Gasilla

[quote name="fwstangs" post="828059" timestamp="1282339842"]If that is arrogance then you have never played sports. [/quote] THAT is funny there...  ;D It breaks my heart that you do not think highly of me... :'( :'( :'(

[quote name="skipper" post="828076" timestamp="1282342903"] dont look like coach dan is all that upset about the mustangs kicking game at this point in time,dont look for wo-s to win by a FG are extra point this year  :(. i was told KICKER was working with a kid  what happned to that [/quote] Skip, YOU are the ONLY person that I have heard this from. You sure you didn't dream that. LOL

Dayton is stout, offensively as well as defensively.

[quote name="fwstangs" post="827933" timestamp="1282324025"] [quote author=Gasilla link=topic=71652.msg827910#msg827910 date=1282321678] [quote author=fwstangs link=topic=71652.msg827800#msg827800 date=1282313052] [quote author=Gasilla link=topic=71652.msg827709#msg827709 date=1282275384] [quote author=fwstangs link=topic=71652.msg827512#msg827512 date=1282259556] [quote author=Tyrone_Biggums link=topic=71652.msg826196#msg826196 date=1282009942] Is Friendshood chiming in?  I heard that Dayton tried to schedule and that the mustangs backed out because they didn't want to get beat down this year.   [/quote] Right - after 6 straight wins we backed out!! We were supposed to get beat down the last 3 years. But Dayton does not play well early in the year, so we decided to play Angleton. No fella - the schedules changed because of redistricting. If we were running from a fight, you think we would have scheduled Angleton?? They are better than Dayton this year I think. [/quote] Soooooooooo... FW has a sure win against WOS based on how we played in a first scrimmage against Dayton... but Angleton is better than Dayton after getting their teeth kicked in last week by a 3A West Columbia that went 3-7 or 2-8 last year... Hmmmmmm ??? ::) :-\ [/quote] You clearly are not paying attention to my posts. Did I say anything about a sure win?? Did I draw any conclusions from your terrible showing vs Dayton? Do I think Angleton is not any good because they had a subpar showing in their first scrimmage. NO. What I did say is that Angleton is better than Dayton, and we are not running from Dayton. Can you get that? Yes I do think we will beat WOS, team that is supposed to have good speed, very little size and depth. We are a very athletic, strong, fast and disciplined team with good size and depth. Can you stay with me there Gasilla, I know I threw a lot at ya! PS - I had not ready anything about the Angleton vs West Columbia scrimmage, so I went looking. There is a big difference between these two descriptions -1.  Angleton did not play well during the controlled scrimmage where WC kept them from scoring much if any. WC did not score any. In the timed scrimmage - Angleton dominated. 2. Angelton got their teeth kicked in. What I interpreted from the sports reporters that were there, Angelton was very flat, WC was pumped and it was a draw. Once Angleton got fired up, they took it to them as expected. Do your homework Gasilla! PS by all accounts I have read Dayton dominated WOS and WOS dominated poor Vidor. So - using your logic WOS will win the state title!! [/quote] "Columbia held state-ranked Angleton to one TD and FG, while scoring 5 times against the Wildcats. Columbia scored on the first and last play from scrimmage and totaled 4 scores during the scripted portion of the scrimmage. In the 2-15 minute game clock portions of the scrimmage Angleton scored once and also kicked a field goal, while Columbia only managed a single TD." This is from another website and is the bare bones about that scrimmage. Yes that looks pretty much like they were handled pretty good by a 3A team that wasn't very good last year. As for all the other excuses you are posting about that scrimmage, I'm not gonna address because it is obviously full of homerism from some homer writer, [b]if [/b] what you said is even true. [b]I posted no excuses - just the facts - got that Gasilla. Show me where I tried to excuse Angletons performance. I know that is hard for you - but try to find some excuses. PS this was posted by another web site reporter, not a local paper![/b] [b][i]"Angelton was very flat", "WC was pumped ", "Once Angleton got fired up", Excuses!!! And it wreaks of, "they only played better because ... (see previous excuses) which is nothing more than Homer mentality. Got that?