DCTF Class 4A Pre-season top 25

[DemDAWGS!]

[quote name="Mr. Buddy Garrity" post="1414685" timestamp="1371675635"]
[quote author=bigdog link=topic=112605.msg1414682#msg1414682 date=1371675442]
[quote author=DemDAWGS! link=topic=112605.msg1414678#msg1414678 date=1371675213]
[quote author=Mr. Buddy Garrity link=topic=112605.msg1414667#msg1414667 date=1371674357]
[quote author=dustoff03 link=topic=112605.msg1414665#msg1414665 date=1371673968]
[quote author=cougar14 link=topic=112605.msg1414644#msg1414644 date=1371671934]
[quote author=aschom78 link=topic=112605.msg1414556#msg1414556 date=1371658533]
[quote author=cougar14 link=topic=112605.msg1414520#msg1414520 date=1371653818]
[quote author=flyonwall12 link=topic=112605.msg1414506#msg1414506 date=1371650090]
[quote author=Mr. Buddy Garrity link=topic=112605.msg1414452#msg1414452 date=1371613799]
[quote author=aschom78 link=topic=112605.msg1414450#msg1414450 date=1371613177]
Marshall, Elgin, and Lovejoy are a bit low, [b]Aledo a bit too high[/b] IMO
[/quote]Yes!
[/quote]

Don't think Aledo is too high. Lost last year to Guyer and bring back a junior RB that is almost as good as Gray. If they go Division 2 they'll be the favorites. Division 1, same as last year. 2nd round for the title.
[/quote]I actually think Cedar Park is the favorite in D2 rather Aledo goes or not. 16 returning starters from a state title team. IMO Cedar Park would have beaten Guyer. WF Ryder is high, Marshall and Dawson are low on the poll. I think Dawson is top 5 when the AP poll comes out though.
[/quote]
I don't think Cedar Park would have beaten Guyer last year, I think they would this upcoming season if they played. I think Aledo is top 10, just not #3. Dawson is just a wee bit overrated, they have they players to win it all its just that they played too sloppy last season and a few of the players would throw tantrums when something didn't go their way. If they can tighten things up next season then I don't think anyone in 4a will be able to stop them.
[/quote]IDK, Guyer was blown out twice last year while Cedar Park's two 5a losses were to semi-finalist austint westlake and and 3 point loss to abeliene cooper who has one of the most dynamic players in the state in lorenzo joe. i think cedar park is the katy of 4a, they can win d1 or d2 title. no way to ever know but i think cedar park would have gotten them. [b]dawson has the most starters in the district coming back from playoff teams to i think they the favorites to represent region 3 in d1.[/b]
[/quote]
shhhhh! your gonna upset demdawgs. ;D
[/quote]What you talking bout dustoff? SC is the favorites in Region 3 D1, the favorites to get knocked out 1st round again.

Them "local world beaters in their own mind from SC" will not get out the 1st round of the playoffs for the foreseeable future (including this yr along with the 2 yrs after re-alignment) ;)
[/quote]

Those 1st and 2nd rounds are just as much about the luck of the draw as skill.  Had Ned or any other team in GT's path got GT 1st ...they're one and done.  Had Vidor lined up with a team like Tomball, Livingston, or a few others, they're onto the 2nd round.  Had Vidor got Ned in the 2nd round, its a toss up.  Vidor played those guys close and anything could happen in a rematch.  Ned could have been gone in round one or two ...but they drew favorable opponents.  SC could have been on to round three had they lined up against Angleton or Ned in the 2nd round.

I'm still not sold on the realignment.  It will amaze me to see SC get anywhere near 3,000 kids any time soon.  Just don't see it.  Humble/Atascocita WAS booming, but this has slowed down.  Another big community needs to pop up or some AHS kids will need to get zoned to AHS AND they'll have to actually attend SC.
[/quote]

[b]So beating the 4A #1 team in state was a weak schedule??[/b]  BTW, Angelton would have sent you home as well.
[/quote]According to him beating Dawson should be easy  ::)
[/quote]

Pearland was impressive ...but you're missing the bigger point.  Its about who you get paired with for most teams.   

[ram0524]

Getting paired with the #1 team in state isn't really fortunate.

[DemDAWGS!]

