thetragichippy

So I guess you wanted to force another trial? what would of been the proper solution?

There was a meme on Facebook that said "I'm going to respond to every campaign text the day after the election with "Sorry, just got this" 🤣

Your opinion is getting in the way of common sense. - can't have a criminal case without a witness....... You should blame the victims attorneys for not presenting the case well enough to prevent a mistrial.

Do you ever research anything you post? “Protecting a pedophile (pedophile being the democratic talking point of the year) is not true. The case went to trial in June 2025. After four days, the jury deadlocked 7–5 in favor of conviction, producing a mistrial. Prosecutors from Paxton’s office said the victim (by then older) made clear he did not want to testify at a second trial and preferred to move on. Without the child’s testimony, they stated they lacked a viable path to prove the felony elements. Would you had rather they illegally force a child to testify and re-live the tragedy against his will?

So, either Republicans are coming out in opposition to Talarico or Democrats are coming out in opposition of Paxton…… Hardin county is 86% republicans - 🤷🏻‍♂️

No he's had 4 years, Biden tried to erase those 4 years, and now 2 years.... Maybe that is where we differ. I think America is great right now and getting better. You can focus on the negatives, but crime rates are at historic lows, my 401K is rocking, My Son is going to make 6 figures working from home at 25 years old.... My concerns are property tax and insurance (Home and Auto). Those are out of control. My company provides outstanding medical insurance. At the end of the day, Democrats are not going to fix any of those issues, and those issues been around much longer that Trump.

I think so

No - I eat babies for breakfast..... What a random and ridiculous question.

Where you sleeping from 2020 to 2024?

The correct answer

Source for my question? source = my brain

Only Trumps DOJ knows? The previous 2 administrations don't know?

Write in's and third party's are always ineffective. IMO you vote for who is going to effect your life in the most positive way.

If it is legal, fine, but a lot of room in provision § 241….. That fact that Dan J Sullivan asked to be on the ballot as Dan Sullivan, then emailed to be on the ballot as Dan S Sullivan, when flagged, he corrected to Dan J Sullivan. He asked to be a Republican when he has no republican ties, and no normal campaigning…… That along with alleged emails between the two campaigns could give enough evidence to make this illegal. We will know pretty soon when the attorneys start getting attorneys….. The best thing is at a minimum watching this thing backfire and put all the attention on the two Sullivans….

He said 6 sexes…..which may be worse… he then walked that back and said he missed the mark…. Kinda weird to me, because I never missed the mark on sexes,….