Jump to content

tvc184

SETXsports Staff
  • Posts

    31,613
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    101

tvc184 last won the day on April 1

tvc184 had the most liked content!

1 Follower

About tvc184

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Nederland

Recent Profile Visitors

21,327 profile views
  1. No matter what else is coming, for the first time in 12 years, Trump will not be on the ticket. That leaves all kinds of possibilities on both sides if the aisle. Trump has dominated the headlines for over a decade. That is unheard of in American political history.
  2. 🤣🤣🤣 Yeah, it’s heck when actual law is bright up! Biased? With your comment, better take a look in the mirror. When looking up bias in the Miriam Webster, dictionary, it shows your SETX Sports icon. Avoiding the question is intriguing however…. šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚
  3. When has Trump been proven to rape women?
  4. What a rally. Nederland had one hit going into the sixth inning. Nederland rallied for three in the bottom of six and two in the bottom of seven to win it 5-4.
  5. After 6: BH 4 runs on 5 hits and Nederland 3 runs on 5 hits.
  6. It won’t matter. Listening to much of the oral arguments it seems clear that the results will be similar to same sex marriages. How do you enforce it? Where do you go back to in history? And in effect, nothing changes. It will be hailed as breaking ground but it will simply allow what has happened since 1868.
  7. Listening to Brown-Jackson’s logic is hard on the brain. You know, if she was in Japan and stole a wallet then the Japanese police would arrest her but if she had her wallet stolen in Japan, she would expect the police to arrest whoever did it. That’s why we need birthright citizenship. 🤣🤣🤣 I guess when you can’t define what a woman is, that’s about as deep as a person can think.
  8. Does this mean that you will not accept a cabinet position?? 🤣
  9. They didn’t specifically mention the presidency but Sauer in his arguments stated that by 2015 there were like 200 or 500 (I don’t remember the numbers) companies in China whose business it is to send women to the US to have babies and then bring them back to China to be raised by their laws and culture. Then they could return later as they were US citizens at birth. One is the follow up questions for his was something like, is there any evidence of that happening or any numbers of people returning or something to that effect. My follow up might have been, it’s only 11 years since 2015. No one born around then is an adult yet.
  10. That was touched on in the oral arguments.
  11. … or they wanted to put the issue to rest.
  12. Yeah, that’s why I think interest balancing may come into play. Interest balancing when I heard it is like safety versus the Second Amendment. One side argues that it is an individual right to possess defense firearms. The other side says that has to be weighed against the safety of the public because of statistics. So if the homicide rate is higher in Chicago, the city can ban the possession of firearms in the interest of safety over individual rights. So government interest is balanced against individual rights. No matter what Elk and Wong Son Ark say, is it more of an interest for consistency as opposed to the original intent. In the oral arguments going on right now it was asked, ā€œwhat about the humanitarian crisis?ā€. Was humanitarian issues of people from other countries intent of the Fourteenth Amendment or was the intent to make sure that African slaves were not denied citizenship after the Dred Scott decision? I don’t thing they writing and debate on the Fourteenth Amendment at that time was about people in other countries who may have bad living conditions. I such an issue would be ludicrous but that was the question just asked. What about the humanitarian crisis….. So no matter what, I think and have thought that the Supreme Court will finally put the issue to rest and simply say if you can make it to US soil at birth, you are a citizen, which in effect changes nothing from the last 150 years. But….. what will they say, if anything, about territories overseas?
  13. If you look at Supreme Court precedent , there is a good case for not having birthright citizenship. I just don’t see it happening. I think interest balancing (which this court doesn’t really subscribe to) may come into play.
  14. I might make it over there. My older brother did 26 years in the Navy and lives in Richmond. I am sure that he will take part. I wish the Battleship Texas was back open to the public but it still has a few months before the final berth is ready in Galveston.
×
×
  • Create New...