Hupernikomen

[quote name="bulldogs1990" post="1047957" timestamp="1315018176"] Td jasper 21 to 34 [/quote] Nice drive by the Dogs...Cammack cracked me up called them jerks for all the taunting going on after big hits.

Congrats Hornets..way to fight Horns.

Too many turnovers dogs.  Played tough from the sound of it.

This is an important game.  Should really help in showing how the 2 districts measure up as the season plays out.  I think it will be a lot like last year with Cleveland able to keep it close early, but needing some breaks to pull off the upset.

PA Memorial West Brook Livingston LCM Barbers Hill Nederland PNG Vidor Corrigan Camden WOS Anahuac Hardin Jefferson Newton Coldspring Orangefield Woodville Silsbee Hardin Kelly Deweyville Groveton West Sabine Beaumont Legacy Colmesneil West Hardin

[quote name="Daytonfan" post="1042411" timestamp="1314444098"] [quote author=Bulldog92 link=topic=87185.msg1042363#msg1042363 date=1314424392] [quote author=Jbdfan link=topic=87185.msg1042329#msg1042329 date=1314421006] Raidernaytion, how do you like your crow? Roll Ltrain, this was over before it started, and all those other comments yall made. ????? They better give #9 for Lumberton a break or he wont be there in district. And no, that offense will not get yall very far. Not because the offense is that bad, but because your defense won't be able to stop good runners. Your offense needs to score 25-35 a game. Wont happen [/quote] Dude. We won TWO games last year. There's a lot more to do before we can talk noise to anybody. It was a good win, but that's all it was. JUST ONE WIN. Let's focus on Livingston now. They're a good football team and the Dawgs need to be ready... [/quote] yall will not win against Livingston. [/quote] Good thing it is predistrict.  Livingston  has been big and strong the last few years.  This will be a good measuring stick to see how far we truly have come.

This sounds like a good game.

[quote name="Bulldog92" post="1041762" timestamp="1314408383"] [quote author=Long Ball link=topic=87185.msg1041747#msg1041747 date=1314407907] Turnovers, turnovers, turnovers [/quote] That and penalties are killers. Jasper's been bit by those a million times over the years. They've made a couple of mistakes tonight, but they're looking good against what many here on the board thought was a better team. 28-7 at the break... [/quote] After the season we had last year, who can blame anyone for picking against us?

Morrissey pushing it in 21-7 Jasper. 9:37 2nd quarter.

[quote name="BORAM" post="1041641" timestamp="1314405743"] Are we about to see another Kickoff return for a TD for the Dawgs? [/quote] Nope..muffed it and starts at the 12 yard line.

Raiders push it in for a TD.  Nice long drive.

4th and 3..from the Jasper 25... Lumberton get 1st down at 22.

Yeah, Lumberton has a nice drive going.  Inside the Jasper 30..1st and 10.

First play from scrimmage...TD Jasper 13-0  xtra point to come.

Jasper picks up a fumble on the kickoff and return it to the Lumberton 12 yard line.

7-0 Jasper opening kickoff returned for a TD...got to get as many early as we can from I have been reading on here ;)

Katy PA Memorial Barbers Hill Montgomery Dayton @ LCM Jasper Texas High Nederland Bridge City Coldspring East Chambers Liberty Silsbee Huffman Splendora Anahuac Corrigan Camden Deweyville Kountze West Hardin Evadale Woodlands Christian

It is best to learn brain surgery from a successful brain surgeon.  Until U.S. has some success, they will need to look to the outside to show us the way.  Klinsmann certainly falls into that category. 

[quote name="liltex" post="1016721" timestamp="1307370263"] It could be purple turf if you use the same contractor that built Dayton & Cleveland High school.Yep they did they put red brick on the front of DHS and purple on CHS ;D  ;) [/quote] It was Dayton and Tarkington and it was maroon on Dayton's old high school and Purple on Tarkington's old high school.  

Old news.  Been that way since they implemented, hence the reason they are dropping the mandate and defunding it.

I wager that scores of schools will be competing for each others kids for the 1st time the next couple of years.  The state money follows the kid.  The property tax money is a fraction of that and the poster above said is zero for those renting or living with relatives.

