thetragichippy

  Maybe.....or here we go again believing the rumor mill and "eye witness" testimony......

[Hidden Content]   This is nuts......Hope he gets a long slow death,....

Biggirl....apparently math was not your strongest subject......   Percent wise,  2,777 people out of 223.6 million is not as big of a problem as 2,459 out of 38.9 million......   If that was lotto chances, I would go with the last one.....

Good question.....

I will keep mine concealed.......   I like the element of surprise if I have to use it. 

PamFam10....you must of missed the fact that I was responding to big girl......Who was the first one to bring up "you are quick to call black guys thugs" , then brought up people calling Trayvon a thug, then about the 87% of whites kill whites.....I was just educating her on what SHE brought up.....   To my knowledge, and please post it if you can find it, no one has taken up for the bikers or thugs or criminals or whatever you want to call them. No one has said white thugs are better than black thugs.   Point is, you act like a thug, you may die like one.......It is ALL about choices....

In 2010, there was 3,332 white victims of murder......whites were responsible for 2,777 and blacks were responsible for 447. Same year, there were 2,720 blacks murdered.....whites were responsible for 218 and blacks responsible for 2,459...... Now, let's look at populations in 2010......White population was 223.6 million versus a black population of 38.9 million........There are over 5 times more whites than blacks, yet the number of blacks killed by blacks is almost as high as whites killed by whites...... Gig Girl, that is just the facts [Hidden Content]

There were 170 bikers charged with I believe a 1 million dollar bond on each person.....and I believe the charge is capital murder.....   Now, if anyone thinks the law is taking it easy on these folks, they are crazy.   Looks like to me these white thugs got exactly what they asked for.......That was not the case in Baltimore....they got a free pass to riot and loot.......   Looks like Texas is 2 for 2.......Two terrorist and several dangerous bikers will not be around to kill people......   Don't mess with Texas :ph34r:

  My apologies if I misunderstood your references.....   I just didn't see how public looting and burning down a CVS compared to two biker gangs having a shoot out. 

  This is stupid.....   Have any cops taken any military style items and gone rogue?   Just a political move.....

Why are we even trying to compare black versus white? There are drive by's daily by black gangs and they don't always make the news....   I don't see ANYONE trying to take up for or "understand" the violence. I don't see anyone supporting any of the biker gangs.....   The only comment I have seen is "they got what they had coming to them. "   And yes, criminal biker gangs typically have "thugs" in them.     Also, we are in America and have a right to assemble.....I don't buy the police and them blaming Twin Peaks for not closing.  Would that not be profiling if they closed because of what someone looked like?   We should blame the ones that started the violence,....

RIP   His signature licks and style will remain in music forever.

  When your son is judged because of the way he "looks" with no evidence, remember our conversation. Maybe someone will think he is guilty with no evidence (like you with Zimmerman) and your Son will spend a few years in jail......   Then maybe you will understand what facts and evidence mean.....and everyone has a right to a fair trial.....

  Seriously??   I have never said that.    You really have a problem. 

  It is a rewarding job as was the ambulance service. I had the good fortune of working with some great officers. When you get to know them, they are normal people with normal lives outside the job....   Now, there are a few that will open their trunk(on their personal vehicle) and pull out automatic weapons at a State park.......but other than those :P

  We actually agree.......

  Because you think he murdered Trayvon? I can honestly say by your comments on other post, you have not read one court document about this case or any others. You use opinion articles to make your decisions......Thank God we have a court system in place or we would be executing people all the time based on opinion.....   I bet you could not tell me what the defense said occurred versus what the prosecution said......   And the only thing I have defended is his RIGHTS. He had a right to a trial and he was judged innocent....   I took you as someone that was all about equal rights......weird.

  I agree with you 100%, but it goes back to risk versus reward.....   I, along with most people, do not care about drawing a cartoon to purposely upset the radical Muslim groups, even though I have every legal right to do so. I certainly am not going to risk my life to participate because if I don't they will find another place to attack.   Last time, I support her right to do it, I support anyone who wants to do it, but me personally, I think it's stupid and really serves no purpose. If I won first place in the Muhammad Art cartoon contest, that would not be a trophy I would put on the mantel......that would not even be a story I would tell at a bar......drunk....

  Which definition are you using?

  TVC talked you into becoming a cop?   lol......Congrats....you will make a good one!

  What exactly did I say that would make you think I was pulling a strawman.......nothing I said was untrue.....and there is a chance she could hold another contest.....so, my question is legitimate....and Garland is only 4 hours away......

  OK....I'll play your game.   Your "question" "what good is having a right if you cannot or do not exercise that right????"  Your rights should not be taken away. She had EVERY right to have that contest.  Because we are a free country, we are FREE to USE our rights or to not use them.  I am thankful that my girlfriend does not use her right to walk around topless.  So, I think I answered your question.....   Now answer mine.......   If she does it again with no security, would you participate and bring your family?

  Women have a right to go topless in Texas........   I also said she had a legal right.......   Let me ask you something.....   If she does it again with no security, would you participate and bring your family?   Me personally.....I would not. To me, drawing a picture of someone I don't believe in would not be worth the POSSIBLE risk. That does not take away my right to do so, I just choose to be cautious because I love my family.    I would hate to say, I lost my family to a terrorist because I wanted to piss him off and make fun of their God.......because I had the legal right.

  This statement tells volumes about your character.....

10 pages about this and you are still talking in circles.   I think we all agree she had a legal right to do that.....   I also agree it was not the smartest thing to do and she knew the risk. If that amazing cop would have missed and gotten killed, they would of had time to wipe out the entire place.....   There comes a time when the risk may not be worth the reward.......just because you can, doesn't mean you should......