tvc184

On 3-11 Nederland pass is incomplete. 4-11

Nederland fumbled ball out of bounds at 14 on kickoff

At 11:29 in 1, BH 8-0 after 2 point conversion.

Touchdown run

Long pass to Nederland 5, 1-5

BH takes kickoff into endzone 1-10 at 25

Nederland wins toss and defers. BH to receive.

If you can watch on YouTube

[Hidden Content]

Probably a lot of Nederland Bulldog fans from the Reservation tonight.

It kind of makes you think that they may be leaning toward modifying maybe even doing away with Roe v. Wade.

I thought you were supposed to have three days of water, non-perishable food items and the ability to evacuate if needed. Now I see that all you need is a Covid vaccine and you are prepared for hurricane season. Such a great leader….

….. and you can save some time in your life by not having to check this forum to see if you’re obligated to respond to what interests other people. 😂 I’m glad you have your life back.

Yeah, tpyo. Thinks.

Looks like Dog most his next series deal.

Brian Laundrie found…? [Hidden Content]

So what do you think about Biden when he says you’re not black unless you vote for him?

They already have a place. It is called the average neighborhood.

A passenger jet (not sure if it is a commuter airline or private jet) with 21 people on board crash not long ago. It appears as though everyone survived and only one person claimed injury. I always get tickled with is reporters and their intelligent or logical conclusion. I am assuming that all of them have gone to college. I know it is a broad brush but still… I was watching the live video from the link below. Just looking at the scene and try to draw a logical conclusion, it appears as though the jet ran off the runway. It left skidmarks basically from the end of the runway maybe a couple of hundred yards to a fence and a tree line. It continued on for a good distance after that and came to a rest. The reporter commented, we really can’t tell but the plane must’ve been flying very low and that’s what caused it to hit a fence (that she earlier said might be the 5 to 8 feet high). Lady, if it was flying low, it would not have skidded into the fence. Then she added, I’m not a pilot so I really don’t know what happened. Well I am a pilot and I don’t know what happened either. 😀 [Hidden Content]

OMG!!! How could you use the word “normal” in a situation like this? 🤔 😜 That implies that the other person you were talking to is not normal and if you were implying that the person was not normal you were then……. Haha…. What a world we have created.

I understand that response from the government. Hopefully by now most people know what the saying means or in what seems like the word of the day, the trope. I mean for decorum, you would not want the person saying what it really means. If this is true, the thing that I get out of it is, there must’ve been enough of an issue for them to come out with the order. Were government employees walking around saying, Let’s Go Brandon? If so, that is hilarious.

It’s a shame that people made a choice based on tweets about the opposition.

That is one of the keys to a good investigating officer and certainly some don’t have it, maybe even a majority. If an officer asks a question and never asks a follow-up question(s), he/she just as well be a secretary. Hand the witness a piece of the paper with a basic questions and tell them to fill in the blanks. For example, let’s say a witness is half a block away from this scene. The witness sees a door open and a woman comes out and then makes an assumption on the cause. That may be a natural thing to do as your mind sometimes comes to an immediate conclusion. So the witness tells the investigating officer, I saw a woman thrown for my car. Should that be accepted as what happened or as what the witness saw? What should be the follow-up questions if any? How about….. Did you see the car door come open and the woman come out or just looked up in time to see a woman on the road with the vehicle door open? What is the vehicle moving or just sitting there? If it was moving, was it swerving around as if there was a struggle going on inside the car? Could you tell if the victim put her hands out to try to brace herself after coming out such as a person would normally do if she fell or was pushed or did the woman go head first like a dive? Could you see any movement inside of the vehicle through the back window like hands moving around like a shove or some kind of a fight? Maybe some you could come up with more questions. If I was actually at the scene and depending on how some of those questions were answered, that might lead to others. Another key however is also to not lead a witness. Many people will simply agree with what they were told or you might change the persons opinion on what he saw. that is also why you never interview one witness in front of another. The officer should ask, not give. Yes or no questions are usually, but not always, the wrong way to go. That sounds more like a leading question a lawyer might use at a trial.… 😀 Like an officer should never ask, “So the car was swerving around like there was a fight going on and you saw the person shoved out, right?”.

I will say when an eye witness testimony is good however. It is not looking at a person saying yeah, that’s him. When an officer is speaking with a witness who is not looking at a suspect, and gives a very detailed description, it is pretty important and usually accurate. For example many times and officer will be speaking with a witness and another officer in the area will detain a person. If the author of speaking with a witness gives a detailed description of the suspect and it matches the one being detained, it is fairly significant and reliable. I am not talking about saying, the man was 5’9” with a medium build. I mean when they say some thing like, he is very tall and over 6 foot, very skinny, has a red and white horizontal stripe shirt, a tattoo of the letters AB on the right side of his neck and had blue tennis shoes with the red laces. If all of that matches, in my mind, we’ve got the right guy. Especially if he detained him in the vicinity of the crime which basically puts him at the scene. It kills the alibi such as, I was visiting my cousin in Louisiana and he will sign a statement saying so. Even then it takes something else to convict however it does not take much more, in my opinion.

Eyewitness testimony can be completely unreliable and again as I said, a witness might not be lying. In fact they probably absolutely think they are telling the truth.