tvc184

I did not follow the case in the least however if what I read today is true, she claims that he sexually assaulted her in a department store dressing room. There was no report made and no witnesses. Is that true?

The latest poll from the Washington Post and ABC News. To say that they lean left would be an understatement. I don’t think anyone would call them right wing. Polls are a snapshot in time. Will it change with a jury verdict in a lawsuit? But father moment…. Biden approval rating is 36%. Who do you trust more on the economy? Trump 54% Biden 36% Mental shsrpness to be president? Trump 54% Biden 32% Physical condition to serve? Trump 64% Biden 33% If election held today, would vote or likely vote for? Trump 45% (36%/9%) Biden 32% (32%/0%) There is a long way to go but this is not good news for Biden. You can disbelieve a left leaning poll if you wish and even if it’s true, it could certainly change next week. I would say your premise that Biden is starting out with a huge lead is a pie in the sky wishful thinking at best. [Hidden Content]

Money grab.

The law reads that if you face a solid red light (not flashing), you must stop before a clearly marked stop line or if no line, before the crosswalk. Meaning, once you have passed the stop line or crosswalk, you have to proceed. You can’t stop before a line that you have already passed as required by the law. Sec. 544.007 (d) An operator of a vehicle facing only a steady red signal shall stop at a clearly marked stop line. In the absence of a stop line, the operator shall stop before entering the crosswalk on the near side of the intersection. A vehicle that is not turning shall remain standing until an indication to proceed is shown. So what about a vehicle that now has the green light but you were already in the intersection before your light turned red and their light turned green? Or what if you were in the intersection for several seconds but traffic up ahead in your lane stopped, forcing you to remain stranded in the intersection? In either case, if the vehicle with the now green light proceeds and hits you, who is at fault? That is also covered in the same section. Section 544.007 (b) An operator of a vehicle facing a circular green signal may proceed straight or turn right or left unless a sign prohibits the turn. The operator shall, while the signal is exhibited: (1) yield the right-of-way to other vehicles lawfully in the intersection when the signal is exhibited; and (2) stop and yield the right-of-way to pedestrians lawfully in the intersection or an adjacent crosswalk. So the person with the now green light must yield the right of way to vehicles that were lawfully already in the intersection when the light turned green. You can also see that if pedestrians were already in the crosswalk, they have the right away. In fact that goes for all crosswalks even in the middle of a city block. A crosswalk is essentially a stop sign but requires no action on the driver unless there is a pedestrian already in the crosswalk. I have personally heard people make comments like, if I’m driving down the road and there’s no stop sign or red light, I don’t have to stop for pedestrians. Welllllll….. yes you do. To do otherwise might result in a Manslaughter or Aggravated Assault charge. Which leads to another question. What is a crosswalk?

You are coming upon a red light at a wide intersection (5-9 lanes) such as crossing Gulfway Dr in Port Arthur or College St in Beaumont. The light turns yellow but you think you can make it. You get completely into the first lane you are crossing by the light turns red so you cross the last few lanes such the light red. A violation?

Pigs?

For $750,000 to bonding company you might be able to get him out.

I have been saying from the first report of this case, it is clearly Capital Murder. There are several aggravating circumstances that change a Murder to a Capital Murder. This guy committed three of those circumstances. 1. A victim under 10 years old 2. More than one victim 3. During a Burglary If any one can be proven, he is death penalty eligible. I have no clue why this guy has not been accused already with Capital Murder. Obviously, the law requires a grand jury indictment later but probable cause allows the holding of the person. clearly there is probable cause for Capital Murder. With a capital murder charge, bail can be denied. I am breaking this up because of the news articles like the one below. I know they are just reporting but are they really asking questions? This is a quote from that article: If officials have aggravating factors to support Francisco Oropeza's charges, they will be upgraded. San Jacinto County District Attorney Todd Dillon has 90 days to present the case. “IF” officials have aggravating factors??? Why not ask an official if they believe there are aggravating factors? Of course they throw in the not involved defense attorney who concluded, this guy is going to likely get 5 death sentences. I will concur with the attorney’s opinion. [Hidden Content]

