tvc184

Grogan seems the obvious offensive MVP. A guy that was not a running back comes off of the defense and off of the bench after the #1 running back gets hurt and leads the district. Without him, Nederland's offense does not click. The fact that Nederland has a serious running threat has opened up the entire offense. Nederland is the #1 offense in the district and without Grogan, they drop down to the middle of the pack. If MVP actual does mean the most "valuable" player, it is Grogan.

............. after losing to Lumberton the first game.

Bend but don't break usually won't work against Nederland since they don't really drive the ball. They get in a couple of plays and then score from way out. It had better be just a "don't break" defense. You are probably correct about ball control. Central's best defense against Nederland was their offense. If Vidor can keep Nederland's offense off of the field, it will go a long way to winning. I don't think they are likely to trade scores with Nederland. It should be interesting.

Geez.... first you toss 'em a $10 million stadium and then they want to win also. I guess you just can't please those PNG fans. What are they, 0-2 in the "new" Reservation now?

I am going to say that the winner of the Nederland/Vidor game gets the final playoff spot no matter the outcome of the last game of the season for any team. There are mathematical possibilities for other outcomes (the most likely involving Livingston) but not likely.

I was hoping for a translation but I think that is stretching it.

I hate to do this but... HUH??

Like a mess.

I don't know about that one. Cammack was a vacuum cleaner and if someone went up with him to fight for the ball, he would come down with it. Cardenas might be as good but better?

Speaking of legalese.... I read some of the news stories that the teenagers were "charged" with sexual assault. I am thinking at this point they are charged with nothing. They have been arrested for sexual assault on a probable cause affidavit and a judge gave them bail. As far as I know, the District Attorney has not accepted charges on anyone involved in this case. Being a felony, if they are eventually charged then they have to be indicted by a grand jury. We are speaking some time in the future assuming that it is ever even brought to a grand jury. These accusations may very well be dropped without ever going to a grand jury. My opinion is that they have been charged with nothing at this point and have only been accused by a police officer that completed a probable cause affidavit. Just food for thought when people start saying what should or should not be done in the case.

You get released on bail. The normal way to post bail is to get a bondsman to post a bond guaranteeing the money in your name. That is because most people can't post the entire sum of the bail on the criminal charge. You pay the bondsman a percentage (I think the going rate is 10-15%) and he posts a bond in your name. If you don't show for court, the bondsman has to come up with the cash. An example would be a person being given a bail of $10,000. Most people don't have that kind of cash on hand but many can come up with $1,000 or 10%. They give that amount to the bondsman and he gets you out of jail but guaranteeing the sheriff that he is good for the money if you skip out. The bondsman makes his profit by keeping your $1,000. In reality, bail and bond are used as the same term by the media and the public.

40 years of frustration being released.

And I believe that LCM should be 0-5 overall.

Yes.

No. That would be a rational decision to the problem.

If you don't pay the fee, you lose the phone. A school district can ban all cell phones, pagers, etc. by students at any school event or school property. They can also dispose of the devices or charge up to a $15 fee to get it back. You might not pay to get it back but how many cell phones do you feel like purchasing?

Yeah, that's true. It is also true that when you are ahead 38-7 at the half, it is hard to keep the intensity. Does Central plan on spotting Nederland 31 points at the half again? ;D

I think it depends on what agreement the AD comes into the job with. The admin can set whatever parameters they wish. I am sure that most AD's have some leeway and some have all that they wish. It just depends on where they are offered a job and whose job the district wants to protect.

You Lumberton haters this................you Lumberton haters that. You dirty Lumberton haters you........... HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

www.toupsgraphics.com I am a math teacher, I proofread this over and over before I post, but I know there are still grammar errors found. Just trying to make Friday Night Lights a little more entertaining. Maybe it went over my head but I didn't think etbu was questioning the grammar and only wanted to know who does the writing as in, whose predictions are they.

It has already been discussed on here. It won't be back until next year. You can view the previous thread on it. [Hidden Content]

Not going to happen!!!!!!! central over nederland should be a good one It may or may not be a good one but it will not be an upset no matter which team wins.

Ozen over Lumberton.

You're not wanting to start a rumor.... so you decided to do so to see if it was a rumor. Uh huh.

I think Livingston might be a lot like Dayton. Lumberton got lucky and snuck up on Dayton the first game of the year when Dayton was obviously a better team. Dayton then went on to win the rest of district games, most of them easily. Livingston, after being tripped up by Lumberton, has then taken care of business. Not only "being there" at the end and looking for a playoff spot, they may be in it for the district title. Time will tell but since the loss to Lumberton, they look like they certainly have the potential as much as any other team.