tvc184

Maybe he said it and maybe he didn't. Having dealt with witnesses a few thousand times in my life and career (and in very stressful situations)' date=' sometimes things are not as reported and it does not have to do with the witness lying. You can have three people witness something at the same time and same place and report three different versions of an incident, including statements that they heard. What if the paramedic, in response to a request for a prognosis, said something like, "there is always the possibility that [b']you will never walk again but you will probably be okay". All that Driver heard was "you will never walk again". Those exact words would have been spoken. It just happens that it was not the entire statement and it was taken out of context. A kid is strapped down on a stretcher, in pain and scared to death and all he heard is the “never walk again†part. He isn't lying about what he heard, he just didn't hear the whole statement. You could probably never convince him that he didn't hear it that way. Would you blame Driver if that is all that he heard? But also, would you blame the paramedic without knowing exactly what was said? I am not a medic, I do not know any of them personally and I have no idea who the medic on the chopper was, so I am not defending their profession or his potential actions. I do know that under stress, we hear or see things that are easily taken out of context and misreported. I would think of that possibility before getting too twisted about an incident that may not have occurred at all.

That last PAT was missed also.

Going into the third week of the season, Lumberton is still undefeated. Go Raiders!

With Nederland's kicking game problems, it might be 28-25.

PN-G 24 Silsbee 14

You've got to start somewhere. I would rather win against anyone to start with a new coach than to lose against anyone. You don't end a losing tradition by losing another game but playing it close and calling it a moral victory.

You would think they took Bears and combined it with Mojo. So Bears Mojo is BOJO. I guess that would be too simple so they had to figure out an acronym for it.

It is always hard to judge a program trying to get off to a new start. A new coach always brings high hopes and new enthusiasm so maybe Lumberton can make some progress this year and play competitive football. If they can keep it close, then they have a chance to pull off an upset or two. If they can pull off a couple of upsets, then it is possible to..... No matter what else, there should be new life pumped into the Raiders' faithful this year. Time will tell if they can do something with it. I think they will play some good football at times and make some games interesting. I don't think they are ready to challenge for a playoff spot just yet.

He is a junior.

Never say never. I bet there are a lot of LaMarque fans that thought Nederland would never stay in the game, especially without LaMarque committing a bunch of turnovers.

I saw it on CNN's home page. The video is still up at the moment under the title "Coach decks kid during football game".

Look again. The polls don't say PN-G will make the playoffs. PN-G is listed under Central, Nederland, Ozen and Dayton. That makes them 5th in the district not in the top three. All the poll says is that in the opinion of the staff, the top 5 teams in 22-4A would beat Barbers Hill. I would agree with that opinion at this point.

St. Pius 35 Vidor 10

WO-S in a cakewalk, maybe 42-14-ish. And rah-rah is a shortened version of hoorah-hoorah and has been around for almost as long as football. Old fashioned maybe but a lot of teams use or have used it.

I think slim only because of the district. Lumberton could see a significant improvement and make a serious run at the playoffs and still not get there. Imagine having to play Dayton, PN-G, Central, Ozen and Nederland in a 7 week period. Then toss in games with Vidor and LC-M who might also be making big improvements in their programs. That is a tough way for Lumberton to try to build some type of solid run at the playoffs. I think their best bet might be after next year and hope for a better UIL realignment but I wouldn't hold my breath. The way the UIL does this area and with PA Memorial losing attendance, in two years we might see Memorial added as a 9th team to the district.

In reference to my last post about respect, winning and losing........ All student athletes deserve respect no matter the performance of the team or the individual. What matters is that they have the guts and desire to go out and practice and strive to win. I think I respect players from a losing team more since I am sure it is more difficult to want to play on a team without a winning tradition than it is to play on one that has a good chance at the playoffs and maybe a championship. Imagine putting up with long, hot and hard football practices when you have a good idea that you are not going to make the playoffs, yet you continue to try anyway. It reminds me of one of my favorite quotes. It is a passage from a speech by Teddy Roosevelt and it is called Man in the Arena. I think it does a good job in describing how I feel about the "kids" that play high school sports, especially on losing teams. THE MAN IN THE ARENA "It is not the critic who counts, not the man who points out how the strong man stumbled, or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena; whose face is marred by the dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs and comes short again and again;…. who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions and spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best, knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who, at worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly; so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who know neither victory or defeat." THEODORE ROOSEVELT April 23, 1910

Having watched the posts from the last few weeks, I see a lot of threads talking about “proper credit due", "respect", "underrated", "overrated", etc. A team will get respect or the proper credit when they put a winning team on the field. That is not just for Lumberton but for any team. For a 13 year period (1953-1965), Nederland was in the playoffs 11 times. That was when you had to win district to go to the playoffs. In that time they won 1 state championship, lost in 2 other state championship games and had three other quarterfinal appearances. I will bet Nederland was well respected back in those days. But guess what? That was followed by 22 years out of the playoffs and a mediocre team most of the time. In that time frame Nederland had 7 or more wins in a season only twice. I am sure that they got almost no respect during that stretch. Why should they? A team is judged by its fairly recent history of being competitive. With 22 years of losing, you can't point back to another generation and demand respect; I don't care how good the run was before. The same goes with a good showing in a couple of scrimmages. If you win, respect and proper credit will follow. If you don't, then it will not. It is as simple as that. Lumberton's time will come and they will be competitive in the future (playoffs or not). Maybe it will be this year, maybe another year but it will come….then they will get the respect that seems to be such a hot topic.

If it is posted in public, assume that others will comment and not keep it between only two parties. If it is not open for public comment, then why not carry the conversation in private messages?

It is too cluttered. Good looking helmets are simple yet effective. When you put too much on a helmet' date=' it looks like nothing more than a multi-colored blob on the field. A helmet that you have to hold in your hand in order to see the design is not a good helmet emblem. Helmets like Dayton, PN-G, Nederland, Vidor, WO-S, etc., have simple designs but it represents their team or community. Color scheme goes a long way, especially when copying know helmets such as and the Indianapolis Colts. Sometimes teams use a helmet from a college or pro team but change the colors. Sometimes it looks better but often worse when they try to mate the emblem to established team colors. Originality also helps as long as it is simple. Helmets like PN-G or WO-S come to mind. They show their colors and school name without cluttering the helmet so much as to render it useless on a football field. Lumberton's new helmet is a little better, but still not up there with the better helmets in the district. While the design itself is quite well done, it doesn't lend itself very well on the side of a helmet. Here is the link for the 4A Helmet Bowl-2006. You will see that most of the helmets that won are simple, especially the state champion, Corsicana. Nederland won the best helmet in 22-4A but the raters did mention that 22-4A might be the best helmet district in the state. [url'][Hidden Content]