tvc184

I found the follow up on your first post. The man sued the officer individually for violating his rights. The United States District Court gave a summary judgment that cleared the officer because the man’s rights we’re not violating. That was an easy call before reading the article. While this is hardly interesting, it is a seven year old case. Was it relevant or something happening now or did you just happen to see it?

Obviously you didn’t think arson was covered under 1A. Disrupting a meeting as far as the crime.

The burn and loot stores under the First Amendment it’s a really ridiculous. Nobody has ever been allowed to commit a crime under the protection of the First Amendment. This guy violated the law, he was given opportunity to shut up and failed to do so. Maybe the DA for political purposes as well not accept charges. This is not rocket science.

Kneeled, game, Crosby 31-17

Crosby ball at 20

Intercepted in endzone.

1-10 Crosby 25 3-10 at 1:16

FG attempt is no good

3-4 from 20 pass incomplete 4-4 with timeout at 2:50

Personal foul to Nederland 27 3:50 in game

Crosby back at 50.

Now they takes it back with no flag on field.

Kickoff is covered by Nederland on onside kick.

Crosby 31-17

Sack at 15 Scrambling shovel pass to 1 Sneak for touchdown

Nederland with 2 fd to Crosby 35. Interference in endzone. 1-10 at Crosby 20. 1-8 after pass.

Crosby kickoff from Nederland 45 because of unsportsmanlike on touchdown. Kickoff is chip shot but offsides Crosby. Nederland ball at own 36.

Crosby 31-10

Crosby gets -1 2-10 gets touchdown after tipped ball.

Run to Nederland 9. 1-9

Great open field tackle. 4-3

On 3-2 Crosby gets 4 on run. 1-10 at Nederland 49 1-10 at Nederland 31. 1-10 at 20 3-6 from Nederland 16.

On 4-13, Nederland pass incomplete. Ball over on downs at Crosby 40

Sack at 48 on blitz. On 3-18 Nederland gets 5 on run. end of 3, Crosby 24-10

Nederland scrambling pass to Crosby 36