I realize most people know this but to refresh our memories… Technically it is not a bond, it is bail. For practicality purposes, most people use the words interchangeably. A judge sets bail as a promise to appear in court. If you post bail, if charges are dropped or if you show up at trial, you get your money back. It’s that simple. Most people can’t afford bail on felonies however. If a person is arrested and gets a $10,000 bail assessed by a judge, most people can’t pull up $10,000 cash or perhaps they have it but don’t want to use $10,000 in a savings account and not have access to it for 2-3 years awaiting trial. Instead they can go to a bondsman. A bondsman acts as a bank and loans the money. I think the going rate is 10% and as high as 15% but I am not sure. If a person has a $10,000 bail, a bondsman will likely get that person out of jail for $1,000. Once you pay the bondsman in cash, your money is gone. It is like taking a loan out at a bank but there is no early payoff benefit. If you buy a car for $30,000 at 5% interest for five years. If you pay it off in one year instead of five, you can save on not having to pay 5% for another four years. With a bondsman, the moment you walk out the door that is yet. If the DA drops the case the next morning, you don’t get you $1,000 back. The bondsman doesn’t run down to the jail at 3AM to hand $10,000 over to a corrections officer. He is a “surety” or is good for it if the arrested person doesn’t show back up for court. It’s kind of like a co-signer. A surety bond is basically Insuance but for a single specific purpose/incident/project. Most surety bonds are probably contracts like if a company hires a construction firm. The company will likely demand that the construction firm purchase a surety bond. If the construction company defaults on the project, the surety bond company has to pay for the damages, the completion of the project, etc. A surety bond for a person getting out of jail works the same way. If the person shows back up in court, no harm no foul and the bondsman got to keep his 10% profit. If a person does not show up, the bondsman as the surety can lose the $10,000 or maybe $200,000 or $1,000,000 or in this Cleveland case, $5,000,000. That is where a Dog The Bounty Hunter comes in. A bondsman who is about to lose $200,000, might pay a 10% finders fee or $20,000 to bring the suspect in. So when a person is arrested, a judge will set bail at his discretion on what he thinks is a fair amount to get the person back to court if he is released. The amount of bail can be appealed as excessive. Since perhaps most people cannot post the amount of bail, they go to an insurance company who will guarantee the court that the accused will show up for trial or he loses the bail amount. That insurance company is a surety bond company or also commonly known as a bondsman. Who would post a $5,000,000 for a mass murder? Hopefully no one. I’m sure if a billionaire’s son was arrested, he would gladly post the $5 million or even pay a bondsman $500,000 to get him out. For the rest of us…… Clear as mud?

Under your scenario… You are indicted for OC-Agg Assault and facing 99 years. They have you stealing a handgun and selling the gun to a 17 year old. That is two state jail felonies with a maximum of two years on each count. Through your attorney they offer to accept guilty pleas in the crimes you actually committed but no deferred adjudication probation and you will testify in court that you sold the gun to one of the suspects and he told you what he was going to do. Or… they will not drop the Aggravated Assault charge but will allow you to plea guilty with a guaranteed sentence of 5 years (minimum for 1st degree felony) and the same testimony deal. Or… the same deal but a 10 year sentence and parole eligible at 5 years. To not take an agreed upon plea, you risk life in prison or up to 99 years, both of which can receive parole in 30 years. The worst plea deal I made up would probably have you home in five years…. You could risk 30 for parole. If it looked like a solid case against you, would you accept any of those deals? But we don’t even know what they really have on anybody. It is interesting to think of what may happen. Some of these later arrests might even have nothing to do with the shooting and just incidental crimes they ran into. Like while investigating where somebody might have gotten a gun, they inadvertently ran across a guy with a stolen credit card, which is a minor felony. And I highly doubt that they would offer immunity but anything is certainly possible.

