thetragichippy

She always post that type of response. No one in this administration WANTED someone to die….but based on both situations, it was completely the fault of rioters, not protestors who caused their own death while it appears committing felony’s.

Another informative article from Shipwreckedcrew

You should really read the link I posted.

CNN is trying to say there is a change in tone😂 There is no change in tone…if you are here illegally, you are gone!

Welp…… Homan made it clear they are not walking away from Minneapolis….Staying until the problem is gone. They will draw down agents ONLY if there is cooperation from local police and jails…. He ALSO mentioned and supported Kristi Noem

So

This is making that CNN story about his ribs seem a little more accurate

@UT alum I put it in the correct forum room for you.

@Big girl is a nurse, so I know she is smart. She should read it as he explains the law and what occurred and it appears he committed 2 felonies before he was shot.....

no paywall - a fairly long read, but it does include still frames from the videos we have and case law….. if you want to hear an opinion from someone who has actually prosecuted use of force cases. @tvc184 - this may be right up your ally, [Hidden Content]#

SHIPWRECKEDCREW on X - a 20 year federal prosecutor removed the paywall on a substack account explaining this situation, what matters based on law. I'm going to post the link later - I was going to copy and pace but it has pictures and still shots from the videos.

Enough evidence to convince a judge to issue a search warrant...... [Hidden Content]

Do people even know what crimes he committed? Now we know today that there was no supporting evidence to support he was there to kill agents. These are all your quotes. They mean absolutely nothing to if the use of deadly force was necessary....However we do know ONE crime he committed - "resisting arrest" or "resisting detainment" or "evading" .....You can't fight the police when they are trying to disarm you.......

So it's ok for ya'll to misquote/misread the laws and make up your own law theory's about what happen, contradicting supreme court cases, yet I can't give the most basic scenario of him NOT breaking the law but the shooting being justified? Sounds like you don't have a good feeling about the agent being guilty if we just look at the law.

I’m impressed, that was hard to read on an iPhone, I can’t imagine typing it😂