[quote name="dustoff03" post="1414684" timestamp="1371675600"]
[quote author=DemDAWGS! link=topic=112605.msg1414680#msg1414680 date=1371675366]
[quote author=ram0524 link=topic=112605.msg1414671#msg1414671 date=1371674661]
[quote author=DemDAWGS! link=topic=112605.msg1414669#msg1414669 date=1371674535]
[quote author=dustoff03 link=topic=112605.msg1414665#msg1414665 date=1371673968]
[quote author=cougar14 link=topic=112605.msg1414644#msg1414644 date=1371671934]
[quote author=aschom78 link=topic=112605.msg1414556#msg1414556 date=1371658533]
[quote author=cougar14 link=topic=112605.msg1414520#msg1414520 date=1371653818]
[quote author=flyonwall12 link=topic=112605.msg1414506#msg1414506 date=1371650090]
[quote author=Mr. Buddy Garrity link=topic=112605.msg1414452#msg1414452 date=1371613799]
[quote author=aschom78 link=topic=112605.msg1414450#msg1414450 date=1371613177]
Marshall, Elgin, and Lovejoy are a bit low, [b]Aledo a bit too high[/b] IMO
[/quote]Yes!
[/quote]

Don't think Aledo is too high. Lost last year to Guyer and bring back a junior RB that is almost as good as Gray. If they go Division 2 they'll be the favorites. Division 1, same as last year. 2nd round for the title.
[/quote]I actually think Cedar Park is the favorite in D2 rather Aledo goes or not. 16 returning starters from a state title team. IMO Cedar Park would have beaten Guyer. WF Ryder is high, Marshall and Dawson are low on the poll. I think Dawson is top 5 when the AP poll comes out though.
[/quote]
I don't think Cedar Park would have beaten Guyer last year, I think they would this upcoming season if they played. I think Aledo is top 10, just not #3. Dawson is just a wee bit overrated, they have they players to win it all its just that they played too sloppy last season and a few of the players would throw tantrums when something didn't go their way. If they can tighten things up next season then I don't think anyone in 4a will be able to stop them.
[/quote]IDK, Guyer was blown out twice last year while Cedar Park's two 5a losses were to semi-finalist austint westlake and and 3 point loss to abeliene cooper who has one of the most dynamic players in the state in lorenzo joe. i think cedar park is the katy of 4a, they can win d1 or d2 title. no way to ever know but i think cedar park would have gotten them. [b]dawson has the most starters in the district coming back from playoff teams to i think they the favorites to represent region 3 in d1.[/b]
[/quote]
shhhhh! your gonna upset demdawgs. ;D
[/quote]

Vidor just needs to worry about beating Nederland.  Sounding highly unlikely ...but am pulling for you guys.  Vidor definitely gets the heart award.  Any team with kids the size of most middle schools that can still compete gets a big pat on the back.

I'm gonna trash talk as much as I can this year ...but SC needs to prove they can beat teams like Aledo, Cedar Creek, Guyer, etc.
[/quote]

Georgetown, Magnolia West..
[/quote]

This year's GT is no prob ...I'm curious to see if they go the same route as Humble.  [b]MW ate up a weak inexperienced SC defense on the ground. [/b]
[/quote]
dude, we ate up your defense on the ground. had we not turned it over 6 times, who knows.
[/quote]

Yep ...moved the ball well ...but that's also about playing hide and seek with the football too.  It's not like you had 3 guys that you could put in the I-formation and dominate.  You owned the ground and SC owned the air.  Our passing attack was too much, plain and simple.  Also, you have to cancel some of those turnovers because you got a couple extra drives due to successful onside kicks (was impressed with the aggressive play calling btw).

[dustoff03]

[quote name="DemDAWGS!" post="1414691" timestamp="1371676073"]
[quote author=dustoff03 link=topic=112605.msg1414684#msg1414684 date=1371675600]
[quote author=DemDAWGS! link=topic=112605.msg1414680#msg1414680 date=1371675366]
[quote author=ram0524 link=topic=112605.msg1414671#msg1414671 date=1371674661]
[quote author=DemDAWGS! link=topic=112605.msg1414669#msg1414669 date=1371674535]
[quote author=dustoff03 link=topic=112605.msg1414665#msg1414665 date=1371673968]
[quote author=cougar14 link=topic=112605.msg1414644#msg1414644 date=1371671934]
[quote author=aschom78 link=topic=112605.msg1414556#msg1414556 date=1371658533]
[quote author=cougar14 link=topic=112605.msg1414520#msg1414520 date=1371653818]
[quote author=flyonwall12 link=topic=112605.msg1414506#msg1414506 date=1371650090]
[quote author=Mr. Buddy Garrity link=topic=112605.msg1414452#msg1414452 date=1371613799]
[quote author=aschom78 link=topic=112605.msg1414450#msg1414450 date=1371613177]
Marshall, Elgin, and Lovejoy are a bit low, [b]Aledo a bit too high[/b] IMO
[/quote]Yes!
[/quote]

