good by a 3A team that wasn't very good last year. As for all the other excuses you are posting about that scrimmage, I'm not gonna address because it is obviously full of homerism from some homer writer, [b]if [/b] what you said is even true. [b]I posted no excuses - just the facts - got that Gasilla. Show me where I tried to excuse Angletons performance. I know that is hard for you - but try to find some excuses. PS this was posted by another web site reporter, not a local paper![/b] [b][i]"Angelton was very flat", "WC was pumped ", "Once Angleton got fired up", Excuses!!! And it wreaks of, "they only played better because ... (see previous excuses) which is nothing more than Homer mentality. Got that?[/i][/b] [quote author=fwstangs link=topic=71652.msg827800#msg827800 date=1282313052]Did I say anything about a sure win?? [/quote] You have predicted your team to win and you argue about us having more speed, but at the same time assume you are correct about FW being bigger, more discipline, athletic and having more depth... You have not come right out and posted a sure win, but you defnitely insinuate it by your demeanor. Are you able to grasp that? I know that's throwing a lot at you? OK I will spell it out for you because you are one of those who can't recognize your own arrogance... You did not say directly that you are bigger, stronger, as fast and more discipline, but if you mention those things, and feel pretty confident that you are going to win (which you have posted previously) then you must feel that you do have us beat in those areas, right? Hello? [b]Again  - you seem to have grammar issues - show me where I said we were bigger, as fast, stronger and more disciplined? So just mentioning the characteristics of our team makes me arrogant. Of course I feel we are going to win fella, it is my team. PS - most of the setxsports fans who all just love FW also think we are going to win. But so what - we still have to play the game. PS - the purpose of these boards is to discuss - but when you cop a tude - I will get right back in your face. I assume you are an WOS fan? Have a kid playing - great - enjoy the experience and work on your post reading skills and some thicker skin.[/b] [b][i]Funny, you mention grammar issues but then proceed to point out nothing about grammar. Maybe the word you are looking for is "comprehension" and yes I do very well at that. Maybe you should try a little because I said on my last post that you insinuate with the things you say and the context in which you put them. It is implied... LOL Your trying awfully hard to make yourself sound intelligent, but then unwittingly discredit yourself... LOL. Tude??? Dude, you started with a tude... ;)[/i][/b] [quote author=fwstangs link=topic=71652.msg827800#msg827800 date=1282313052]What I did say is that Angleton is better than Dayton, and we are not running from Dayton. Can you get that?[/quote] No, I don't get that, I understand not running from Dayton, but I don't get you repeatedly mentioning how good Angleton is and even saying they are better than Dayton, when you have nothing to base that on other than to try and prove your argument. Dayton went to the Semi's in 07, Final's in 08 and the Regional finals in 09. What has Angleton done other than perform poorly against a subpar 3A so far? [b]Because we know Dayton and Angleton very well, I think Angleton is better this year - ok!!! You bring up history which has nothing to do with this year. I know the returning talend from each team, we played them both, and think Angleton has more back. Both are very good teams. Got it, simple opinion and no ones is better - not even yours, now that is arrogance!![/b] [b][i]LOL... I did not say either one was better than the other, nor did I imply it. You were the one who stepped out there and made the statement that one was better than the other. I used a little common sense and football knowledge to discredit it. ;D[/i][/b] Anyway, I've said enough, I've dealt with your type to many times. You will not see it. It's those dang rose colored glasses... ;D [b]But I have said enough , I have dealt with your type so many times - you have orange colored glasses!![/b] TOUCHE! [/quote] [/quote]
  18. [quote name="fwstangs" post="827941" timestamp="1282324939"] [quote author=Gasilla link=topic=71184.msg827855#msg827855 date=1282317186] [quote author=rjn75 link=topic=71184.msg827853#msg827853 date=1282316880] FW will put up 40+, they will pretty much shut down Wos throughout but will give up a couple scores late with reserves and less intensity.  FW will have too many weapons tha WOS will not have answers for. [/quote] If that happens I will congratulate you guys... If you are wrong DO NOT come back and try to erase this post. If you do I will embarrass you to no end... And I will take sooooo much pleasure in rubbing it in your face!! ;) ;D [/quote] But if we rub it in your face we arrogant FW fans correct? Got it. [/quote] No because I have not given you anything to rub in my face... ;) I have not made any predictions much less give a lofty prediction in our favor. I've been around football for a long time and I know better than making predictions about a team that I know nothing about other than what I hear on message boards... You know, I used "arrogant", but there are actually a couple of words used to describe someone who is so sure of themselves in the face of an unfamiliar opponent that is usually a quality team. They are either arrogant or stupid, you can make your own pick there if you feel arrogant is not fitting... ;D
