tvc184

Nederland punts to mIdfield and TC muffs the punt. Nederland recovered but lengthy discussion with refs make them run the play again with no flag thrown

TC punts on 4-13 Touchback. Nederlan ball at 20 3:31, TC 7-2

Nederland runs fake punt and fails. Ball over on downs to TC at own 47.

Nederland returns free kick to midfield. 1-10 Nederland

At 5:29 in half, TC 7-2

Intentional grounding from ez. Safety Nederland.

Intercepted in ez and returned to 2. TC ball at own 2 6:11

30 yard line TC defensive line is controlling the game Nederland has no ground game but is hitting a few 8-15 yard passes. Timeout with 6:43 in half, TC 7-0 Nederland with 1-10 at TC 20

Ko goes out of bounds. 1-10 from 35

At 10:50 in half TC 7-0

Touchdown pass to corner of ez

TC with 4-5 gets 1-8

TC states at Nederland 45. Run to about Nederland 6 but called back on spot foul to 17 End of 1, 0-0

Fg block recovered at own 30. Nederland drives 51 yards to TC 19, helped by TC personal foul. TC intercepted at 5 and returned to TC 40. 15 more for personal foul.

Nederland gives TC 14 plays and holds. 0-0

TC converts 2 third down and 1 fourth down conversion on 14 play drive touchdown run from 3 is called back for holding Fg is blocked

4-9, punt to TC 27

Ko return to Nederland 25

Nederland to receive after TC defers

That’s why I was thinking about squirrel hunting. We would go out in the national forest and use 22s to hunt and shoot squirrels in the top of the trees. Once it gets past that canopy, no telling where it will come down.

When I am teaching the Penal Code at the police academy, I actually make up a scenario like this to distinguish between Murder, Manslaughter and Criminally Negligent Homicide. If you shoot and kill someone, it could be any of those which range from two years maximum to 99 years. One of the scenarios is that you were shooting a gun and accidentally hit someone a good distance away that you did not even know was there. Fortunately this girl appears to be suffering from a minor injury but it could have been a lot worse.

It says it was from a 22 and nobody heard any shot. It was probably somebody a good distance off shooting at something in a tree, target practicing etc. I think it is squirrel season so it’s probably somebody out there in the woods since a lot of people use a 22. I have not bought .22 rounds in a long time but many years ago there used to be a warning on the box saying that it would travel up to a mile.

Well, if social media users are your standard for medical data, I guess you can use that. Certainly opinions matter but you we’re not talking about opinions when you posted an article and said, “ I stand corrected. It’s a 99% survival rate“. Yes it is, according to Facebook users. Again, there is absolutely nothing in that article from any kind of medical data from any source whatsoever that says Covid has a 99% survival rate.

Yes, I read past the first paragraph. Apparently you did not or maybe you were just scanning it. I can accept that. You probably saw something interesting that fit your agenda and stopped. As you can see from your first paragraph, the 99% comes from, “social media users”. Apparently they are getting some of their data from this forum. Here is a quote from later in the article from the actual author…. “While the exact mortality rate of COVID-19 is still not known, a hypothetical rate of 1% would still result in a massive number of deaths if left to spread unchecked.”. As you can see, they are using a hypothetical rate of 1% to show that even if it was that low, it would still be a serious issue.

I’m kind of afraid to ask the context of that.