Don't think Aledo is too high. Lost last year to Guyer and bring back a junior RB that is almost as good as Gray. If they go Division 2 they'll be the favorites. Division 1, same as last year. 2nd round for the title.
[/quote]I actually think Cedar Park is the favorite in D2 rather Aledo goes or not. 16 returning starters from a state title team. IMO Cedar Park would have beaten Guyer. WF Ryder is high, Marshall and Dawson are low on the poll. I think Dawson is top 5 when the AP poll comes out though.
[/quote]
I don't think Cedar Park would have beaten Guyer last year, I think they would this upcoming season if they played. I think Aledo is top 10, just not #3. Dawson is just a wee bit overrated, they have they players to win it all its just that they played too sloppy last season and a few of the players would throw tantrums when something didn't go their way. If they can tighten things up next season then I don't think anyone in 4a will be able to stop them.
[/quote]IDK, Guyer was blown out twice last year while Cedar Park's two 5a losses were to semi-finalist austint westlake and and 3 point loss to abeliene cooper who has one of the most dynamic players in the state in lorenzo joe. i think cedar park is the katy of 4a, they can win d1 or d2 title. no way to ever know but i think cedar park would have gotten them. [b]dawson has the most starters in the district coming back from playoff teams to i think they the favorites to represent region 3 in d1.[/b]
[/quote]
shhhhh! your gonna upset demdawgs. ;D
[/quote]

Vidor just needs to worry about beating Nederland.  Sounding highly unlikely ...but am pulling for you guys.  Vidor definitely gets the heart award.  Any team with kids the size of most middle schools that can still compete gets a big pat on the back.

I'm gonna trash talk as much as I can this year ...but SC needs to prove they can beat teams like Aledo, Cedar Creek, Guyer, etc.
[/quote]

Georgetown, Magnolia West..
[/quote]

This year's GT is no prob ...I'm curious to see if they go the same route as Humble.  [b]MW ate up a weak inexperienced SC defense on the ground. [/b]
[/quote]
dude, we ate up your defense on the ground. had we not turned it over 6 times, who knows.
[/quote]

Yep ...moved the ball well ...but that's also about playing hide and seek with the football too.  It's not like you had 3 guys that you could put in the I-formation and dominate.  You owned the ground and SC owned the air.  Our passing attack was too much, plain and simple.  Also, you have to cancel some of those turnovers because you got a couple extra drives due to successful onside kicks (was impressed with the aggressive play calling btw).
[/quote]
i'm just making the point that your defense wasn't good enough to win a title. you blame the d for MW and I'm saying it didn't help you this past season either. you blame enrollment #'s, but in reality, it was the defense. I think you know this. and yes, we had no answer for your passing game. in fact we knew it was going to be the difference before hand. we needed to play mistake free and keep Sharp on the sideline but it didn't work out that way.

[DemDAWGS!]

[quote name="dustoff03" post="1414693" timestamp="1371676458"]
[quote author=DemDAWGS! link=topic=112605.msg1414691#msg1414691 date=1371676073]
[quote author=dustoff03 link=topic=112605.msg1414684#msg1414684 date=1371675600]
[quote author=DemDAWGS! link=topic=112605.msg1414680#msg1414680 date=1371675366]
[quote author=ram0524 link=topic=112605.msg1414671#msg1414671 date=1371674661]
[quote author=DemDAWGS! link=topic=112605.msg1414669#msg1414669 date=1371674535]
[quote author=dustoff03 link=topic=112605.msg1414665#msg1414665 date=1371673968]
[quote author=cougar14 link=topic=112605.msg1414644#msg1414644 date=1371671934]
[quote author=aschom78 link=topic=112605.msg1414556#msg1414556 date=1371658533]
[quote author=cougar14 link=topic=112605.msg1414520#msg1414520 date=1371653818]
[quote author=flyonwall12 link=topic=112605.msg1414506#msg1414506 date=1371650090]
[quote author=Mr. Buddy Garrity link=topic=112605.msg1414452#msg1414452 date=1371613799]
[quote author=aschom78 link=topic=112605.msg1414450#msg1414450 date=1371613177]
Marshall, Elgin, and Lovejoy are a bit low, [b]Aledo a bit too high[/b] IMO
[/quote]Yes!
[/quote]

