WeedBegone

[quote name="bullets13" post="1392302" timestamp="1365377300"] salt water it's flounder, mahi mahi, amberjack, grouper, snapper, and tripletail.  speckled trout is good, but not as good as the other ones mentioned. [/quote] Add ling and you have corned the fish market on these options.  Tripletail is the best. 

[quote name="Richard Cranium" post="1379549" timestamp="1361890001"] Lumberton's visitors restrooms are gross!!! Always standing water. [/quote] [move][b][color=blue][size=14pt]Dude Thats not water!![/size][/color][/b][/move]

Pleasure Island on the bulkhead by the RV park.  Tide coming in was hindered by the North wind that was behind schedule getting out of here.  Flounders were 13 14 and 15.  I was thinking about the patttern and how long it would take to get to 20. :)

I did catch a couple of keeper flounder and released one.  Also reeled in about a 7 inch whiting trying to mate with a 4 inch plastic. Gonna try the coast tomorrow.

Sounds lke i need to try both the surf and the island.  Thanks for the info,  I will try and keep you posted.  There should be nuff fish out there for both of us.  8)

Any body got ideas for saltwater spots next week.  I am ready to go try some spots.  Water temp still a little cool.  Any reports from the Sabine Lake bulkheads by the marina?  Any from Sabine Pass State Park?  I am also even interestead trying for whiting on the coast if it is not too early.  I need a nibble, I need a bite I need something to do with my rod in my left and my real in my right.

[quote name="PN-G bamakid" post="1368390" timestamp="1359606681"] I can hear it now. "I can see Russia from my trailer." ;D [/quote] He  is takng his house to Alaska?  There goes the old neighborhood at the hill.

This thread should be " word to the stupid."  I'd like to think that the wise already get it.  But then again,you cant fix.........

[quote name="HIGHpoint96" post="1329130" timestamp="1352826387"] Well i tried to look it up and it said stump was the coach in 2004, if thats wrong then my bad. I just hate when people try to sit backand act like they know football because they have ESPN and make comments as if coaches will start trying harder because you called them out on this board. Stump was a phenominal coach, and the Bruins were 5-5 last year and lost a kid that went to UT and some other small D2/D3 and JUCO college players. This year they went 4-6, you say that is not what you are used to in a 1st year, but you just went 5-5 in Coach stumps 7th year and he did an amazing job. He probably left for a reason. It's an extremely tough district and in a years time the bruins will most likely be better than they are now. [/quote] I agree with this post.  Now we can be Buddies  ;D 8)

[quote name="HIGHpoint96" post="1329103" timestamp="1352824290"] so you are saying that max preps put his name as the head coach a whole year before he started working there? It says it clear as day go look for your self. It was over 8 years ago buddy, you could just have your years mixed up, people do it all the time. Why would a credited recruiting website report that wrong? you are going off your personal memory, they are a professional football record keeping database. I'll take their word for it over your personal memory. [/quote] Geeze, I am simply saying that you are wrong, dead wrong, totally wrong, absolutely 100% wrong.  I know coach Stump, I know West Brook, and I know that I am right.  This is a fact. I am also saying that we need to give Flannigan and his staff another season before judging which is an opinion.

[quote name="HIGHpoint96" post="1329097" timestamp="1352823652"] You are going off memory i just looked it up on max preps. Go look it up for your self buddy, its the truth I did do my research. [/quote] TRUST me --you and your resource is wrong.  I was there for the agony of defeat to the thrill of victory. Perhaps a wager is needed here.  8)

[quote name="WeedBegone" post="1329094" timestamp="1352823336"] [quote author=HIGHpoint96 link=topic=106076.msg1329049#msg1329049 date=1352819819] Craig Stumps first year was in 2004, in which he went 2-8. Stump took a year to get it rolling and when he did they rolled. So i'm sure if we check the rest we will see you are wrong about those 82. It totally discredits your validity when you just make stuff up to prove a point. Now nothing you say can be taken serious because you are just lying and trying to make your self look good while talking about some one elses lively hood. Stay classy 82' HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!! [/quote] Might I add that it is unfair to judge coach Flannigan this early.  Stump inherited a loosing program that had some hungry seniors searching for some wins.  They did have some good leaders that rose to the occasion under the new staffs guidance.  Flannigan inherited the opposite, as he returned a much younger team lacking the leadership and perhaps expecting the winning to come easily as earlier seasons indicated.  We should expect more from this staff next year however. I am sorry to say that this is incorrect.  Stumps first year was the Hurricane Rita year where they did win 8 games.  My son was on that team.  In fact that was the furthest he took WB during his tenure.  It was against all odds as Da Brook had to not only get there players back to a messy situation but he also had to fight UIL to make sure that the  district did not eliminate them from a chance to continue to play.  Additionally, Stump built a better disciplined program as he began the season weeding out a few players that challenged his authority.  One of these was a returning area star all district line-backer that did not seem to want to adhere to his policies.  It took nads to do what he did.  He had an awesome staff and IMO this group over-achieved to get that far. [/quote]

[quote name="HIGHpoint96" post="1329049" timestamp="1352819819"] Craig Stumps first year was in 2004, in which he went 2-8. Stump took a year to get it rolling and when he did they rolled. So i'm sure if we check the rest we will see you are wrong about those 82. It totally discredits your validity when you just make stuff up to prove a point. Now nothing you say can be taken serious because you are just lying and trying to make your self look good while talking about some one elses lively hood. Stay classy 82' HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!! [/quote] I am sorry to say that this is incorrect.  Stumps first year was the Hurricane Rita year where they did win 8 games.  My son was on that team.  In fact that was the furthest he took WB during his tenure.  It was against all odds as Da Brook had to not only get there players back to a messy situation but he also had to fight UIL to make sure that the  district did not eliminate them from a chance to continue to play.  Additionally, Stump built a better disciplined program as he began the season weeding out a few players that challenged his authority.  One of these was a returning area star all district line-backer that did not seem to want to adhere to his policies.  It took nads to do what he did.  He had an awesome staff and IMO this group over-achieved to get that far.

Think it is time to shut this thread down.  Enough has been said.  The fan has spoken.  :-[

Sure is lonely on this victory thread.  :-[