thetragichippy

It is almost pointless - her response will be something else you will end up correcting.....

I been waiting for the outrage....... SMH [Hidden Content]

I even numbered my questions so you could answer individually......for your convenience... I was really interested in your answer to #1.

@DCT, if you're missing a post, it was because you posted it under the wrong topic.

I believe I read that striking the boats was discussed with the DOJ and they claimed it was legal. I don’t think another administration would have much luck trying to prosecute someone for something that was deemed legal when it happened…..anyone? That really don’t matter, because Trump can do the same thing Biden did and give pardons to anyone involved.

Yea - my last visit to Nashville will be my last visit. It has completely change last 20 years

Best comment in months!!

She won one county and had 3000 more votes than the last Democrat in that same one county...... Just sit back and watch the spin......lol

So, try and think rational. 1. You want a “list” of all the people that hurt kids. Do you honestly think if this “list” was real, the Biden DOJ would have sat on it for 4 years? Why have you not called specifically for, why have DEMOCRATS not called specifically for Merrick Garland to confirm or deny? 2. For a second, let’s forget about the above. Since no one has been charged or convicted, you think it would wise to release a list of people and claim they sexually abused kids without any evidence? People did go to that island not knowing the pedo stuff….a few easy ones, Stephen Hawkins, Lex Wexner and Naomi Campbell. Who gets to decide which names get released….well, that would be Pam Bondi - 100% of the Democrats voted she could do that. 3. The “victims” (the same victims that said they never seen or heard of Trump being inappropriate) claim they have a list. Why don’t THEY release if they REALLY want justice and not just money. Maybe you can explain how you want this “list” of folks that harmed children and why you are not calling for Garlands head if this “list” exist. I consider myself a pretty common sense guy, if I thought there was really a list, I would want the victims to confirm….and btw, if they KNOW of a crime, Non disclosure agreements cannot legally conceal crimes such ad sex trafficking or assault….so why are the victims not releasing the folks that hurt children? Can you answer any of the above questions?

There are no "files" FYI The bill that was passed HR 4405 had all Democrats voting YES for the bill - So every Democrat voted YES, and all but one Republican voted YES to give Pam Bondi the authority to redact whatever she feels necessary to protect the innocent. So, if you are unhappy with transparency, or think Pam is hiding something, you can blame every Democrat in the house and senate......

I wouldn't say I defended it.....I just understand it.

The good comes out of knowing they why....Unlike Biden, if you just listen to Trump at his almost daily conferences, he explains why he did it.....and Trump didn't pick this guy that UT is upset about, it was brought to him and he agreed to the pardon.

So the President and NY Mayor getting along is not a good thing? I know this may be tough for you, but in your own words tell me why it is a bad thing?

Perhaps you should research the "why" behind it and not just read headlines...... I don't recall you upset or posting about Bidens 2500 drug related pardons, or his 4245 acts of clemency.....the most of ANY President, and he only served one term......he also pardon 6 folks who was convicted of Murder...... When you look at comparisons, your outrage makes ZERO sense.....

you should refrain from name calling.

So a female driver hit them, the a DUALLY hit them while they were talking to the female driver..... That is one heck of a condescendence......

Over a fender bender.....dang

Technically yes.....You broke a rule of name calling. If I was thin skinned, you would receive a warning..... But the irony of making a post for name calling and in that same post you name call......Gezzzzzz

Trump does not like stupid questions

Yup - you don’t get free speech at work. Your job can fire you for something you say….. you ate comparing apples to oranges

This will be tied up in court until he is well out of office.

In some cases, and it appears to vary state by state The statute of limitations did not apply to Jean Carroll's civil case against Donald Trump because she sued under New York's Adult Survivors Act, a law passed in 2022 that created a one-time window for adult sexual assault survivors to file civil lawsuits beyond the normal time limits. The law allowed her to sue for sexual assault (battery) even though the original statute of limitations for that crime had expired. The second lawsuit was also able to move forward with the defamation claims based on statements Trump made after the original filing.

I believe that was civil versus criminal.....

Trump said that the suspect was flown into the United States by the Biden administration in September 2021 and that his status was extended under Biden-era legislation. These folks are hard to vet due to limited information. I'm not sure if he as vetted again or not in 2024, but Biden admin has admitted under oath that not everyone brought over was properly vetted. I think the most disgusting think I have watched in the last couple days is the folks that claim the national guard is a target and should not be visible in Washington DC. I'm not sure the realize what they are saying. Has our country gotten so violent that a national guardsman cannot safely walk down the streets in uniform in the capitol of the USA? If that is true, what does it say about our country? IMO, it says Trump is correct and we DO NEED the national guard. It may be time to clean up.

That is what it is going to be.