Don't think Aledo is too high. Lost last year to Guyer and bring back a junior RB that is almost as good as Gray. If they go Division 2 they'll be the favorites. Division 1, same as last year. 2nd round for the title.
[/quote]I actually think Cedar Park is the favorite in D2 rather Aledo goes or not. 16 returning starters from a state title team. IMO Cedar Park would have beaten Guyer. WF Ryder is high, Marshall and Dawson are low on the poll. I think Dawson is top 5 when the AP poll comes out though.
[/quote]
I don't think Cedar Park would have beaten Guyer last year, I think they would this upcoming season if they played. I think Aledo is top 10, just not #3. Dawson is just a wee bit overrated, they have they players to win it all its just that they played too sloppy last season and a few of the players would throw tantrums when something didn't go their way. If they can tighten things up next season then I don't think anyone in 4a will be able to stop them.
[/quote]IDK, Guyer was blown out twice last year while Cedar Park's two 5a losses were to semi-finalist austint westlake and and 3 point loss to abeliene cooper who has one of the most dynamic players in the state in lorenzo joe. i think cedar park is the katy of 4a, they can win d1 or d2 title. no way to ever know but i think cedar park would have gotten them. [b]dawson has the most starters in the district coming back from playoff teams to i think they the favorites to represent region 3 in d1.[/b]
[/quote]
shhhhh! your gonna upset demdawgs. ;D
[/quote]

Vidor just needs to worry about beating Nederland.  Sounding highly unlikely ...but am pulling for you guys.  Vidor definitely gets the heart award.  Any team with kids the size of most middle schools that can still compete gets a big pat on the back.

I'm gonna trash talk as much as I can this year ...but SC needs to prove they can beat teams like Aledo, Cedar Creek, Guyer, etc.
[/quote]

Georgetown, Magnolia West..
[/quote]

This year's GT is no prob ...I'm curious to see if they go the same route as Humble.  [b]MW ate up a weak inexperienced SC defense on the ground. [/b]
[/quote]
dude, we ate up your defense on the ground. had we not turned it over 6 times, who knows.
[/quote]

Yep ...moved the ball well ...but that's also about playing hide and seek with the football too.  It's not like you had 3 guys that you could put in the I-formation and dominate.  You owned the ground and SC owned the air.  Our passing attack was too much, plain and simple.  Also, you have to cancel some of those turnovers because you got a couple extra drives due to successful onside kicks (was impressed with the aggressive play calling btw).
[/quote]
i'm just making the point that your defense wasn't good enough to win a title. you blame the d for MW and I'm saying it didn't help you this past season either. you blame enrollment #'s, but in reality, it was the defense. I think you know this. and yes, we had no answer for your passing game. in fact we knew it was going to be the difference before hand. we needed to play mistake free and keep Sharp on the sideline but it didn't work out that way.
[/quote]

You're right about the defense.  They played a bend-but-don't-break style.  I don't recall seeing too many sacks during the year.  I also don't recall a game where our defense would get the game ball ...but they did make some key plays from time to time.  Crosby game stands out well.  We had a key stop on 4th and short on our side of the field.  Also had an INT in the endzone which was a back breaker. 

SC defense is going to be a HUGE indicator this year.  We have about 3 proven stand out players and a couple more that "should" be stand outs.  Really not seeing any big D lineman and that worries me.

[snafu]

[quote name="DemDAWGS!" post="1414704" timestamp="1371676793"]
[quote author=dustoff03 link=topic=112605.msg1414693#msg1414693 date=1371676458]
[quote author=DemDAWGS! link=topic=112605.msg1414691#msg1414691 date=1371676073]
[quote author=dustoff03 link=topic=112605.msg1414684#msg1414684 date=1371675600]
[quote author=DemDAWGS! link=topic=112605.msg1414680#msg1414680 date=1371675366]
[quote author=ram0524 link=topic=112605.msg1414671#msg1414671 date=1371674661]
[quote author=DemDAWGS! link=topic=112605.msg1414669#msg1414669 date=1371674535]
[quote author=dustoff03 link=topic=112605.msg1414665#msg1414665 date=1371673968]
[quote author=cougar14 link=topic=112605.msg1414644#msg1414644 date=1371671934]
[quote author=aschom78 link=topic=112605.msg1414556#msg1414556 date=1371658533]
[quote author=cougar14 link=topic=112605.msg1414520#msg1414520 date=1371653818]
[quote author=flyonwall12 link=topic=112605.msg1414506#msg1414506 date=1371650090]
[quote author=Mr. Buddy Garrity link=topic=112605.msg1414452#msg1414452 date=1371613799]
[quote author=aschom78 link=topic=112605.msg1414450#msg1414450 date=1371613177]
Marshall, Elgin, and Lovejoy are a bit low, [b]Aledo a bit too high[/b] IMO
[/quote]Yes!
[/quote]

