tvc184

🤣🤣🤣 You have gone almost as far into the deep end of the pool as the TDS denizens.

Technically no but without a cooperating witness…..

What is the point and what is the governor’s duty to speak on religious locations in a community? A quick search shows that DFW is one of the fastest growing Jewish areas in the country and now has almost 50 synagogues. Should the governor be commenting on the rise of Judaism in the Metroplex?

Shocking!! An oil millionaire gives money to governor of largest oil state in the nation. First time for everything!! 🤣

Even more comedy. I didn’t bring up Trump, you did. To refresh our memory, this was your quote that I answered: Uhhh…yes. Trump has driven divisions that were incomprehensible 15 years ago. Never has such a liar occupied the Oval Office. Never has anyone in the Oval Office, including Nixon been so focused on themselves at the expense of the Constitution, and reason in general for that matter. He is consequential in a bad way. That is why my response was, this thread is about Paxton and Cornyn. Your comment that I answered never mentioned Paxton or Cornyn or anything to do with the topic of the thread. You only mentioned Trump, the Oval Office, Nixon and the Constitution. I understand that it might be hard for you to follow along. When you’re so eaten up with Trump that you completely go off topic and never mention the intent of the thread. It’s okay, what did Trump do this time? Did he hurt your feelings in the SoTU?

The old saying goes, it’s hard to judge a book by its cover. Maybe but not in this case.

This was weeks ago. Another thread on the topic in this forum was started on February 6 and had over 100 comments by February 7. It was locked because of some comments. There is no need to open up another thread after the original was locked.

….. and after they moved from Dallas to Irving.

What video?

Maybe they will decide to drop the name Bears. Indiana Indians? Indiana ICE?

I am guessing maybe Paxton with 43%, Cornyn with 34% and Hunt with the scraps around 20%. Paxton in the run off 54% to 46%.

It certainly not funny that the woman was killed but kind of humorous in the story is that the coroner in the United Kingdom ruled it unlawful. On a Texas law note and we certainly don’t know the facts, they should likely have been charges filed. Killing someone in Texas with criminal negligence, which is basically having your head up your butt, is a felony of Criminal Negligent Homicide. If the father was holding the handgun and shot his daughter, at the very least I don’t see how they did not indict him for at least the criminally negligent homicide.

The point is that Trump’s name was in the article. The father was drunk and they could’ve just as well been arguing whether beans go in Texas chili.

So the Trump administration does an independent review of the shooting and concluded that the agents lied, have been relieved of duty and are facing termination and criminal charges. First, it kind of puts a damper on the continued claim in all law enforcement cases that everything is covered up. Secondly it is apparently the Trump administration that broke the news. I don’t think anyone on any side of an issue has a problem with going after crooked law enforcement officers.

The intent of seizing drug money is use it in law enforcement including community youth support programs. The money does have to be turned in to the government (state/federal) but it mostly (or all depending on the state) has to go back to law enforcement. So a city chief as an example, cannot put it in his pocket. Like all funding it has to go through the city council but earmarked for the police. Much or all of it goes to the federal government who divides it up between the police agencies involved in the seizure.