[/i][/b] [quote author=fwstangs link=topic=71652.msg827800#msg827800 date=1282313052]Did I say anything about a sure win?? [/quote] You have predicted your team to win and you argue about us having more speed, but at the same time assume you are correct about FW being bigger, more discipline, athletic and having more depth... You have not come right out and posted a sure win, but you defnitely insinuate it by your demeanor. Are you able to grasp that? I know that's throwing a lot at you? OK I will spell it out for you because you are one of those who can't recognize your own arrogance... You did not say directly that you are bigger, stronger, as fast and more discipline, but if you mention those things, and feel pretty confident that you are going to win (which you have posted previously) then you must feel that you do have us beat in those areas, right? Hello? [b]Again  - you seem to have grammar issues - show me where I said we were bigger, as fast, stronger and more disciplined? So just mentioning the characteristics of our team makes me arrogant. Of course I feel we are going to win fella, it is my team. PS - most of the setxsports fans who all just love FW also think we are going to win. But so what - we still have to play the game. PS - the purpose of these boards is to discuss - but when you cop a tude - I will get right back in your face. I assume you are an WOS fan? Have a kid playing - great - enjoy the experience and work on your post reading skills and some thicker skin.[/b] [b][i]Funny, you mention grammar issues but then proceed to point out nothing about grammar. Maybe the word you are looking for is "comprehension" and yes I do very well at that. Maybe you should try a little because I said on my last post that you insinuate with the things you say and the context in which you put them. It is implied... LOL Your trying awfully hard to make yourself sound intelligent, but then unwittingly discredit yourself... LOL. Tude??? Dude, you started with a tude... ;)[/i][/b] [quote author=fwstangs link=topic=71652.msg827800#msg827800 date=1282313052]What I did say is that Angleton is better than Dayton, and we are not running from Dayton. Can you get that?[/quote] No, I don't get that, I understand not running from Dayton, but I don't get you repeatedly mentioning how good Angleton is and even saying they are better than Dayton, when you have nothing to base that on other than to try and prove your argument. Dayton went to the Semi's in 07, Final's in 08 and the Regional finals in 09. What has Angleton done other than perform poorly against a subpar 3A so far? [b]Because we know Dayton and Angleton very well, I think Angleton is better this year - ok!!! You bring up history which has nothing to do with this year. I know the returning talend from each team, we played them both, and think Angleton has more back. Both are very good teams. Got it, simple opinion and no ones is better - not even yours, now that is arrogance!![/b] [b][i]LOL... I did not say either one was better than the other, nor did I imply it. You were the one who stepped out there and made the statement that one was better than the other. I used a little common sense and football knowledge to discredit it. ;D[/i][/b] Anyway, I've said enough, I've dealt with your type to many times. You will not see it. It's those dang rose colored glasses... ;D [b]But I have said enough , I have dealt with your type so many times - you have orange colored glasses!![/b] TOUCHE! [/quote] [/quote]