Don't think Aledo is too high. Lost last year to Guyer and bring back a junior RB that is almost as good as Gray. If they go Division 2 they'll be the favorites. Division 1, same as last year. 2nd round for the title.
[/quote]I actually think Cedar Park is the favorite in D2 rather Aledo goes or not. 16 returning starters from a state title team. IMO Cedar Park would have beaten Guyer. WF Ryder is high, Marshall and Dawson are low on the poll. I think Dawson is top 5 when the AP poll comes out though.
[/quote]
I don't think Cedar Park would have beaten Guyer last year, I think they would this upcoming season if they played. I think Aledo is top 10, just not #3. Dawson is just a wee bit overrated, they have they players to win it all its just that they played too sloppy last season and a few of the players would throw tantrums when something didn't go their way. If they can tighten things up next season then I don't think anyone in 4a will be able to stop them.
[/quote]IDK, Guyer was blown out twice last year while Cedar Park's two 5a losses were to semi-finalist austint westlake and and 3 point loss to abeliene cooper who has one of the most dynamic players in the state in lorenzo joe. i think cedar park is the katy of 4a, they can win d1 or d2 title. no way to ever know but i think cedar park would have gotten them. [b]dawson has the most starters in the district coming back from playoff teams to i think they the favorites to represent region 3 in d1.[/b]
[/quote]
shhhhh! your gonna upset demdawgs. ;D
[/quote]

Vidor just needs to worry about beating Nederland.  Sounding highly unlikely ...but am pulling for you guys.  Vidor definitely gets the heart award.  Any team with kids the size of most middle schools that can still compete gets a big pat on the back.

I'm gonna trash talk as much as I can this year ...but SC needs to prove they can beat teams like Aledo, Cedar Creek, Guyer, etc.
[/quote]

Georgetown, Magnolia West..
[/quote]

This year's GT is no prob ...I'm curious to see if they go the same route as Humble.  [b]MW ate up a weak inexperienced SC defense on the ground. [/b]
[/quote]
dude, we ate up your defense on the ground. had we not turned it over 6 times, who knows.
[/quote]

Yep ...moved the ball well ...but that's also about playing hide and seek with the football too.  It's not like you had 3 guys that you could put in the I-formation and dominate.  You owned the ground and SC owned the air.  Our passing attack was too much, plain and simple.  Also, you have to cancel some of those turnovers because you got a couple extra drives due to successful onside kicks (was impressed with the aggressive play calling btw).
[/quote]
i'm just making the point that your defense wasn't good enough to win a title. you blame the d for MW and I'm saying it didn't help you this past season either. you blame enrollment #'s, but in reality, it was the defense. I think you know this. and yes, we had no answer for your passing game. in fact we knew it was going to be the difference before hand. we needed to play mistake free and keep Sharp on the sideline but it didn't work out that way.
[/quote]

You're right about the defense.  They played a bend-but-don't-break style.  I don't recall seeing too many sacks during the year.  I also don't recall a game where our defense would get the game ball ...but they did make some key plays from time to time.  Crosby game stands out well.  We had a key stop on 4th and short on our side of the field.  Also had an INT in the endzone which was a back breaker. 

SC defense is going to be a HUGE indicator this year.  We have about 3 proven stand out players and a couple more that "should" be stand outs.  Really not seeing any big D lineman and that worries me.
[/quote]

I would think you move some of them D1 studs off the O side of the ball and put them at DBs or Safety... maybe 1 of the 5 or 6 at RB and move them to LBs... its about team play... and a decent WR makes for a hell of a DB most of the time... a 2nd or 3rd string RB makes a great LB...

[aschom78]

[quote name="DemDAWGS!" post="1414704" timestamp="1371676793"]
[quote author=dustoff03 link=topic=112605.msg1414693#msg1414693 date=1371676458]
[quote author=DemDAWGS! link=topic=112605.msg1414691#msg1414691 date=1371676073]
[quote author=dustoff03 link=topic=112605.msg1414684#msg1414684 date=1371675600]
[quote author=DemDAWGS! link=topic=112605.msg1414680#msg1414680 date=1371675366]
[quote author=ram0524 link=topic=112605.msg1414671#msg1414671 date=1371674661]
[quote author=DemDAWGS! link=topic=112605.msg1414669#msg1414669 date=1371674535]
[quote author=dustoff03 link=topic=112605.msg1414665#msg1414665 date=1371673968]
[quote author=cougar14 link=topic=112605.msg1414644#msg1414644 date=1371671934]
[quote author=aschom78 link=topic=112605.msg1414556#msg1414556 date=1371658533]
[quote author=cougar14 link=topic=112605.msg1414520#msg1414520 date=1371653818]
[quote author=flyonwall12 link=topic=112605.msg1414506#msg1414506 date=1371650090]
[quote author=Mr. Buddy Garrity link=topic=112605.msg1414452#msg1414452 date=1371613799]
[quote author=aschom78 link=topic=112605.msg1414450#msg1414450 date=1371613177]
Marshall, Elgin, and Lovejoy are a bit low, [b]Aledo a bit too high[/b] IMO
[/quote]Yes!
[/quote]