Obviously I have no clue at all about this serious incident…. Let’s go out on a limb and say some of the people arrested are low level players like in my Organized Crime examples. Like maybe they were not the actual shooters or the getaway driver but have been involved in other more minor crimes with a group. Maybe they made a phone call to let people know that the party was underway. Whatever….. Because of the organized crime law however, the people that may not have actually took part in the shooting itself might be facing up to 99 years in prison. Do anyone think that through a lawyer, they might give up the right to remain silent and cooperate in prosecution in lieu of reduced charges?

Stackin’ ‘em line cord wood…..

BS

I read somewhere about 35 years ago (way before Google) that the FBI, believe from studies some thing like 90% of major crimes were committed by someone under the influence of drugs or alcohol. It did not mean that they were plastered but maybe a guy about to commit a robbery might have two or three beers to take the edge off. Consumed courage….

Also on the Organized Crime law, I have talked about a group of people (called a Combination) committing crimes but they may not know each other. This is the actual law from the Penal Code. Sec. 71.01. DEFINITIONS. In this chapter, (a) "Combination" means three or more persons who collaborate in carrying on criminal activities, although: (1) participants may not know each other's identity; (2) membership in the combination may change from time to time; and (3) participants may stand in a wholesaler-retailer or other arm's-length relationship in illicit distribution operations. You can see that they don’t even have to know each other and the membership can change. It does not have to be a static group of let’s five people in all five people always committing the same crime. That’s why I gave the example in the other thread about a guy breaking into homes another guy is storing the stolen property and a couple other guys help sell the stolen items but don’t even know who stole it or where. A combination goes back to gang laws but all illegal enterprises are not gangs. Just because they don’t have a name, a common hand sign or specific color, etc.. the are still under the gang type laws. A defendant or his attorney cannot make the case, this guy is not in a gang because they don’t have a name or color. The state legislature simplified it by coming up with the term combination where the state doesn’t have to prove that people actually belong to a specific gang.

I mentioned it in the other thread but this is where Organized Crime really could potentially come into play. Failure To Report Felony in this case seems pretty weak. The elements of that crime are that a person witnessed what a reasonable person would believe is a felony resulting in serious injury or death… AND… has a reasonable belief that it has not been reported. I am not sure where they have probable cause that this guy witnessed the crime AND reasonably believe that it had not been reported. Really? It seems like a stretch at best. Anyway, let’s assume just for legal discussion that any person witnessed such a shooting but didn’t report it. That would imply that the person was in a vehicle that was used. Had the person just been in the crowd, he would have reasonably known that 911 had been called.a So he is in the car. Driver? Lookout? It doesn’t even matter under Organized Crime. In fact, if such a person was a driver or a lookout, that would be a direct participant (accomplice which isn’t used in Texas) and there would be no need for the organize crime law. If however the person was in a loose group of people committing any of a whole list of crimes that apply to the Organized Crime law and he was involved in any way, the person could potentially be charged with Organized Crime- Aggravated Assault in a case like this. To make it more clear, let’s say the group of people were breaking into cars, beating people up and stealing checks and forging names. Those are either misdemeanors or low grade felonies like a State Jail felony has a two year maximum sentence. So the person committing low level crimes with this group, can be charged in Organized Crime for the most serious crime committed by members of the group. Maybe that person should only committed a couple of forgeries where nobody got hurt or broke into a car to steal a wallet. He personally might have only committed those crimes where nobody got hurt and they were misdemeanors with a year in jail maximum. Even though he personally did not commit any serious crimes, he could potentially be charged with the shootings and not be facing a year in jail for a crime he actually committed (and failure to report a felony has a one-year maximum) but 99 years. I have no clue who this guy is or if any of that applies to him. All I know is the public information that he was arrested for failing to report a felony which again is a misdemeanor. The situation makes for an interesting scenario on the OC laws though as an example. I’m sure we have all heard the saying, you’re judged by the company you keep. In the case of criminal law, that might be true to the point of a person facing a serious criminal charge for something that they did not even personally commit but were in a group of criminals who did.

