vp93

I was told the Beaumont coach agreed only to play only under protest.

[quote name="Mr. Buddy Garrity" post="1306425" timestamp="1350846506"] Central shouldnt be running the spread 80% of the time with the kind of O-Line they have. They aint built for the spread offense. Down-field blocking, not pass protection is their best out. [/quote] I totally agree, I can't remember a single time that they even tried to run up the middle.

Lum B 18 Vidor    0

In the power rankings you have Vidor as the #1(d2) and Ozen as the #2(d2) in 20-4A, you have Crosby as the #1 (d2) and Barbers Hill as the #2 (d2). So instead of the way you have the match ups, Vidor would play Barbers Hill and Ozen would play Crosby. 

[quote name="Baller 93" post="1275153" timestamp="1347985762"] [quote author=PirateGirl4ever link=topic=103187.msg1274959#msg1274959 date=1347972772] [quote author=Pirates98 link=topic=103187.msg1274920#msg1274920 date=1347953413] [quote author=Baller 93 link=topic=103187.msg1274919#msg1274919 date=1347949861] Im not saying Vidor is bad but i just dont see them moving the ball on a team that has a big, physical defensive line. Especially a team that has film and past game plans on defending the Wing-T. Yeah Vidor is 3-0 and it is a big deal for Vidor fans, but the total record of those 3 opponents is 1-9 with the only win coming by the hands of BC defeating a bad Kelly team. On the other hand Nederland comes in to the game with a 2-1 record, with their only loss coming to #3 ranked Angleton by 8 points. Nederlands opponents have a total record of 8-2 with the only two losses being dealt by the hands of Nederland. With all this being said Nederland is stilling trying to work the kinks out of there Offense and go more deeper into their playbook. But the Nederland defensive talent (if all Healthy) will be the best Vidor has seen all year, hands down. Heck, Nederland is the best team they will have played after this.  Nederland Wins 28-6!!!!!! [/quote] Last week it was all about Clear Brooks offense being biggest, fastest, and best Vidor has seen so far. Vidor wins and now all of a sudden Clear Brook is trash and everyone forgets about their OT loss to LP, where several posters claimed they outplayed LP but fell short on scoreboard. Then they take Seven Lakes to triple OT and Give them the win after they rush on the field after blocking a field goal kick. Just funny how they lose so much credibility after losing to Vidor . After one helluva hard fought WAR with lots of ups and downs :::::: Vidor 23 Nederland 21 [/quote] I remember seeing a lot of people saying last week that Clear Brook wasn't getting the credit they deserved because they were a tough team and don't let the 0-2 fool you.    Vidor beats them and now CB wasn't "that great" of a team.  Vidor - 17 Ned - 14 [/quote] Clear Brook lost to LaPorte in OT but LaPorte played a reall 5A team(Clear Springs) and got hammered 32-8 so dont think Clear Brook was that good of a team. Besides, I expected vidor to to play good against Clear Brook. No one in that district runs the Wing-T. It's hard to guard something that u never see!!! [/quote] Yeah, I guess you have apoint because Vidor faces the triple option every week.. 8) If you use that argument for one team you have to be willing to turn it around the other way too. So, since Vidor stopped the option that they don't see often, what would that mean?

[quote name="VP 93......" post="1274315" timestamp="1347902962"] performance to date: big school                   scored          allowed Lum-B          101                0 PNG-W          74                38 PNG-P          51                39 Vidor            45                31 BMT              45                93 NED              32                40 Lum-W          19                18 small school WOS              88                27 KTZ                52                77 BC                  39                49 OF                  39                66 LC                    0                113               this may change your mind in some of your picks!            [/quote] Vidor has allowed 25, 0(lum w), 12(ned) & 13(bmt). I know that doesn't change the point you were making.

[quote name="2 Sons Playing" post="1273039" timestamp="1347753346"] [quote author=wish u knew! Don't YA! link=topic=102944.msg1272856#msg1272856 date=1347744092] [quote author=jg69421080 link=topic=102944.msg1272217#msg1272217 date=1347692920] The North is going to have one heck of a Pro bowl team... [/quote] No Pro Bowl this year due to having two Super Bowls, big school,small school!! [/quote] Well that's just great...one more thing being taken away from the kids!!! Who's the genius that came up with that idea??? [/quote] My understanding is that there will be a pro bowl team, but they will play some other teams from an USA league..

