tvc184

kick no good but roughing kicker. Change to 2 point is no good. But wait, off sides. Third attempt at pat coming. Qb sneak good. At 2:31 in 1, wos 15-0

R1. 2-9 from Nederland 15 Pick 6

Under extreme pressure it is thrown up for grabs, incomplete. Turnover on downs to Nederland

R3. 4-6

R1. 2-9 P dropped over middle. 3-9

Procedure wos. 1-15 R11. 2-4 screen 24. 1-10 at Nederland 19

P to midfield. 1-10

Punt to wos 30, returned to own 33. 1-10 wos 6:52 in 1st. Wos 7-0

R4. 2-6 R2. 3-4 P incomplete. 4-4. Receiver got 2 yards past defender but overthrown

Screen 5. 2-5 R1. 3-4 P5. 1-10 at Nederland 31

Nederland fumbles kickoff at own 20 but recovers. 1-10 Nederland

10:16

At 10:47 in 1st

Wos 7-0

R touchdown

Motion 1-15 pass into good coverage for 1-goal at 2

P8 2-2 R15 1-10 at Nederland 3

Kickoff returned to wos 47 1-10 Wos

Nederland to kick.

Festivities starting. Intro to cheerleaders..... i guess the season will get off on time.

I hear you and you have the constitutional right to pray where you want but unfortunately they have the authority to have a person removed or arrested for trespassing. I quit donating to the RC a long time ago. I used to give regularly for years but they crossed the line for me more than once. I know they help some people but I didn't like their policies and way they chose who and when to hand out their services.

Had donuts for me.............

Like the then Justice of the Peace?

The last time that I went dove hunting, I thought the game warden was going to arrest me.

This is not really hard to follow but I will type slowly....... This was my post that hippy was agreeing with on Arnold getting his job back....... >>>>>I am not sure which of his fellow officers that you spoke with but I spoke to several and they all supported him. Maybe we know a different group of officers............. An arbitrator gave Arnold his job back saying that his rights were denied. The city paid him off to leave. A copy of Bartman's ruling states,....... "The grievant is exonerated on all charges. The city of Orange, Texas violated state and federal law when it deprived Capt. Arnold of his 'due process rights.' The indefinite suspension is reversed and the disciplinary reinstatement of Captain Arnold is so ordered. As to remedy, he will be restored to his position and made whole for all benefits and credits in accordance with Texas Local Government Code 143.053(f)."<<<<< As I stated, Arnold won his arbitration and when the city appealed, they paid him $600,000 not to come back. If the city was sure of a victory on appeal, why pay him more than half a million dollars in settlement? They gave him 10 year's salary to agree to not get his job back. Of course the city could have rolled the dice and gone to a trial but I think they saw the writing on the wall that they very well might have to give him back pay and reinstate him so they paid him off... which is exactly what I stated in my first post. You stated in a post that I quoted that his fellow officers did not support him. I disagreed as I know most of his fellow officers and several told me differently. You then posted the above article to back up your premise This is a quote from your article that you have cited to back up your statement. "Several officers dropped in to support Arnold.". So let's see, you say that he didn't get his job back but I say that he did and the city settled with him to not come back. His firing was never upheld. You also stated that his fellow officers did not support him and then you cite an article that refutes you own statement and backs up mine that his fellow officers did support him. Thanks for the confirmation.