[quote name="fwstangs" post="827941" timestamp="1282324939"] [quote author=Gasilla link=topic=71184.msg827855#msg827855 date=1282317186] [quote author=rjn75 link=topic=71184.msg827853#msg827853 date=1282316880] FW will put up 40+, they will pretty much shut down Wos throughout but will give up a couple scores late with reserves and less intensity.  FW will have too many weapons tha WOS will not have answers for. [/quote] If that happens I will congratulate you guys... If you are wrong DO NOT come back and try to erase this post. If you do I will embarrass you to no end... And I will take sooooo much pleasure in rubbing it in your face!! ;) ;D [/quote] But if we rub it in your face we arrogant FW fans correct? Got it. [/quote] No because I have not given you anything to rub in my face... ;) I have not made any predictions much less give a lofty prediction in our favor. I've been around football for a long time and I know better than making predictions about a team that I know nothing about other than what I hear on message boards... You know, I used "arrogant", but there are actually a couple of words used to describe someone who is so sure of themselves in the face of an unfamiliar opponent that is usually a quality team. They are either arrogant or stupid, you can make your own pick there if you feel arrogant is not fitting... ;D

[quote name="Roughrider" post="827794" timestamp="1282312625"] If I was a WOS fan, I would be a little concerned about how Vidor moved the ball around the corners with the Chain Gang pretty much stacking 11 men in the box. There was never a threat for Vidor to pass so everyone knew it was a run every play. In all fairness, I left at half time so did not see much in the second half. But Vidor fumbled in their own red zone and it was returned for a TD. Probably should have been WOS 6--Vidor 0 at half time. On the other hand, WOS QB is very dangerous along with the big WR. I just feel that the stangs were to one dimensional to move the ball. A really good defense will put a spy man on the QB and put a halt to all those long scrambles. With that being said, he is one heck of an athlete with a good double threat, scramble/run and he has a good arm. That endzone pass in the corner to big boy is gonna be pretty tough to stop. I really think this WOS/NED game is gonna be a really good hard fought game. I cant wait. [/quote] One dimensional... WOS had over 200 yards rushing and 170 passing??? I wonder what game you watched... LOL I have to agree with the block in the back though. Dont know what that was all about... :D

[quote name="fwstangs" post="827800" timestamp="1282313052"] [quote author=Gasilla link=topic=71652.msg827709#msg827709 date=1282275384] [quote author=fwstangs link=topic=71652.msg827512#msg827512 date=1282259556] [quote author=Tyrone_Biggums link=topic=71652.msg826196#msg826196 date=1282009942] Is Friendshood chiming in?  I heard that Dayton tried to schedule and that the mustangs backed out because they didn't want to get beat down this year.   [/quote] Right - after 6 straight wins we backed out!! We were supposed to get beat down the last 3 years. But Dayton does not play well early in the year, so we decided to play Angleton. No fella - the schedules changed because of redistricting. If we were running from a fight, you think we would have scheduled Angleton?? They are better than Dayton this year I think. [/quote] Soooooooooo... FW has a sure win against WOS based on how we played in a first scrimmage against Dayton... but Angleton is better than Dayton after getting their teeth kicked in last week by a 3A West Columbia that went 3-7 or 2-8 last year... Hmmmmmm ??? ::) :-\ [/quote] You clearly are not paying attention to my posts. Did I say anything about a sure win?? Did I draw any conclusions from your terrible showing vs Dayton? Do I think Angleton is not any good because they had a subpar showing in their first scrimmage. NO. What I did say is that Angleton is better than Dayton, and we are not running from Dayton. Can you get that? Yes I do think we will beat WOS, team that is supposed to have good speed, very little size and depth. We are a very athletic, strong, fast and disciplined team with good size and depth. Can you stay with me there Gasilla, I know I threw a lot at ya! PS - I had not ready anything about the Angleton vs West Columbia scrimmage, so I went looking. There is a big difference between these two descriptions -1.  Angleton did not play well during the controlled scrimmage where WC kept them from scoring much if any. WC did not score any. In the timed scrimmage - Angleton dominated. 2. Angelton got their teeth kicked in. What I interpreted from the sports reporters that were there, Angelton was very flat, WC was pumped and it was a draw. Once Angleton got fired up, they took it to them as expected. Do your homework Gasilla! PS by all accounts I have read Dayton dominated WOS and WOS dominated poor Vidor. So - using your logic WOS will win the state title!! [/quote] "Columbia held state-ranked Angleton to one TD and FG, while scoring 5 times against the Wildcats. Columbia scored on the first and last play from scrimmage and totaled 4 scores during the scripted portion of the scrimmage. In the 2-15 minute game clock portions of the scrimmage Angleton scored once and also kicked a field goal, while Columbia only managed a single TD." This is from another website and is the bare bones about that scrimmage. Yes that looks pretty much like they were handled pretty good by a 3A team that wasn't very good last year. As for all the other excuses you are posting about that scrimmage, I'm not gonna address because it is obviously full of homerism from some homer writer, [b]if [/b] what you said is even true. [quote author=fwstangs link=topic=71652.msg827800#msg827800 date=1282313052]Did I say anything about a sure win?? [/quote] You have predicted your team to win and you argue about us having more speed, but at the same time assume you are correct about FW being bigger, more discipline, athletic and having more depth... You have not come right out and posted a sure win, but you defnitely insinuate it by your demeanor. Are you able to grasp that? I know that's throwing a lot at you? OK I will spell it out for you because you are one of those who can't recognize your own arrogance... You did not say directly that you are bigger, stronger, as fast and more discipline, but if you mention those things, and feel pretty confident that you are going to win (which you have posted previously) then you must feel that you do have us beat in those areas, right? Hello? [quote author=fwstangs link=topic=71652.msg827800#msg827800 date=1282313052]What I did say is that Angleton is better than Dayton, and we are not running from Dayton. Can you get that?[/quote] No, I don't get that, I understand not running from Dayton, but I don't get you repeatedly mentioning how good Angleton is and even saying they are better than Dayton, when you have nothing to base that on other than to try and prove your argument. Dayton went to the Semi's in 07, Final's in 08 and the Regional finals in 09. What has Angleton done other than perform poorly against a subpar 3A so far? Anyway, I've said enough, I've dealt with your type to many times. You will not see it. It's those dang rose colored glasses... ;D

