thetragichippy

    Do you say that with the same confidence as when you said Chargois was untouchable and staying?

 We didn't do anything as bad as El Paso or other districts that were taken over.   That statement is exactly why he should be out.......

lost me with the raisin

Changing his name?

and I sure am glad my kid is 13

  No.....it should be majority rule   I still want to know why she picked teaching........   and why she is not flying.....   and it looks like the public has decided that 5th grade is an appropriate age to talk about transgender... 

  Joking aside.....I agree   Looks like BISD gets a fresh start!

That kinda thing happens when you talk out of the "wrong end"

Looks like someone forgot to tell the TEA he was untouchable.

Something else I don't believe has been brought up.....   She is teaching because she needs the income.......his/her words......   She is an accomplished pilot that has a teaching license.......    I wonder why she/he is not flying......surely He/she would make more money doing that......if he needs an income.....   Who would fly with him/her?

  It amazes me that educated people can't think their way out of a shoebox sometimes...   If the administration received complaints from parents and felt like the teacher was causing issues, all they had to do was not call her.......   But they had to make it an issue.......I guess LISD had to do their part to make BISD feel better :P

  Bullets, we talked off line and you know my stance.....I don't hate her, would of wanted to know before my son found out by another kid...and I thought LISD handled it wrong......BUT   What is your stance on the rest of my comments?  The part about legally a female with male parts.....and dress code.   One other thing.....shouldn't a parent have a say in what their child is exposed to?

Am I the only one who just don't understand?   I teach my kid to accept everyone, don't be judgmental etc...   Here is my issue (even though I still stand behind how I would have handled this in my earlier post.....you don't have to agree with something to do the right thing)   For the sake of my discussion we are going to call him a He....as I understand he still has male anatomy.   He claims he has legal papers that he is a woman. He has taken some medication and is wanting in the FUTURE to have a sex change. So, in my opinion, he is still male. How can he legally be considered a female with male parts?   So, do we have a male teacher dressing up like a female?   Does this open up that male students can now dress up like women if they want? Can they wear makeup or earrings?     I guess I'm confused.....

I have a weird feeling this is not over.........  

  yes,,,but it appears LISD didn't want BISD hogging up all that free press, so they made it a controversial issue when it was a simple fix........

  HA!    and thanx!

  Like I have said many times....unlike others, I don't get on here and defend my school district because they are like me.......   I think they handled this completely wrong......Had I been in charge....   1.  If LISD decided we didn't want her back....I would have let her complete whatever schedule she had and not called her back (she is on a list with other subs) ...end of problem.   2.  If LISD agreed she should teach, she would still be on the list and she could be called.....   Note....there is no discrimination case according to the laws I have looked up.....but if they fire her, there will probably be a case and it may be a huge mistake for the district......   They should of handled it like I said and we wouldn't be having this conversation.......   Oh yea......GO RAIDERS :D

Michael Williams told BISD callers that Superintendent Timothy Chargois would likely not stay on the district's payroll if the state appoints managers

  The TEA faulted Chargois......read the TEA report....McCraney stole money when Thomas was in charge.....soooo, apparently Thomas didn't notice the fraud.....or did he turn his head?

  And something else.......According to the TEA, The current superintendent Dr.  Chargois did not supervise the daily operations of the district, leaving them open for all this fraud. This fraud was going on when Dr. Thomas was in charge, making him just as responsible as Chargois.....and actually MORE responsible because Chargois was just letting the district run on the policies (or lack of) that Thomas had put into play.

Boasting that someone is untouchable..... And we wonder why BISD is in this mess

  So, if you did not provide the alcohol but were there....you can be charged because you didn't call police?

  OK....we need an Admin and quick!! Someone has stoled :P  Doves idenity and posting things that make sense!!! 

  She is a He right now.......