vp93

Most of the stadiums with turf are because more than one school uses the same field. To me that would be the only reason to have turf.

Baylor @ Colorado Oklahoma State @ Kansas State Texas vs. Oklahoma Missouri @ Texas Tech Texas A&M @ Kansas Nebraska @ Iowa State LSU @ Florida Michigan State @ Michigan Tennessee @ Georgia Oregon @ California

Deweyville 21 East Chambers 26

21-5A Kingwood at West Brook Atascocita at Port Arthur Memorial 21-4A Barbers Hill at Crosby Huffman at Galena Park 22-4A Central at Nederland Dayton at Ozen PN-G at LC-M Vidor at Lumberton 21-3A Kirbyville at West Orange-Stark Orangefield at Jasper Bridge City at Silsbee Hamshire-Fannett at Hardin-Jefferson 24-2A Deweyville at East Chambers **Game Of The Week** Anahuac at Kountze Warren at Hardin TAPPS 3-4 Cathedral at Cypress Community Christian Non-District Hull-Daisetta at Boling Evadale at Chester High Island at Colmesneil (Thur.) Kelly JV at West Hardin (Thur.) Kelly at Crawford (Sat.)

Yes... Vidor won a tight hard fought game against Nederland. That being said if they were to play again Nederland would still be favored, just not by as much. I am from Vidor and will back the Pirates till the very end, it is not a nock on Vidor at all. Nederland has been playing the kind of football that Vidor did on Friday night for years. Vidor will not have to worry about where they are on any poll, just play like they did Friday and the rest will take care of itself. Not only that we are from Vidor and like being the underdog. Let's not talk about jumping to the top just yet.

This doesn't surprise me. Roger has been mentioned before with steriods. Unfortunately there is no way to prove one way or another. Neither one has ever failed a drug test. This is not over with in the next couple of years most of the better players will be rummored to have used steriods.

Come on Stros... the cards are down 5-0 in the 4th

I don't care how small and how few players there are, there has to be another running back. It doesn't show very good sportsmanship. He had 29 carries and all 10 of thier TDs? I think the coach should have done things different.

This is a tough district and there still is a long way to go. So, I am not going to say Vidor will make the playoffs. I think that Vidor is better than they were thought to be. There isn't anyone in this district that can't beat anyone on any given night.

Vidor was down by 10 with like 3 min to go. I was really surprised how well they ran the 2 min offense. Vidor got a couple of first downs and then got a man behind the secondary for about a 30-40 yard TD. Then Vidor got a perfectly executed onside kick, with less than a min left. Vidor picked up a couple first downs again and then got the same man behind the secondary in the corner of the endzone. Ned got returned the kick off to about the 50 with about 20 sec left. Then they had a long pass to about the 3 or 4, call a to with 4 sec left. Then Vidor stopped Mosley at the 1 to end the game.

Nederland had Ithink 2 fumbles and Vidor had 1. It was a very well played, hard hitting game.

This was a great game, one of the best I have been too and not just because Vidor won. There is no quit in either one of these teams, just the way it is supposed to be.

Check the forum rules:

Just a 1/2 game back now. You know every other team that will be in the play offs deffinately do not wan Houston in there. I would think if they get in, right now they would be favored as the NL champs again with the pitching situation with the Mets.

Very good post purplepride.

It starts at 9.

The way I read this topic...it was about allowing someone that was on Varsity who failed, to play the Thursday before grades come out, with the JV. I don't have a problem with them being allowed to practice with the JV or run scout team etc, as long as he is making an honest attempt in his classes. Personally, my child it would not be an option. They would be at home studying.

I read it. I just would not even think about it. If it meant that much to him then he would have made the grades to play. To me it comes down to running a quality program and teaching these young men more than just football. There are consequences to every action or lack there of.

If this is true, then this explains part of the problems Lumberton has had in the past with the Varsity.

Why would you paly him? He let the coach and his team mates down by not keeping his grades up, like everyone else. Not only that, but isn't JV to groom athletes into being varstiy players. There would be no reason to play someone on Thursday on JV if there would not be the chance of them playing varsity that year.

Yeah, it's not right. It is punishing the the athlete's for living where they are.

Oaks Christian(Calif) vs Venice(Calif)