Don't think Aledo is too high. Lost last year to Guyer and bring back a junior RB that is almost as good as Gray. If they go Division 2 they'll be the favorites. Division 1, same as last year. 2nd round for the title.
[/quote]I actually think Cedar Park is the favorite in D2 rather Aledo goes or not. 16 returning starters from a state title team. IMO Cedar Park would have beaten Guyer. WF Ryder is high, Marshall and Dawson are low on the poll. I think Dawson is top 5 when the AP poll comes out though.
[/quote]
I don't think Cedar Park would have beaten Guyer last year, I think they would this upcoming season if they played. I think Aledo is top 10, just not #3. Dawson is just a wee bit overrated, they have they players to win it all its just that they played too sloppy last season and a few of the players would throw tantrums when something didn't go their way. If they can tighten things up next season then I don't think anyone in 4a will be able to stop them.
[/quote]IDK, Guyer was blown out twice last year while Cedar Park's two 5a losses were to semi-finalist austint westlake and and 3 point loss to abeliene cooper who has one of the most dynamic players in the state in lorenzo joe. i think cedar park is the katy of 4a, they can win d1 or d2 title. no way to ever know but i think cedar park would have gotten them. [b]dawson has the most starters in the district coming back from playoff teams to i think they the favorites to represent region 3 in d1.[/b]
[/quote]
shhhhh! your gonna upset demdawgs. ;D
[/quote]

Vidor just needs to worry about beating Nederland.  Sounding highly unlikely ...but am pulling for you guys.  Vidor definitely gets the heart award.  Any team with kids the size of most middle schools that can still compete gets a big pat on the back.

I'm gonna trash talk as much as I can this year ...but SC needs to prove they can beat teams like Aledo, Cedar Creek, Guyer, etc.
[/quote]

Georgetown, Magnolia West..
[/quote]

This year's GT is no prob ...I'm curious to see if they go the same route as Humble.  [b]MW ate up a weak inexperienced SC defense on the ground. [/b]
[/quote]
dude, we ate up your defense on the ground. had we not turned it over 6 times, who knows.
[/quote]

Yep ...moved the ball well ...but that's also about playing hide and seek with the football too.  It's not like you had 3 guys that you could put in the I-formation and dominate.  You owned the ground and SC owned the air.  Our passing attack was too much, plain and simple.  Also, you have to cancel some of those turnovers because you got a couple extra drives due to successful onside kicks (was impressed with the aggressive play calling btw).
[/quote]
i'm just making the point that your defense wasn't good enough to win a title. you blame the d for MW and I'm saying it didn't help you this past season either. you blame enrollment #'s, but in reality, it was the defense. I think you know this. and yes, we had no answer for your passing game. in fact we knew it was going to be the difference before hand. we needed to play mistake free and keep Sharp on the sideline but it didn't work out that way.
[/quote]

You're right about the defense.  They played a bend-but-don't-break style.  I don't recall seeing too many sacks during the year.  I also don't recall a game where our defense would get the game ball ...but they did make some key plays from time to time.  Crosby game stands out well.  We had a key stop on 4th and short on our side of the field.  Also had an INT in the endzone which was a back breaker. 

SC defense is going to be a HUGE indicator this year.  We have about 3 proven stand out players and a couple more that "should" be stand outs. [B] Really not seeing any big D lineman and that worries me.[\B]
[/quote]
Hanora is a good sized guy, just needs to get quicker before week 0.

[DemDAWGS!]

