Jump to content

thetragichippy

Members
  • Posts

    9,940
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    40

Everything posted by thetragichippy

  1. No it won’t…..lol Ghislaine was at Chelsea’s wedding after Epstein was convicted…..lol Better hurry up and find some solid evidence on Trump…
  2. Victim blaming now? According to me? Where did I say he was a sorry lawyer? I’ll help you, I didn’t. Now there is reporting from the sorry lawyer(your words, not mine) that he had no clue he was being recorded…..this is looking worse and worse… You’re posting just to post with orange man bad attitude….which is not working in this case….again, spend a little time researching
  3. You base your opinion on your opinion? Really? Do you know this lawyer, even his name? His record?
  4. It is at the bottom of he post. He is an ex 20 year DOJ prosecution attorney. He knows the workings of the dept. You proved my point calling out us, when you have no idea either. In another post he points out: In the phone call that was tapped with Wiles, her attorney agreed to the let the FBI tap the call and knew it. Her Lawyer allowed a privileged call to be recorded by a third party. The lawyer broke privilege, which he is not allowed to do. The client (Wiles) has to break the privilege. So while not a crime, it exposes the lawyer to sanction against his license. Since it was privileged, nothing in the call could be used. So the FBI agent/lawyer who set it up was fired, and rightly so. If you are going to claim something, do a little research and from a real lawyer not a lawyer that post for clicks
  5. That is AMAZING.....lol
  6. Not a Paul fan in some things. I believe we are going to see a Vance/Rubio ticket.
  7. That is not at all the same thing. You seem to know all about how the FBI works and what goes into tapping phone lines? Please explain why they are innocent and did not break policy......I even gave you some help of how it all works in my last post....explain away
  8. and you do? The FBI recording of a conversation between Susie Wiles and her attorney when her attorney was aware. In the FBI files there will be multiple forms of documentation about this. This is called "consensual monitoring" -- where one party to the conversation is aware the FBI is listening and recording but the other does not, and the party that is aware agrees to that. The FBI cannot do this on its own. It must seek and obtain approval from a DOJ prosecutor to do so. Some states have laws against one-party consent -- called "Two Party" states -- and require both parties to be aware and agree that the call is going to be monitored and recorded. Others are what is called "One-Party" states. Florida is a Two-Party state -- meaning the call as described was a violation of state law. The FBI is allowed to violate state law while conducting an investigation -- same principle as undercover work. But the attorney involved, if also in Florida and a member of the Florida State Bar, likely is not protected in all respects. The FBI could authorize him to violate Florida law -- but there will be another FBI document showing that as well. That document does not protect him for violations of his ethical obligations that apply to his license. And lets not forget that the FBI only investigates crimes. To get to the point of having a recorded call between a "subject" and that persons attorney, whatever this investigation was has proceeded well down the tracks. Finally, there are a host of DOJ Regulations about the manner in which attorneys can be investigated with regard to allegations of criminal conduct against their clients or others. Finally, you don't just hook up an attorney in a consensually monitored call without having a detailed history recorded in the case file about how you got to that point. It is highly likely this call was going to happen according to a "script" -- the FBI/DOJ had specific issues they wanted the attorney to discuss or ask about. _ShipwreckedCrew Lets see what happens.......
  9. I was hoping you would find a way to put Boykin in this post.....a little disappointed.
  10. What we know is it a plan to pay people directly to buy health insurance….I imagine like an HSA account that can only be used for medical. I contribute to one at work, it is pre-tax so it lowers my taxable income, lowering my tax burden. The details are not out….probably to wisely not lie like Obama and make remarks like “if you like your Doctor you can keep them”. Hopefully the Republican party won’t try and pass it overnight without a single Democratic vote, and read it the next day to see what is in it…… I’m OK not rushing to pass such a complicated issue that effects everyone except the people that won’t ever pay for insurance.
  11. One of the truest comments I’ve seen on this forum in a hot minute.
  12. I agree that 2020 election made no sense
  13. I have not heard anything. My guess (@tvc184) would know better, but I bet money and the best lawyers are going to delay this thing as long as possible..
  14. According to ChatGPT, 80% of Presidents that have house and senate majority starting their second term have lost both House and Senate at midterms. So, it will be the norm not just on Trump - but it will be ALL ON TRUMP if he DOES manage to hold House and Senate..... History has him a 20% chance of doing so and a 80% chance of not......
  15. Explain your post
  16. It’s funny that Bill Maher liked him after he met him. I hear that a lot from people that meet him find him friendly and nice. Honestly, I find him interesting. While I don’t agree with some of the stuff he says, he is one tough dude. Has ANYONE had 3 bad years where you were gone after criminally in all directions, multiple states with a possibility of spending the rest of your life in jail, all while your family is being threatened with jail time, while running again for the highest office in the world…..then during a campaign rally you get your ear shot off, then standup not knowing if another shot would kill you, scream fight? That is a heck of a few years and to come out on top….well, we will never see that again in any of our lifetimes…..
  17. CNN admitted Trumps numbers moved 10% UP after his speech. so, BREAKING NEWS - the folks on here that hated Trump before the speech still hate Trump after…..
  18. Lol My soul is fine, just fine.
  19. Does not apply to me - I don't own this site - so no irony Secondly - he was not the one wearing the F badge at the SOTU......and maybe you can point out when Trump gave the finger to the press in front of children......I've never heard about that or seen it
  20. I'm doing fine. I have the same a 401K as a small pension but I will be fine. I think the majority of the problem with America is we are not taught how to save. Since I was 25 I have worked in Banking and Retail. If I would of started saving in my 401K (everywhere I have worked has offered 401K) 10-15% instead of what the company matched (and never touched it) - I would not be working right now. The problem is I didn't and most don't. I started in time, but a lot don't and depend on SS. I had a conversation with a 27 year old electrician who had 75K in his checking account. He also has a 401K that he only contributes the match and a Roth. I gave him some sound advice and I hope he takes it because he is doing well, bought a house 6 months ago. He is on track to retire at 50 if he keeps it up. For some people the economy will never be good. I have an old friend that has made 150K to 60K a year - and no matter what, he is always broke......BUT, always a hoot to party with ,,,,,LOL
  21. It speaks volumes for the folks that vote her into office. She feels it won't bother them. It didn't bother me - I actually laughed at it since Trump has had great success with ICE and the border.
  22. Maybe that is your issue. You don't understand that you are describing two completely different things. Supporting a President has nothing to do with rules in a PRIVATE forum. The First Amendment is not recognized in this forum as well. I'm not sure when it changed, but using ** to leave out words in a curse word were also against the rules. They lightened up a little .
  23. For Trump that was a solid speech. I would have stayed positive and ignored and not called out the Democrats. I, like everyone on this page, have never ran for President or been elected twice to become President. So, maybe calling out the Democrats for sitting and not applauding for victims will help him at mid-terms. He apparently knows what works.....
  24. I can only react to what I see, so if you don’t care, I don’t care…..because he was not talking to me……
×
×
  • Create New...