Actually (just a point of law) alcohol does legally play a factor in criminal law. Texas law says that the use of alcohol cannot be used as a defense to prosecution however it can be brought up as a mitigating factor in punishment. In this case the guy should be charged with Capital Murder which only has two punishments. Life without parole or execution. A lawyer is legally allowed to bring up intoxication to plea for life in prison. But that is just the law. I agree with your assessment. I just have a hard time getting away from opinions without bring up law. 🤣

I think you are correct, they likely will overturn Chevron. I agree that Chevron needs to be overturned but agencies should and do have rule making authority. It just has to be (or should be if Chevron is overturned) within clear guidelines. In bump stocks, the ATF should have determination authority. If I come up with a newly designed gun tomorrow, who determines if it is a rifle, handgun, machine gun, etc.? Do you convene Congress for every item ever invented or patented? The problem with the bump stock determination is that is doesn’t fit the definition given by Congress (which I believe was the Fifth Circuit ruling). Congress defined a machine gun as a firearm firing more than one shot with a single pull of the trigger. ATF has incorrectly said that a bump stock does that with the single pull but it really doesn’t. The trigger still has to be reset and activated each time. The stock simply assists in it. But no matter, someone has to decide. An example is the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. Like all states, Texas requires a tax for some outdoor activities in the form of a hunting license or fishing license. So who sets the tax rate? The elected Texas legislature? Nope, it’s the TPWD. So how does a non-elected government agency issue legal taxes? It is because the elected legislature gave them that authority. Without such authority, nothing could ever be done. The problem is that the SCOTUS Chevron decision gave federal agencies the right to go outside of strict construction or called the rule of lenity. If a law was so ambiguous that people would scratch their heads and say, we really aren’t sure what that means, Chevron gave agencies the right to fill in the blanks as they saw fit. That is the problem. The rule of strict constitution says that if something is not clearly stated, it can’t be enforced. In the EPA case as an example, Congress had the authority to allow the EPA to regulate emissions. They just can’t make up their own standards which if what the EPA did. Congress didn’t give the EPA the authority to set caps on emissions based on criteria that the EPA wanted. Congress COULD HAVE given that authority and the EPA could do exactly what they did. The problem is that they didn’t. Could they have given the authority to the EPA? Certainly. Did they? No My point is that agencies do have rule making or determination authority, should have and even the setting of guidelines (in the cases such as fishing licenses, even taxes). It just had to be the clear intent of Congress. Chevron gave them leeway to go outside of clear intent.

I think that is a normal belief. I kind of thought he might be taken alive. He is a no morals low life who was intoxicated. He was not a mass murderer or at least, as far as we think of them. This was not a plan to involve a school or a former place of business because he was mad at the world and this was his final justice. We all probably know people with a short temper but this guy’s short temper mixed with intoxication and with his practically no morals whatsoever, caused a terrible scene. Once he was off his high and no longer the big man on campus, he not only surrendered but was cowering under dirty clothes. I was leaning more toward him hiding in some wooded area or swamp and had finally had enough misery and just gave up. He was a powerful man with a gun in his hand and against women and children. I was maybe 70/30 that he would surrender. He thought he was bad when angry but he wasn’t ready for suicide.

There is probably a better than 50/50 (maybe like 90/10) chance of Chevron being overturned and going to the doctrine of strict construction.