[quote name="Coach Comeaux" post="1414709" timestamp="1371677344"]
[quote author=DemDAWGS! link=topic=112605.msg1414704#msg1414704 date=1371676793]
[quote author=dustoff03 link=topic=112605.msg1414693#msg1414693 date=1371676458]
[quote author=DemDAWGS! link=topic=112605.msg1414691#msg1414691 date=1371676073]
[quote author=dustoff03 link=topic=112605.msg1414684#msg1414684 date=1371675600]
[quote author=DemDAWGS! link=topic=112605.msg1414680#msg1414680 date=1371675366]
[quote author=ram0524 link=topic=112605.msg1414671#msg1414671 date=1371674661]
[quote author=DemDAWGS! link=topic=112605.msg1414669#msg1414669 date=1371674535]
[quote author=dustoff03 link=topic=112605.msg1414665#msg1414665 date=1371673968]
[quote author=cougar14 link=topic=112605.msg1414644#msg1414644 date=1371671934]
[quote author=aschom78 link=topic=112605.msg1414556#msg1414556 date=1371658533]
[quote author=cougar14 link=topic=112605.msg1414520#msg1414520 date=1371653818]
[quote author=flyonwall12 link=topic=112605.msg1414506#msg1414506 date=1371650090]
[quote author=Mr. Buddy Garrity link=topic=112605.msg1414452#msg1414452 date=1371613799]
[quote author=aschom78 link=topic=112605.msg1414450#msg1414450 date=1371613177]
Marshall, Elgin, and Lovejoy are a bit low, [b]Aledo a bit too high[/b] IMO
[/quote]Yes!
[/quote]

Don't think Aledo is too high. Lost last year to Guyer and bring back a junior RB that is almost as good as Gray. If they go Division 2 they'll be the favorites. Division 1, same as last year. 2nd round for the title.
[/quote]I actually think Cedar Park is the favorite in D2 rather Aledo goes or not. 16 returning starters from a state title team. IMO Cedar Park would have beaten Guyer. WF Ryder is high, Marshall and Dawson are low on the poll. I think Dawson is top 5 when the AP poll comes out though.
[/quote]
I don't think Cedar Park would have beaten Guyer last year, I think they would this upcoming season if they played. I think Aledo is top 10, just not #3. Dawson is just a wee bit overrated, they have they players to win it all its just that they played too sloppy last season and a few of the players would throw tantrums when something didn't go their way. If they can tighten things up next season then I don't think anyone in 4a will be able to stop them.
[/quote]IDK, Guyer was blown out twice last year while Cedar Park's two 5a losses were to semi-finalist austint westlake and and 3 point loss to abeliene cooper who has one of the most dynamic players in the state in lorenzo joe. i think cedar park is the katy of 4a, they can win d1 or d2 title. no way to ever know but i think cedar park would have gotten them. [b]dawson has the most starters in the district coming back from playoff teams to i think they the favorites to represent region 3 in d1.[/b]
[/quote]
shhhhh! your gonna upset demdawgs. ;D
[/quote]

Vidor just needs to worry about beating Nederland.  Sounding highly unlikely ...but am pulling for you guys.  Vidor definitely gets the heart award.  Any team with kids the size of most middle schools that can still compete gets a big pat on the back.

I'm gonna trash talk as much as I can this year ...but SC needs to prove they can beat teams like Aledo, Cedar Creek, Guyer, etc.
[/quote]

Georgetown, Magnolia West..
[/quote]

This year's GT is no prob ...I'm curious to see if they go the same route as Humble.  [b]MW ate up a weak inexperienced SC defense on the ground. [/b]
[/quote]
dude, we ate up your defense on the ground. had we not turned it over 6 times, who knows.
[/quote]

Yep ...moved the ball well ...but that's also about playing hide and seek with the football too.  It's not like you had 3 guys that you could put in the I-formation and dominate.  You owned the ground and SC owned the air.  Our passing attack was too much, plain and simple.  Also, you have to cancel some of those turnovers because you got a couple extra drives due to successful onside kicks (was impressed with the aggressive play calling btw).
[/quote]
i'm just making the point that your defense wasn't good enough to win a title. you blame the d for MW and I'm saying it didn't help you this past season either. you blame enrollment #'s, but in reality, it was the defense. I think you know this. and yes, we had no answer for your passing game. in fact we knew it was going to be the difference before hand. we needed to play mistake free and keep Sharp on the sideline but it didn't work out that way.
[/quote]

You're right about the defense.  They played a bend-but-don't-break style.  I don't recall seeing too many sacks during the year.  I also don't recall a game where our defense would get the game ball ...but they did make some key plays from time to time.  Crosby game stands out well.  We had a key stop on 4th and short on our side of the field.  Also had an INT in the endzone which was a back breaker. 