  19. [quote name="Roughrider" post="827794" timestamp="1282312625"] If I was a WOS fan, I would be a little concerned about how Vidor moved the ball around the corners with the Chain Gang pretty much stacking 11 men in the box. There was never a threat for Vidor to pass so everyone knew it was a run every play. In all fairness, I left at half time so did not see much in the second half. But Vidor fumbled in their own red zone and it was returned for a TD. Probably should have been WOS 6--Vidor 0 at half time. On the other hand, WOS QB is very dangerous along with the big WR. I just feel that the stangs were to one dimensional to move the ball. A really good defense will put a spy man on the QB and put a halt to all those long scrambles. With that being said, he is one heck of an athlete with a good double threat, scramble/run and he has a good arm. That endzone pass in the corner to big boy is gonna be pretty tough to stop. I really think this WOS/NED game is gonna be a really good hard fought game. I cant wait. [/quote] One dimensional... WOS had over 200 yards rushing and 170 passing??? I wonder what game you watched... LOL I have to agree with the block in the back though. Dont know what that was all about... :D
  20. [quote name="fwstangs" post="827800" timestamp="1282313052"] [quote author=Gasilla link=topic=71652.msg827709#msg827709 date=1282275384] [quote author=fwstangs link=topic=71652.msg827512#msg827512 date=1282259556] [quote author=Tyrone_Biggums link=topic=71652.msg826196#msg826196 date=1282009942] Is Friendshood chiming in?  I heard that Dayton tried to schedule and that the mustangs backed out because they didn't want to get beat down this year.   [/quote] Right - after 6 straight wins we backed out!! We were supposed to get beat down the last 3 years. But Dayton does not play well early in the year, so we decided to play Angleton. No fella - the schedules changed because of redistricting. If we were running from a fight, you think we would have scheduled Angleton?? They are better than Dayton this year I think. [/quote] Soooooooooo... FW has a sure win against WOS based on how we played in a first scrimmage against Dayton... but Angleton is better than Dayton after getting their teeth kicked in last week by a 3A West Columbia that went 3-7 or 2-8 last year... Hmmmmmm ??? ::) :-\ [/quote] You clearly are not paying attention to my posts. Did I say anything about a sure win?? Did I draw any conclusions from your terrible showing vs Dayton? Do I think Angleton is not any good because they had a subpar showing in their first scrimmage. NO. What I did say is that Angleton is better than Dayton, and we are not running from Dayton. Can you get that? Yes I do think we will beat WOS, team that is supposed to have good speed, very little size and depth. We are a very athletic, strong, fast and disciplined team with good size and depth. Can you stay with me there Gasilla, I know I threw a lot at ya! PS - I had not ready anything about the Angleton vs West Columbia scrimmage, so I went looking. There is a big difference between these two descriptions -1.  Angleton did not play well during the controlled scrimmage where WC kept them from scoring much if any. WC did not score any. In the timed scrimmage - Angleton dominated. 2. Angelton got their teeth kicked in. What I interpreted from the sports reporters that were there, Angelton was very flat, WC was pumped and it was a draw. Once Angleton got fired up, they took it to them as expected. Do your homework Gasilla! PS by all accounts I have read Dayton dominated WOS and WOS dominated poor Vidor. So - using your logic WOS will win the state title!! [/quote] "Columbia held state-ranked Angleton to one TD and FG, while scoring 5 times against the Wildcats. Columbia scored on the first and last play from scrimmage and totaled 4 scores during the scripted portion of the scrimmage. In the 2-15 minute game clock portions of the scrimmage Angleton scored once and also kicked a field goal, while Columbia only managed a single TD." This is from another website and is the bare bones about that scrimmage. Yes that looks pretty much like they were handled pretty good by a 3A team that wasn't very good last year. As for