UNLV

Said it before, Lamar is third in line...I do not think the Regents would let them to move up unless Sam Houston State was moving up. First, I think SHSU is moving up. Second, if SHSU didn't move up that has nothing to do with Lamar.

If SELA lose2, then they would be the 7th seed. If SELA beat LU, and UTSA lose 2, then SELA face Lamar again in the first round. I know they dont want that, so they might lose to LAMAR ON PURPPOSE.

UTSA most likely 8th seed. UTA most likely 7th... Lamar and SFA fighting to play UTSA because UTA is dangerous.

NW st most likely wins...NW st 4th place. SHSU needs 1 out of 2 for 3rd...SHSU 3rd SELA and Mcneese fighting for 5th and 6th. NW st clearly easier so will they will be in must win mode.

Lamar has Nichols(A team that is out), SELA NW st has UCA(OUT).............NW st needs a win for 4th place SELU has @ Mcneese and Lamar... fighting for 5th Mcneese has SELA and @Nichols.. fighting for 5th SFA has CC and @UTSA SHSU has UTSA and @CC.. fighting for 5th UTSA has @SHSU and SFA UTA has @Texas st Lamar fans...Lamar needs to win out and pull for UTA to beat UTSA.

Well I was thinking of it from UCA's point of view. It's nice to have a rival in your conference. BUT, in reality, we can lose TxSU and I would rather NOT bring in another football school, because you guy's will keep us at 8 SLC teams in FB, which is THE perfect number with an 11 game schedule. Still gives us 4 OOC games. We need 1 big guarantee FBS game for a pay check to pay some bills. Then we can have a couple of nice home and homes with some quality Top 16 type of FCS teams to keep our fans happy. Then we still have an extra game to maybe bring in a D-II for a rent a win. and a 6th home game to keep the season ticket holders satisfied. TAM-CC says they want to start football soon after 2011, so we should hold a spot for them just in case. That would hurt our home and home scheduling with quality OOC FCS teams. But we could live with it. 8 Conference games is perfect. 9 is OK, 10 is 2 too many in an eleven game season. I wouldn't bet on Lamar being FCS long term....

What...not a big fan of the "red beans and rice bowl" are whatever it is you call the UCA-McN game? Once Lamar joins, every team will have a nice rivalry game to finish the season except UCA... McN vs Lamar (Sabine River Showdown) TxSt vs SHSU (K©at Fight) SFA vs NWST (Chief Caddo) SELA vs Nich (Cajun Corner Game -- River Bell) Yea, the UCA fans are nice, but there is nothing natural about that game with us at the end of the season. McNeese hasn't really had a rivalry since USL moved out of the SLC in the mid 80's. Once we all stop holding TxSU back and they go to the land of "Big Time" (HA!), I'd like to see the SLC add another Arkansas team or maybe Delta St. if they can improve their facilities. That will give UCA a natural rival too. Delta st is in Mississippi... Tarleton is next to get in. Followed by West Texas A&M..Amarillo market.

Very true...Shrink those big heads...

Only 3 shots, 4 pts, for Dawkins.

If only Lamar had hit there ft...

DANG......

Mcneese is doing everything right, Lamar doing everything wrong.

its like a joke...

10 blocks on Lamar

75-65...SFA loses....

60-45 Mcneese...they are scoring easy...

72-65 with 11 seconds.

top 4 teams losing...nw st already lost.

57-40

LU missing easy shots, no defense, mcneese getting off rebound, ruf mcneese alum...combined, not good.

Good news, SFA down by 10 with 1 minute...

Not looking good.

I love that seeding, we wouldn't have to face SHSU or SFA until the championship game. I agree. The only teams that concern me is SHSU and SFA. SFA and SHSU might play each other in the second round.

Lamar played bad Wednesday. Roc should get on them for that. Lamar wins by 17

If the tourney started tonight... Lamar vs UTA SFA vs UTSA SHSU vs Mcneese NW st vs SELA