tvc184

You hit the nail on the head. It was all about appearances in order to keep Trump out of office. The penalty didn’t matter . Just like the sham impeachment in order to say that he was twice impeached. Just like the claims that the Trump Supreme Court was taking away women’s rights. Just like the fake claims of an insurrection. Just like the fake documents case. And why was all of that done? Because they knew four years ago that they would not beat him again. The Dems didn’t waste all of that effort and money on an outgoing one time politician. They knew in 2021 that they likely could not beat Trump again in a straight up election and did everything they could for appearances. They could make claims in the campaign that they knew was coming.Insurrectionist, convicted felon and blah blah blah. The women will reject him! The Hispanics will rise up in unison! (to be fair they did but just not as a Democrats expected) The Blacks won’t support him like the Republicans are claiming! In fact I believe that Trump gained ground in all 50 states. So I would expect you to stick with the convicted felon narrative… after Biden pardons his son’s felony conviction. All of this facade has worked so well for the Democrats. And in 2021 they knew it was coming. Just think, the Democrats, who spent a billion dollars in three months, couldn’t beat a person who was twice impeached and convicted of 34 felonies. Let that sink in while you stick to the narrative. And in 2021 they knew it was coming! 🤣🤣🤣

He was just as excited to end the previous administration as a majority of the people.

Oh yeah, at least another 4 more years of TDS….. leaning towards 8-12 years but at least 4. Maybe you didn’t notice but things were so bad as you claimed in his first term that Trump was able to be convicted of felonies, put Supreme Court justices in that overturned Roe v. Wade (which supposedly made every woman in the country angry with my body my choice) and yet for the first time in two decades was the first Republican to actually get a majority of the vote… and did so convincingly. Progress will be made. You probably like it. I think that I just saw a news story that the border crossing in El Paso, Texas was closed down …..

I feel like Trump will do enough in the first 30 days to keep TDS going for four more years. Headlines June, 2036 leading up to the presidential elections: Trump convicted of 34 felonies stated that………

Elizabeth Warren: For the post 12 years you have said that women don’t belong in combat. Exactly. Quit lowering the standards.

Like all such cases, the Facebook comments are entertaining. I like the comments (so many) where people are demanding answers, we need to be made aware of the circumstances, the police won’t tell us why, this needs to be looked into further, they haven’t said why so something is being covered up, there’s more to the story, etc. No, you don’t need to know what happened. The police probably aren’t going to tell you why and if they do eventually after an arrest, they aren’t likely to give details. It’s on a need to know basis and you don’t need to know. There is always more to the story because neither the police nor the DA typically release such information. The police and DA nightmare is when a justice of the peace releases the information which is legal but can sometimes hamper the investigation.

Anyone watch the video of the Los Angeles Assistant Fire Chief saying that if a person responds to your emergency, you want someone who looks like you? This premise she claims is based on if we look the same, the firefighter would better understand your situation. What situation? Let’s see, a heterosexual White male firefighter finds a woman in a burning house who is suffering smoke inhalation and at risk of death. But wait? Is she a race other than White? What are her pronouns? Is she actually a born female or a transgender female? How long should the male firefighter question her before he can tell if he understands her situation? “I realize that you are at risk of death but I really need to understand your situation”. When answering a follow up situation that the Assistant Fire Chief brought up about whether a woman firefighter could drag a person out of a burning building, her response was, “He got himself in the wrong place if I have to carry him out of a fire”. I wonder if the police could use the same rationale? Maybe the police could say, we realize that you are a victim of a violent assault but before we can assist you, are you concerned that we have a different ethnicity or our pronouns are different? Also note that you should not have gotten yourself into the situation where you were assaulted! So by the Assistant Fire Chief’s own words, the ability to do the job physically is not important. It is knowing and understanding that people being rescued (or perhaps a weak and failed attempt at a rescue) are concerned if the person saving his/her life either looks the same or has the same lifestyle. Heck, maybe a straight Black woman would reject having her life saved if the only rescuer was a transgender male. DEI at its finest….. 😳

Nailed it!

Bucket of Blue Bell? We can call it The Bucket for short.

If overturned, the conviction goes away but the arrest record doesn’t. That is why some people seek to have the record expunged. To get it expunged basically means that it never happened. The record is removed and possibly sealed according to state law.

I am thinking Gulf of Blue Bell…

No, a conviction cannot be expunged for a conviction, depending on state law. I am fairly certain that there is no way to remove a standing conviction If it is overturned on appeal he probably can but it if more like a formality. A person who is arrested for DWI in the case is Dropped or a find a person, not guilty, might want his record expunged because it might look bad on a future job application. Everybody knows what happened to Trump and he is not going to be applying for a job anywhere. A person could choose to believe or not believe in the conviction but merely having a court say ignore this really won’t matter to him. in my opinion ….

I feel the need.. The need for spe…. uhhh, TDS incoming.

Yes. Get ready for the rebuttal.

They got what they wanted. A political kangaroo court in order to say that he was a convicted felon to try and sway the election. It was no different than Nancy Pelosi’s scam impeachment after Trump had left office, in another attempt to keep him out of the White House. They knew back then that he would probably win again and used every trick play to keep him out. Obviously neither worked and might have actually fueled his return to office. WTG Democrats!! 🤣🤣🤣