tvc184

Uhhh.... The opposition party is required to hold a vote? I missed that part of the constitution…

There almost is always a settlement. That is the problem with the legal system. You can pay off someone for about a third the price then you could pay to fight it and we are in court. If your homeowner’s insurance defended you while you were being sued and told you that it would cost $100,000 in legal fees with years of depositions and court filings but you would win the case or you could settle out of court for $30,000… Which is the expedient answer? The deep pockets insurance company is going to pay the $30,000 settlement, the lawyer for the plaintiff will get $10,000 of that and in the meantime the person being defended might have been 100% within the civil law but the insurance company has to put up the $30,000 because it is much cheaper just to pay the sometimes (extortion) money. Yes, there are absolutely valid cases but the system is corrupted enough that even if you’re completely correct, you will still likely have to pay either in unbelievable legal fees to prove your innocence of settle out of court just save the money.

I wish... 😀

Here you go. And yes I just looked it back up it is the 14th amendment. Here you go. And yes I just looked it back up and it is the 14th amendment. I like the Oyez site because it cuts a 15 or 20 page document/explanation down to a simple question and a brief answer. In this link you can find what the Supreme Court says is constitutional and what may be modified by the states. Yes it is law. [Hidden Content]

You want me to explain how laws work? I really don’t mind but I thought you might have a grasp at this stage of life. Medical procedures are within the jurisdiction of a state. If the state allows third trimester abortions, that is the law in that state. I really don’t feel like looking up the laws in all 50 states so that you’ll know what each says. Feel free to use Google. The Supreme Court issues caselaw, not statutory law. They rule on what is constitutional and not constitutional. They do not write statutory or criminal law although some people often say that they do… I guess apparently that is because they do not understand the function. A woman sued saying that her constitutional rights were violated, I believe under the 14th amendment. The Supreme Court agreed with her up to a point of viability of the fetus. What that means is a state cannot restrict her right to an abortion for a child who is not viable outside of the womb. Later stages it is up to the states and like I said, each state has its own rules. Is that the written law that you’re looking for because you asked what law was passed and it was passed in 50 different states which set their own limits, per the 10th amendment to the constitution and Roe v. Wade. Prior to Roe v. Wade I believe that most states denied abortions. The Supreme Court came in and said that was unconstitutional within limits. Yes Roe v. Wade is law. It is caselaw telling a government when it cannot do.

Yeah. Also my notification bell is planted over my Home page icon. i can’t seem to win...

The one that says the governor can issue criminal mandates. In this case from what I have read in current sites (and I believe that I made the same comment here or another forum), she was asked to leave the school property for not wearing a mask, she refused. She was trespassing. She then resisted arrest. Going by Texas law only as an example of what Ohio law may be similar to, you cannot even resist an unlawful arrest. So who would convict this woman? Any juror following the law. If it was in Texas, yes the mask is a criminal law.

You’ve gone from masks to abortion. okayyyyy..... Roe v. Wade said that a child that is not viable outside of the womb is a female right to privacy. Once the child can live outside of the womb, it is no longer a right. What you actually have is states making their own laws on abortion, not the federal government. Again, states’ rights. So I again assuming that you want Pelosi and Schumer telling Texas what to do

You say a constitutionalist but SCOTUS ruled in favor of the 10th Amendment on states’ rights. You are for overturning that and have them let the federal dictate all of the rules? All of the rulings that I have seen in reference to health have deferred these decisions to the state. I am assuming that you wanted RBG, Sotomayor and Kagan speakiy for you....

The ones following the law.

That’s the way I read “never”. Just sayin’.....

When we have filed a TRO, it has been two weeks to have a response. Would the injunctive relief be in the form of a Writ of Mandamus since it is a government? I would believe that time frame has passed or it was simply denied.

I am not that familiar as you are (not close) on state civil law. Dirty Harry- “A man’s got to know his limitations.” I have gotten summary judgment (not sure which USC applies) when I was involved as a defendant in federal court. The US magistrate tossed the case with prejudice.

I think there might be a lot of summary judgments...

Maybe I misunderstood it but this was put out as a school bus issue. Was it discussed having private rides to the stadium? I figure that most parents are going anyway.

Wow, buying what?

Two of the biggest words in statutory law or may and shall. May means discretionary and shall means mandatory. A police Officer “may” enforce emergency management orders. It is not mandatory.

And kind of on the same topic. I have found 2 SCOTUS cases that say mandatory vaccines are legal and 2 SCOTUS cases that say quarantines are legal under the 10th Amendment on states’ rights. The states have a policing ability to protect its citizens by mandating non-voluntary actions. I would think if you could mandate jabbing someone with a needle, you could require a mask.

Not so indirect..... 😂 i wouldn’t say not smart, just uninformed. Lots of YouTube and Facebook legal experts...

I agree. Great topic. I have made more posts in half an hour than I usually make all week On a side note, I never knew how many lawyers and police officers were in this forum. I am impressed. 😀

About 99.5% of the time we would never hear of these cases because they would not exist.

Apples to Toyotas. That was a federal civil rights violation by age, sex, race, national origin or religion. It was not over a school’s authority to make rules without state permission No government (state, federal, county, city, school district, etc.) can make discriminatory rules or laws. During the debate on this subject I made the point that I believed that he would win in federal court over civil rights.

Speaking of Einstein, you might want to peruse Chapter 418 of the Government Code. [Hidden Content]

The mask is to keep you from spitting on other people. Surgeons wear masks to keep from infecting the patient, not the other way around.

Or even TX, wrong there also. 😀