thetragichippy

Noticed the only quotes are "great mayor" and the rest is opinion and I actually watched the televised meeting (that was public) and what Lumbertonraiderfan said is 100% fact. You TDS people amaze me with how you think of things. The President and Mayor getting a long is a good thing....

Trump said during his first term that he didn't think it would do America any good to go after Hillary, so he didn't. Some quotes below - You're not the only one who seems to have trouble remembering things in context. "I don't want to hurt the Clintons, I really don't. She went through a lot and suffered greatly in many different ways, and I am not looking to hurt them at all". "I think we have to get the focus of the country into looking forward". "I feel that I want to focus on jobs, I want to focus on health care, I want to focus on the border and immigration and doing a really great immigration bill... And I want to focus on — all of these other things that we've been talking about".

If the economy does not "feel" better, the Democrats have the advantage......I have a feeling after the first of the year, with a new "Powell" , there will be cuts to prime rate, getting mortgage rates under 6%, - that will spark people that have been holding out to sell their homes, increase supply which will lower cost. Energy prices will continue to fall, which effects everything. <id-terms is not in the bag for Democrats just yet.

They're not siding with Comey, they're siding against the administration. Think about it, very seldom do any from the left agree with anything this Administration has done.

I'm not sure this meets "radical Judge" - a radical Judge could have dismissed "WITH Prejudice" and it would be over

They were procedural issues not merit issues....and apparently the Judge knew that because he dismissed "without prejudice", meaning they can and will be indicted again.

As I predicted, so far, more Democrats effected than Republicans…….or Trump And so far, I see no “relief” for the victims

Why is everything compared to the one black President? Are you going to bring up the Brown suit next? Why didn’t you say what if “Bill Clinton” said it…..that may be a bad example since he committed adultery in the oval office with a girl over half his age…… and honestly, Obama ONLY won because of the white vote….PERIOD. His level of criticism is not even in the same atmosphere as what Trump has had to deal with….and being we now know Obama sabotaged Trump in first term, I consider him to be scum and to my knowledge the first President to do something like that.

He has made these comments his entire life, so I’m not sure why you are surprised. In your opinion @Big girl, is calling someone piggy worse than calling someone a Nazi?

No idea - but I think that should be changed,,,,You're social security is just returning the money you paid in .

I went to the store (wal-mart) the other day and got a bag of dog food ($50), 2 different dog treats, gallon of tea, 4 cucumbers, salad dressing, a couple other things I can't remember and it was $130...... In my head I was thinking $80 - not counting dog food, there were only 4 small bags........ That was not a warm and fuzzy feeling

I don't see that happening for a long time. I think a 4.5-5% Mortgage is affordable and possible. Lower is always better BUT, it also gets people to buy a more expensive house because they can afford the note.....Often, what they find is a bigger home is a higher tax bill, higher insurance bill, higher utility bills and higher repair and replacement cost. That big house you got on a "deal" in 20 years will cost you 25K to replace the roof versus 10K or less for a more modern house. These are things Dad preached to me about when I thought I knew everything.....LOL

I feel the things he has put into place will start being felt next year. I believe he will get the 2K tariff stimulus out - lower the prime another .50 - that should put Mortgage rates under 6%, which will get people to start selling there homes......

Welcome to the jungle!

I believe those polls.... He better have a good plan for 2026.....

That entire explanation sounds like an episode of Justified..... That has to be 4 of the dumbest people around.

This is what happens when you have TDS…..you take to heart anything negative about Trump

Why didn’t they just get a competent Judge?

(Credit to SHIPWRECKEDCREW@X) From a real non-biased attorney who understands law So, posting here to see all this playout in real time......But HEY, they got the bill passed in record time🤣 Thomas Massie is a genius. But even though he is on the House Judiciary Committee, he seems to have no actual understanding of how the enforcement of laws work in the criminal context. He told Kaitlin Collins yesterday that if there is a failure to comply with his statute, it will be enforced criminally, and people will go to jail. 1. The only thing the statute does is force the creation of a searchable and downloadable database of materials. 2. The statute orders the Attorney General to create this database. 3. The statute leaves a variety of discretionary judgments to the Attorney General on what documents to include. 4. The statute does not include any provisions that give notice to anyone that non-compliance is a criminal offense. 5. Massie says "their" -- he and Khanna -- method of enforcement will be "legal." But here is the problem that shows how little Massie understands about the law: The obligation to create the database is placed upon the Attorney General. Who is it in the U.S. government that is given the authority to decide when to bring criminal charges and who to charge? Due process under the 5th Amendment requires "Notice and Opportunity to be Heard". Where in the statute is "Notice" provided that non-compliance is potentially a criminal offense?

LOL - I'm not sure why you want this case to be dismissed so bad, if he is guilty.....procedure errors do not make him innocent. I don't want to put words in your mouth officer, but it sounds like you want Trump's DOJ to fail more than you want the law upheld..... And very non-partisan legal experts claim that having the GJ sign the same indictment minus the one charge they voted against does not effect the case..... but it makes a great drama

They are going to be disappointed this bill does not release any grand jury testimony. That always has and still does require a court order - this is just theater....

This is all theater. What are you expecting to be released? The grand jury testimony that requires a court order? Do you want them to stop the current investigation and release those files? I've said this before, if you only want to hear what you want to hear, stay with CNN and all the biased media...... "shipwreckedcrew" on X calls out left and right when they are wrong on legal matters. There is not going to be a smoking gun in these files - and there will be so many redactions, everything will be pure speculation.

Your opinion is based on nothing but hear say and pieces of emails taken out of context. This is looking like a repeat of Russiagate........ Beep Beep....

Remember, it is still Trumps DOJ.....

Your too early to celebrate - it goes to the Senate for debate and vote. If no changes, back to house and to Presidents desk. If they amend it, which is likely, it goes back to house for approval of the amendments.....then to Presidents desk. If unredacted it hurts the victims and innocent people. So we know it will be redacted, that will start speculation and made up stories that may or may not be true......what does that solve? Does that bring any pedo's to justice? Nope....this is NOT about the victims, It will be another attempt to "get Trump".....