Vidor 39 Bmt 13

12-0 Vidor @ half

Week 0 Games Baytown Sterling/[b]Baytown Lee[/b] Beaumont Central/[b]Port Arthur Memorial[/b] [b]Beaumont Ozen[/b]/Beaumont West Brook Crosby/[b]Nederland[/b] Little Cypress-Mauriceville/[b]West Orange-Stark[/b] [b]Port Neches-Groves[/b]/Silsbee [b]Vidor[/b]/Santa Fe Fort Bend Elkins/[b]Dayton[/b] Nuevo Leon/[b]Barbers Hill[/b] Livingston/[b]Woodlands College Park[/b] Hardin-Jefferson/[b]Anahuac[/b] Orangefield/[b]East Chambers[/b] [b]Bridge City[/b]/Newton [b]Hamshire-Fannett[/b]/Splendora [b]Jasper[/b]/Liberty [b]Shepherd[/b]/Kountze Hull-Daisetta/[b]Hardin[/b] Warren/[b]Evadale[/b] Sabine Pass/[b]Deweyville[/b] [b]Beaumont Kelly[/b]/West Sabine Burkeville/[b]West Hardin[/b] Buna/[b]Center[/b] New Waverly/[b]Woodville[/b] [b]San Augustine[/b]/Tyler Grace

They are on the left side of the page. I had reload the page on my laptop to get it to show this years schedule, it came right up on my phone.

They are posted on the STJFL website.

I thought that there was a mandatory 4 quarter suspension for throwing a punch. They have video of it and that would punish the ones that couldn't keep their emotions under control but not the ones that could.

[quote name="coog78" post="1132839" timestamp="1322413262"] [quote author=Roger Korby link=topic=92301.msg1132819#msg1132819 date=1322411485] Absolutely that both teams are at fault.  This says a lot as well about the control the coaches have over their players.  I can not say it enough:  if you are proactive as a coach, these actions and unruly behavior can be prevented.  The officials also should have been more proactive in calling unsportsmanlike penalties when players start using profanity on the field toward one another. By not doing so, they also did not establish control in the game. [/quote]AGREED [/quote] I agree, it sounded like the officials lost control of the game. It was headed that way and was never stopped by thee officials. The coaches also have the duty to see whom is doing what and taker them off the field and get control of them...

Vidor is the visiting team.

Me and my family are so proud of these young men. They are representing our community, their school, and their families so well. They are great ambassadors for Vidor on and off the field, fine young men.

[quote name="GCMPats" post="1126746" timestamp="1321916522"] What if, by chance, the other team has fans in attendance?  Should you ask them to be quiet when Ned has the ball too? That  would be so helpful. [/quote] I had thought this was understood, being quiet when your offense is at the line of scrimmage before the snap. Of course the other teams fans should be making noise when you have the ball but that doesn't mean that you should help them. One of the advantages the offense has is the snap count, which is irrelevant if your own fans are making noise so that you can't hear the qbs signals. I know this got Vidor in a 4 thand short causing us to get an illegal procedure penalty forcing us to punt.

[quote name="Hawkeye" post="1124085" timestamp="1321736030"] [quote author=vp93 link=topic=91861.msg1124075#msg1124075 date=1321735915] Wow, I sure wouldn't think to try and run outside against Ozen on 4th and 2..?? [/quote] I guess it was 4 down territory, but their kicker had already made a 40 yarder, that would have been about a 42 [/quote] I agree with going for it on 4th, just question the play call. I don't think I would count on getting the corner against Ozen.

Wow, I sure wouldn't think to try and run outside against Ozen on 4th and 2..??

[quote name="Wildcat979" post="1123843" timestamp="1321730649"] [color=purple]When i ask about offense line I'm talking speed and size wise because Angleton i think has one true lineman on the dline and other then that they rush speeds guys off the edge who have average lb size. [/color] [/quote] Sounds about what Montgomery did last night. The line is not big, I think in the paper the other day it said they avg 209.

Times are posted now. PNG W vs Vidor W @1 WOS vs Lum W      @5

Vidor jr white beat PNG purple 32-8.

[quote name="aries456" post="1091281" timestamp="1319325952"] As a Vidor fan... Why in the heck would we want to rest our starters? This is football, not gymnastics. You have a chance to finish out in 2nd place, and play an easier team in the first round. [/quote] We are pretty much set as the 2nd in d1, unless some how Ned lost their remaining 2 games (which I don't see happening). That said I wouldn't think they would change what we have been doing this far, unless it's giving Bolinger another week to recover.

Vidor W 31 Ned B    6

Yeah, that's the way it is shaping up. Vidor W and PNG P play 2 weeks in a row.