thetragichippy

The details are unproven hearsay….. someone can say something, but if there is no evidence to prove it, what good is it. ?

There is another tread somewhere where everyone thinks it is in bad taste. Trump gave an explanation - some understood, some didn't

Because he disagreed with the ruling and will find other avenues? Don't you think you're being a little dramatic? The Biden administration not protecting the Supreme Court Justices and using a heavy hand to prevent their assaults or murders when Roe vs Wade was overturned would be closer to a constitutional crisis than this......but I believe you were silent on that

The Supreme Court said he does not have the power under IEEPA to impose tariffs

I wonder what would happen to me if I started only following policies I agreed with at work??

This Epstein thread really reminds me of the climate issue democrats are so passionate about. 1950's - Greenhouse effect 1980's - Global Warming 2000's - Climate Change The Epstein Files - Initially - This is the end of trump, we got him now. -After first release - They have redacted names to protect Trump - He's in there somewhere -After Latest release - He's covering for his friends.....

They are use to Presidents that do one thing at a time...... Trump knows how to delegate.....He is a master at it. That is why he became wealthy...... Going off a little here, when folks say he used his daddies money to get rich.....The only truth to that is he did inherited a little money.....But if turning a million dollars into several billion were easy, we would have no millionaires, they would all be billionaires.....

There is a list of others….not over by a long shot

My guess no worse than when the Supreme Court turned over Roe versus Wade…..lol

From the President: “Although I firmly disagree with the court's holding today, the decision might not substantially constrain a president's ability to order tariffs going forward." "That's because numerous other federal statutes, which is so true, authorize the president to impose tariffs and might justify most, if not all, of the tariffs issued in this case. Even more tariffs." The Supreme Court DID NOT overrule Tariffs; they merely overruled a particular use of IEEPA Tariffs." This is far from over…..

"wear" it Why do you have to be accusatory because I disagree with you? Is your point that weak?

Pretty childish coming from what I believe is an adult…. I don’t anyone on here that claims they support pedo’s. This is an attention post and most of us see right through it….Do better, I know you have it in you somewhere….

Did Ed tell you that😂

Yeah, not even worth a response

Are you talking about the guy a week or two prior was vandalizing a government vehicle? I do remember that shooting. I still believe there will be no charges filed.