[quote name="JohnnyT60" post="1000482" timestamp="1303335658"] [quote author=Hupernikomen link=topic=82980.msg999853#msg999853 date=1303262052] [quote author=JohnnyT60 link=topic=82980.msg999436#msg999436 date=1303225662] Reducing coaching positions has a minimal impact on the budget. Assuming you eliminate 4 positions, that would only reduce your budget by $14,000. At what cost, many of these children look to their coaches for guidance and leadership because they don't get it at home. I see a lot of panick going on, this is a temp economic downfall. Sure the belt needs to be tightend where it can, but no decisions, I repeat, no decisions should be made that have long term effects on campus. The rainy day fund will pick up some this year and administrators will have time to make adjustments going forward. Coaching seems to be the easy target, but really with little impact on the budget. [/quote] [b]4 positions equals more like 200k[/b].  Districts who cut these positions will not be keeping the employee for other purposes.  I am sure that there are many, many coaches who would gladly give up athletics and just stay on in their other roles for the district.  This will not be the case. Somethings to ponder.. In 07-08 Texas was 41st in per pupil spending among the States.  In that same year we were 48th in taxation (sales, income, excess etc.) The year before in 06 Texas came up with a new funding system that reduced everyone's property tax across the state by 1/3rd.  (Federal court cases made them come up with new funding system) --this was to be replaced by a business tax.  (it brings in BILLIONS LESS than what was promised) --they forced your county appraisal district to appraise "fairly" at that same time.  How has that worked out for you?  I now have a lower tax rate and a home that has grown in value @ 50% in the last 5 years.  Do the math and you can see that "tax break" has evaporated. On to the business tax.  [url=[Hidden Content] letter to Perry tells you all need to know.[/url]  (Notice the 2006 date on this one folks, this was our previous Comptroller telling Perry at the fallacy of their plan.) The bottom line is Texas has always expected schools to do more with less and now they are demanding even more with even less and blaming the need for less on anyone they can point a finger at:  over-abundance of administrators, over-abundance or specialists, over-abundance of coaches, and over-abundance of every other position in the district. Why not fund education at a level that the constitution demands?  Of course we have some fluff that can be trimmed.  Every organization does.  Trust me it is being trimmed. Shouldn't we be demanding that the State provide those billions they promised whenever they rewrote the public funding laws?  [/quote] Not if they continue to teach. You are only removing the coaching stipend. All I have read is how cutting coaches will trim the budget. What I have tried to stress is that most, especially the young ones teach also. I don't believe anyone is supporting of cutting teachers. Coaches seem to be the easy targets. yet will result in very little of a budget reduction. [/quote] I agree that no one is supporting the cuts.  Where coaches are going to be squeezed is the situations where they aren't in the classroom or more than are needed are in the gym to man PE classes.  There definitely will be fewer coaches on staffs because many districts have multiple coaches per PE class.  Right or wrong this will be part of the outcome of this budget crunch.  Any perspective coach should heed this warning and make yourself valuable by being able to teach in a regular classroom.  PE jobs are going to be few and far between in the years ahead.

[quote name="JohnnyT60" post="999436" timestamp="1303225662"] Reducing coaching positions has a minimal impact on the budget. Assuming you eliminate 4 positions, that would only reduce your budget by $14,000. At what cost, many of these children look to their coaches for guidance and leadership because they don't get it at home. I see a lot of panick going on, this is a temp economic downfall. Sure the belt needs to be tightend where it can, but no decisions, I repeat, no decisions should be made that have long term effects on campus. The rainy day fund will pick up some this year and administrators will have time to make adjustments going forward. Coaching seems to be the easy target, but really with little impact on the budget. [/quote] 4 positions equals more like 200k.  Districts who cut these positions will not be keeping the employee for other purposes.  I am sure that there are many, many coaches who would gladly give up athletics and just stay on in their other roles for the district.  This will not be the case. Somethings to ponder.. In 07-08 Texas was 41st in per pupil spending among the States.  In that same year we were 48th in taxation (sales, income, excess etc.) The year before in 06 Texas came up with a new funding system that reduced everyone's property tax across the state by 1/3rd.  (Federal court cases made them come up with new funding system) --this was to be replaced by a business tax.  (it brings in BILLIONS LESS than what was promised) --they forced your county appraisal district to appraise "fairly" at that same time.  How has that worked out for you?  I now have a lower tax rate and a home that has grown in value @ 50% in the last 5 years.  Do the math and you can see that "tax break" has evaporated. On to the business tax.  [url=[Hidden Content] letter to Perry tells you all need to know.[/url]  (Notice the 2006 date on this one folks, this was our previous Comptroller telling Perry at the fallacy of their plan.) The bottom line is Texas has always expected schools to do more with less and now they are demanding even more with even less and blaming the need for less on anyone they can point a finger at:  over-abundance of administrators, over-abundance or specialists, over-abundance of coaches, and over-abundance of every other position in the district. Why not fund education at a level that the constitution demands?  Of course we have some fluff that can be trimmed.  Every organization does.  Trust me it is being trimmed. Shouldn't we be demanding that the State provide those billions they promised whenever they rewrote the public funding laws? 

9-3 Jasper top of 6th

[quote name="BluePride152011" post="996565" timestamp="1302659674"] Wow. Not expected. Humbling for Jasper folks that were expecting a win. What went on in this game? [/quote] Sounds like Hudson has their number this year.