[quote name="rjn75" post="827857" timestamp="1282317263"] Todays FW teams are completey different!  You cant use 2000 when trying to make a point. [/quote] That is why I prefaced that with the statements, "I have not seen our speed compared to FW" and also put into parenthesis that I realize the last time we played was a long time ago. ;)

[quote name="rjn75" post="827853" timestamp="1282316880"] FW will put up 40+, they will pretty much shut down Wos throughout but will give up a couple scores late with reserves and less intensity.  FW will have too many weapons tha WOS will not have answers for. [/quote] If that happens I will congratulate you guys... If you are wrong DO NOT come back and try to erase this post. If you do I will embarrass you to no end... And I will take sooooo much pleasure in rubbing it in your face!! ;) ;D

FW fans think they are going to win because they are big and have executed well in the past, Panama is merely saying that WOS has a shot because we will be faster. What's the big deal??? Both sides have a reason why they think a team will be successful. I would imagine that WOS [b]IS[/b] probably faster than FW and FW [b]IS[/b] probably bigger than WOS. I don't know why ya'll are getting so excited about it. I never read where he said being faster guaranteed a win, but neither does being bigger and beating Dayton 47 years in a row... ;) I have not seen our speed compared to FW. I do know that when we played them in 2000 (which was a long time ago, I know) we were WAY faster than FW and their players even said so after the game. The game is going to come down, as always, to match ups. Period.

[quote name="rykerx144" post="827710" timestamp="1282275989"] besides the fewer dropped passes are we sure WOS improved that much or just played a weaker team?? [/quote] Vidor is definitely no Dayton no doubt, but WOS moved the ball at will on Vidor. They scored 43 points and had 2 turnovers inside the 10 yd line. They dominated the scrimmage and that's about all you can really ask for, isn't it? No one has claimed state title potential, but yes, there was definite improvement, like it or not.

[quote name="fwstangs" post="827512" timestamp="1282259556"] [quote author=Tyrone_Biggums link=topic=71652.msg826196#msg826196 date=1282009942] Is Friendshood chiming in?  I heard that Dayton tried to schedule and that the mustangs backed out because they didn't want to get beat down this year.  [/quote] Right - after 6 straight wins we backed out!! We were supposed to get beat down the last 3 years. But Dayton does not play well early in the year, so we decided to play Angleton. No fella - the schedules changed because of redistricting. If we were running from a fight, you think we would have scheduled Angleton?? They are better than Dayton this year I think. [/quote] Soooooooooo... FW has a sure win against WOS based on how we played in a first scrimmage against Dayton... but Angleton is better than Dayton after getting their teeth kicked in last week by a 3A West Columbia that went 3-7 or 2-8 last year... Hmmmmmm ??? ::) :-\

[quote name="Bulldog8" post="827702" timestamp="1282274697"] [quote author=Gasilla link=topic=69480.msg827239#msg827239 date=1282226720] Hey Bulldog, you think we could have a league next year. We could play once a week or something. [/quote] Yes, I think we could put something together. Lets get some interest going next April before school lets out and se what we can do. I think it worked out pretty good for our first year. We will make even better next year. Lets keep in touch. [/quote] Sounds good!

