tvc184

3 incomplete passes 4-10 punt For 12,yards 1-10 Nederland at Silsbee 30

Silsbee return to own 18

Silsbee 12-7 10:27 in half

36 touchdown screen

Deep pass to Nederland 46 End of 1, Silsbee 12-0

Silsbee goes on 4-5. Defense holding. 4-5/goal Incomplete Nederland ball at own 5

Return to Nederland 28 Ball tipped and intercepted at Nederland 42

At 3:48 in 1, Silsbee 12-0 after 2 point try is again no good

Silsbee mostly killing Nederland on short passes. 45 touchdown pass

Nederland return to own 36 moved to 19 for block in back. Almost 50 run up middle. Nederland goes at 4-1 but motion. 4-6 is intercepted at 10.

YouTube stream

Silsbee starts at own 23. About 25 yard pass with late hit. 30 touchdown called back for holding at about Nederland 16. 1 touchdown run. Try for 2 no good. 6-0 Silsbee

Good enough to “post”.

Nederland wins the toss and defers. Silsbee to receive.

I believe they have already lost this fight. Unless the Supreme Court makes a radical shift in previous rulings, this case is over. As soon as someone files an njunction, and I expect Texas to within a few hours, the case will end. it officially will not end obviously until it goes in the system but effectively the federal mandate will stop.

My theme song, Glory Days by Bruce Springsteen.

The article wraps up saying a statement by the prosecutor, “Make no mistake, we recognize that this case will be difficult to prosecute”. Ya’ think? Yes, charging someone with a homicide that they did not commit, definitely makes it difficult

That is one of the great things about speculation. In 3 quarters of play, WOS managed 130 yards of offense and no touchdowns. In that same time Nederland managed almost 300 yards and 2 touchdowns… but WOS was on the way back. WOS very well might have come back. We will never know… But it sure is great speculating isn’t it?

Always love the Nuremberg Code diatribe.

Hopefully Nederland will get a lot tougher test next week against Silsbee. According to the PA News, Austin had 1 yard of offense last night.

Do you have to administer a test? No. It seems rather silly to go through all the steps and then not asked for one.

I have no thoughts on it. All I know of the case is what was in the article.

According to what I read on the UIL website, the determining factor is the district rules committee. If out of conference like this game, it goes by the committee rules of the home team district. There was no automatic UIL rule on how to handle the situation and they turned it over to the local districts. Whether are the teams are 0-0, 1-0/0-1 depends on the 12 5A II committee decision that was in place already. According to the KLVI announcers, if the game was called in the second half, the score stands. I don’t know if that was just their belief or if they had looked up or had knowledge of the district rules.

Does the same team count the eight years that Obama continued the same policy? Were they peanut brains then or only after Trump took office? Obama took office almost 13 years ago. He could have ended it then completely at his discretion. So why out of the last 20 years, Obama could’ve ended it 13 years ago?