tvc184

They have already weighed in with the case US v Nixon (1974)

.... therefore Biden (not surprisingly) was wrong.

That has always been the law. If no sign, you could carry in a church with a license. The bill signed by Abbott reduced it from a felony to a misdemeanor but still a crime. Also signed by Abbott was a law that allows a church to have voluntarily security without having to declare themselves a security company. Churches for years have had members doing security but an issue was brought up if that was illegal (I think it is questionable at best) since a security company Texas needs a license. That new law settles the question by simply exempting them from a license.

Not that it is shocking but Biden is wrong. Abbott did not sign a bill into law giving the ability to legally carry in a church. That has been the law since the mid-90s. Stunned... right? 😂

Impeach means to accuse. So the Dems have made an accusation. Along comes Pelosi wanting to dictate how the Senate will try the case or even if they will. In 1993 the case of (federal judge) Nixon v. US, SCOTUS noted that the Constitution forbids them from reviewing the process . So even SCOTUS cannot dictate or rule on how the Senate conducts a trial. In the ruling SCOTUS (quoting the Constitution) that the “Senate shall have sole power” to try any impeachment. So SCOTUS says that even they cannot step in (nonjusticiable) but Pelosi thinks she can. SCOTUS has essentially negated the second article and I think it was in US v. Nixon (president) that contempt of Congress had to go through a US Attorney and that Congress has no such authority to hold someone criminally or civilly in contempt. That again appears to negate article two of obstruction. So we have at least two SCOTUS cases that negate obstruction and at least one the reaffirms the Constitution whereas only the Senate can set the rules for trying the case and even SCOTUS can’t step in. Oh yeah...... what was the vote count? 9-0. Yep, a unanimous SCOTUS said that they basically have no dog in the hunt. Yes, it is nothing more than a comedy show authored by the Dems with no direct evidence and a couple of constitutional violations along the way.

District Attorney: Officer did you witness the crime? Officer: No. DA: Do you have any evidence of the crime? Officer: No. DA: Do you believe the defendant is Guilty? Officer: Absolutely! DA: The prosecution rests Your Honor.

Oh yeah.. ... you would never get someone to admit it but that is the reason that I believe some ISDs (or most) have their own police departments.

I think every job has stuff that the public doesn’t see. Schools are no different. Cheaters, crooks, affairs, lies, good people, bad people and so on. No one wants to air their dirty laundry. I have worked security in schools many times over more than 30 years and have seen plenty. While some of it would really have people wagging their tongues, I can’t say that I haven’t seen the same elsewhere.

Kneeling game

Fumbled snap. Ball over on downs

P inc. 4-1 0:33

3-1 0:42 at PNG 9 PNG 27-21

Now timeout PNG

At PNG 9

R for 6. 3-1 0:42 timeout Nederland

R for 3. 2-7

R for 16. 1-10 at PNG 15

P inc in end zone 2-10 1:26 in game PNG 27-21

P for 12. 3-1 R for 4. 1-10 1:36

Motion. 1-15 2:48 R for 3. 2-13 2:05

At PNG 44

R for 7. 1-10 2:59

R for 7. 2-3 3:20

P inc. 4-8 flag for personal foul PNG 1-10 3:47

R for -3. 2-13 P for 5. 3-8