Oh yes, it’s Capital Murder. They might not have filed the paperwork yet and give to the grand jury but it is definitely Capital Murder. That is not even debatable unless they have the wrong guy. In fact, he committed Capital Murder three different ways. Capital Murder is Murder with specific circumstances. In this case, Capital Murder special circumstances are l: 1. Killing any person under 10 years of ago. 2. Killing more than 1 person in a single incident. 3. Killing a person while committing a Burglary. If any of those situations apply, it is Capital Murder. Maybe the sheriff means that they just haven’t brought the formal charges yet.

Because it may be interesting….. Organized Crime (OC) is not a crime by itself. OC is an enhancement to certain other crimes if committed with 3 or more persons. The punishment is generally one degree higher than the most serious crime committed. In this case Aggravated Assault is a second degree felony or up to 20 years in prison. By charging OC, it would move the punishment to a first degree felony and up to 99 years maximum. They will probably get indicted for Organized Crime-Aggravated Assault. The Agg Assault with at least 3 people is what allows the enhancement to Organized Crime. What may also be interesting in the OC law, the participants don’t need to know each other. They don’t have to all be in the same room and say, let’s do this. For example…. A guy gets with an acquaintance and says that he wants to start breaking into homes in the daytime when people are at work. He does not need the acquaintance’s help in the burglaries but he wants the acquaintance to hide the stolen property because the acquaintance has a big shed in his backyard. If the acquaintance can help sell the property, he can keep some of the cash. The acquaintance agrees and says that he has a friend with a lot of street contacts who can get rid of the stolen property quickly. The friend in turn has a cousin who will help him. So the first guy starts breaking into homes and stealing various items. He gives it to the acquaintance who has it for a while in the shed. The acquaintance gets with his friend to sell the stolen property. The friend gets his cousin to help him. So the guy that started the whole thing has no clue who the acquaintance’s friend is and he certainly does not know the cousin. In fact, the acquaintance does not know his friend’s cousin. So…. A-Original guy breaking into homes B-the acquaintance C-his friend D-the cousin A knows B only B knows A and C C knows B and D but not A D only knows C B, C and D are knowingly possessing stolen property at some point but take no part in the burglaries. C and D don’t even know who the guy is. Burglary of a Habitation is a second degree felony. Since this involved at least three people, even though they did not all know each other and had no clue where the crimes were being committed, they can all be included in organized crime. The Burglaries can now be enhanced to a first-degree felony carrying that 99 year maximum sentence and….. all 4 can be charged with Organized Crime-Burglary. Since the cousin who is helping to sell the property that he did not know where it came from or who the guy was that stole it, is now face 99 years in prison. THAT…. is the Organized Crime law.

In I think 1971, Nederland beat a high ranked (#1?) Sterling team 3-0 at Bulldog Stadium on a field goal with about 15-20 seconds left in the game. Fifty years ago was a long time for my memory to fade but I always remembered as Houston Sterling. Perhaps it was Baytown Sterling? I think (memory again) Nederland’s kicker was David Burns??

Yeah, pretty much. They present investigations to the attorneys who decide what to do. The police: Take photographs/videos. Collect physical evidence such as drugs, stolen property, etc. Interview witnesses/suspects. Take fingerprints/dna/etc. Etc. Then hand the case file over to the DA… who also has their own police department.

Go to a firearms counter at a big box sporting goods store and listen. 🤣 I have heard things that are completely wrong. I am not talking like an opinion like brand A is better than B. I am talking about wrong. Even a young person at a specialty counter was expected to have some basic knowledge of the product. Not so much any more. I think I have told this story before, but a few years ago I was at Subway sandwich with my partner at work. He ordered a 6 inch sandwich and I ordered a 12 inch sandwich. The conversation went like this: I would like a 12 inch on white bread. We don’t have that. OK give me a 12 inch wheat. We don’t have that. OK, what do you have? We have white, wheat, jalapeño cheese… OK, give me the 12 inch white. We don’t have that. Sir, all we have is 6 inch and foot long sandwiches. We don’t have 12 inch bread. My mistake, give me the foot-long white.