[quote name="Hawkeye" post="827691" timestamp="1282274197"] I ain't got a horse in this race  ;D get it? But WOS doesn't have a chance. FW is too big and too strong (and fast)! I've seen them beat us (Dayton) for the last several years and if they have anywhere close to the same team as the last two years it's done. WOS should just look at this game as another scrimmage.   [/quote] LOL... WOS always has a chance...

[quote name="rykerx144" post="827688" timestamp="1282273894"] Someone said Vidor was big??  I guess I missed the big ones.  Definetly the smallest Vidor team Ive seen!! [/quote] Vidor defense was small, but the offensive line was pretty dang big.

[quote name="fwstangs" post="827516" timestamp="1282259966"] [quote author=panamamyers link=topic=71184.msg826172#msg826172 date=1282006271] Again, you're creating an argument that doesn't exist. No one said that speed was going to make WOS beat FW. The point I made was a single, solitary point. WOS can run circles around FW in the speed dept.  I never claimed that one should infer anything from that fact. [/quote] And I am sure you are faster than Lake Travis. Congratulations. What else do you want us to say? Folks are asking who is going to win the game and you keep saying yall are faster. We understand your belief, but again - how do you know you are faster? PS - I think only a couple people have predicted a 20 point win, many others have it close. I have no clue - never seen you play. If Dayton is a gauge, and it may or may not be, then you could be in trouble. But I take scrimmages with a grain of salt. FW scored on every possession against Galveston Ball last year in our scrimmage, and look how well Ball ended up doing! We will only know after the game. But I will be back to talk to Gasilla!! [/quote] Make sure you are because I sure as heck will be!

Not if they play like those Grandma's say they did. Vidor isn't terrible.

I have heard it from a reliable source (2 players great grandmothers) that LCM is in for a long season... ;D

[quote name="rykerx144" post="827649" timestamp="1282271807"] WOS QB looks very good.  Very quick.  He definetly dont have pass protection.  To his credit all his yards gained passing was thrown on the run or on a screen.  That small back 43 is hard to keep up with.  With 5 on one side, 18 on the other, and 43 in the back field who needs protection.   As for Vidor, my Grandmother taught me if you dont have anything nice to say then dont say anything at all!!  So thats all im going to say other than going to be a long year!! [/quote] I didn't see what you saw, apparently. Vidor put some pressure on Garrett early, but as the game progressed he had more time. The line looked better as the game went on. It is just a scrimmage, but what you are looking for right now is progress and I saw a bunch, not only from last week, but from the start of the game to the end. Hopefully, the trend will continue.

[quote name="skipper" post="827417" timestamp="1282249681"] so its still a go but for 5pm [/quote] Ok Skipper, what the hell does that mean? The irginal said Freshman started at 5, does that mean the Varsity is at 5?

Hey Bulldog, you think we could have a league next year. We could play once a week or something.

Polls are just like "Pickem" contests. The established and older polls are going to go with teams that are consistent and established. The newer and less known ones are going to pick a few darkhorses to try and "one up" or gain ground on the older polls. They also have a tendency to pick teams local to the persons making the polls and have an aire of "Homerism"... I don't pay much attention to any polls other than the Coaches Poll. If a coach thinks a team is good or is going to be good, then they probably will be.

So, if I show up with my WOS garb on will that get me a few "high five's"? ;D

Bulldog8, now that I know you, don't tell me that you are one of those old school Bulldog fans who think when other teams do well it was luck but when your team does well it was skill and good coaching, are you? Please say it ain't so... Bulldog fans have come a long way over the last couple of years, we ALL have those one or 2 who just can't be objective, but you didn't strike me as one of those.

Griffin is the QB at Baylor and I think he is a Sophomore, but he also was injured last year and completely blew out his knee. Hard to come back from that.