all the other excuses you are posting about that scrimmage, I'm not gonna address because it is obviously full of homerism from some homer writer, [b]if [/b] what you said is even true. [quote author=fwstangs link=topic=71652.msg827800#msg827800 date=1282313052]Did I say anything about a sure win?? [/quote] You have predicted your team to win and you argue about us having more speed, but at the same time assume you are correct about FW being bigger, more discipline, athletic and having more depth... You have not come right out and posted a sure win, but you defnitely insinuate it by your demeanor. Are you able to grasp that? I know that's throwing a lot at you? OK I will spell it out for you because you are one of those who can't recognize your own arrogance... You did not say directly that you are bigger, stronger, as fast and more discipline, but if you mention those things, and feel pretty confident that you are going to win (which you have posted previously) then you must feel that you do have us beat in those areas, right? Hello? [quote author=fwstangs link=topic=71652.msg827800#msg827800 date=1282313052]What I did say is that Angleton is better than Dayton, and we are not running from Dayton. Can you get that?[/quote] No, I don't get that, I understand not running from Dayton, but I don't get you repeatedly mentioning how good Angleton is and even saying they are better than Dayton, when you have nothing to base that on other than to try and prove your argument. Dayton went to the Semi's in 07, Final's in 08 and the Regional finals in 09. What has Angleton done other than perform poorly against a subpar 3A so far? Anyway, I've said enough, I've dealt with your type to many times. You will not see it. It's those dang rose colored glasses... ;D
  21. [quote name="rjn75" post="827857" timestamp="1282317263"] Todays FW teams are completey different!  You cant use 2000 when trying to make a point. [/quote] That is why I prefaced that with the statements, "I have not seen our speed compared to FW" and also put into parenthesis that I realize the last time we played was a long time ago. ;)
  22. [quote name="rjn75" post="827853" timestamp="1282316880"] FW will put up 40+, they will pretty much shut down Wos throughout but will give up a couple scores late with reserves and less intensity.  FW will have too many weapons tha WOS will not have answers for. [/quote] If that happens I will congratulate you guys... If you are wrong DO NOT come back and try to erase this post. If you do I will embarrass you to no end... And I will take sooooo much pleasure in rubbing it in your face!! ;) ;D
  23. FW fans think they are going to win because they are big and have executed well in the past, Panama is merely saying that WOS has a shot because we will be faster. What's the big deal??? Both sides have a reason why they think a team will be successful. I would imagine that WOS [b]IS[/b] probably faster than FW and FW [b]IS[/b] probably bigger than WOS. I don't know why ya'll are getting so excited about it. I never read where he said being faster guaranteed a win, but neither does being bigger and beating Dayton 47 years in a row... ;) I have not seen our speed compared to FW. I do know that when we played them in 2000 (which was a long time ago, I know) we were WAY faster than FW and their players even said so after the game. The game is going to come down, as always, to match ups. Period.
  24. [quote name="rykerx144" post="827710" timestamp="1282275989"] besides the fewer dropped passes are we sure WOS improved that much or just played a weaker team?? [/quote] Vidor is definitely no Dayton no doubt, but WOS moved the ball at will on Vidor. They scored 43 points and had 2 turnovers inside the 10 yd line. They dominated the scrimmage and that's about all you can really ask for, isn't it? No one has claimed state title potential, but yes, there was definite improvement, like it or not.
  25. [quote name="fwstangs" post="827512" timestamp="1282259556"] [quote author=Tyrone_Biggums link=topic=71652.msg826196#msg826196 date=1282009942] Is Friendshood chiming in?  I heard that Dayton tried to schedule and that the mustangs backed out because they didn't want to get beat down this year.  [/quote] Right - after 6 straight wins we backed out!! We were supposed to get beat down the last 3 years. But Dayton does not play well early in the year, so we decided to play Angleton. No fella - the schedules changed because of redistricting. If we were running from a fight, you think we would have scheduled Angleton?? They are better than Dayton this year I think. [/quote] Soooooooooo... FW has a sure win against WOS based on how we played in a first scrimmage against Dayton... but Angleton is better than Dayton after getting their teeth kicked in last week by a 3A West Columbia that went 3-7 or 2-8 last year... Hmmmmmm ??? ::) :-\
×
×
  • Create New...