SC defense is going to be a HUGE indicator this year.  We have about 3 proven stand out players and a couple more that "should" be stand outs.  Really not seeing any big D lineman and that worries me.
[/quote]

I would think you move some of them D1 studs off the O side of the ball and put them at DBs or Safety... maybe 1 of the 5 or 6 at RB and move them to LBs... its about team play... and a decent WR makes for a hell of a DB most of the time... a 2nd or 3rd string RB makes a great LB...
[/quote]

That's coaching...right?  I did see Ford move one WR to DB and he turned out to be a decent cover corner.  I really don't recall any guys playing both ways on SC.  Would have been interesting to see how some of those guys would have done on the opposite side of the ball.  Aldridge may have been an awesome LB.  He didn't run too much as we all know. He had energy to burn.  During the regular season we really didn't need anyone to play both ways, but agree it would have been a smart move to try guys in different spots.  It may of helped extend the playoff run.

[Mr. Buddy Garrity]

[quote name="Coach Comeaux" post="1414709" timestamp="1371677344"]
[quote author=DemDAWGS! link=topic=112605.msg1414704#msg1414704 date=1371676793]
[quote author=dustoff03 link=topic=112605.msg1414693#msg1414693 date=1371676458]
[quote author=DemDAWGS! link=topic=112605.msg1414691#msg1414691 date=1371676073]
[quote author=dustoff03 link=topic=112605.msg1414684#msg1414684 date=1371675600]
[quote author=DemDAWGS! link=topic=112605.msg1414680#msg1414680 date=1371675366]
[quote author=ram0524 link=topic=112605.msg1414671#msg1414671 date=1371674661]
[quote author=DemDAWGS! link=topic=112605.msg1414669#msg1414669 date=1371674535]
[quote author=dustoff03 link=topic=112605.msg1414665#msg1414665 date=1371673968]
[quote author=cougar14 link=topic=112605.msg1414644#msg1414644 date=1371671934]
[quote author=aschom78 link=topic=112605.msg1414556#msg1414556 date=1371658533]
[quote author=cougar14 link=topic=112605.msg1414520#msg1414520 date=1371653818]
[quote author=flyonwall12 link=topic=112605.msg1414506#msg1414506 date=1371650090]
[quote author=Mr. Buddy Garrity link=topic=112605.msg1414452#msg1414452 date=1371613799]
[quote author=aschom78 link=topic=112605.msg1414450#msg1414450 date=1371613177]
Marshall, Elgin, and Lovejoy are a bit low, [b]Aledo a bit too high[/b] IMO
[/quote]Yes!
[/quote]

Don't think Aledo is too high. Lost last year to Guyer and bring back a junior RB that is almost as good as Gray. If they go Division 2 they'll be the favorites. Division 1, same as last year. 2nd round for the title.
[/quote]I actually think Cedar Park is the favorite in D2 rather Aledo goes or not. 16 returning starters from a state title team. IMO Cedar Park would have beaten Guyer. WF Ryder is high, Marshall and Dawson are low on the poll. I think Dawson is top 5 when the AP poll comes out though.
[/quote]
I don't think Cedar Park would have beaten Guyer last year, I think they would this upcoming season if they played. I think Aledo is top 10, just not #3. Dawson is just a wee bit overrated, they have they players to win it all its just that they played too sloppy last season and a few of the players would throw tantrums when something didn't go their way. If they can tighten things up next season then I don't think anyone in 4a will be able to stop them.
[/quote]IDK, Guyer was blown out twice last year while Cedar Park's two 5a losses were to semi-finalist austint westlake and and 3 point loss to abeliene cooper who has one of the most dynamic players in the state in lorenzo joe. i think cedar park is the katy of 4a, they can win d1 or d2 title. no way to ever know but i think cedar park would have gotten them. [b]dawson has the most starters in the district coming back from playoff teams to i think they the favorites to represent region 3 in d1.[/b]
[/quote]
shhhhh! your gonna upset demdawgs. ;D
[/quote]

Vidor just needs to worry about beating Nederland.  Sounding highly unlikely ...but am pulling for you guys.  Vidor definitely gets the heart award.  Any team with kids the size of most middle schools that can still compete gets a big pat on the back.

I'm gonna trash talk as much as I can this year ...but SC needs to prove they can beat teams like Aledo, Cedar Creek, Guyer, etc.
[/quote]

Georgetown, Magnolia West..
[/quote]

This year's GT is no prob ...I'm curious to see if they go the same route as Humble.  [b]MW ate up a weak inexperienced SC defense on the ground. [/b]
[/quote]
dude, we ate up your defense on the ground. had we not turned it over 6 times, who knows.
[/quote]

Yep ...moved the ball well ...but that's also about playing hide and seek with the football too.  It's not like you had 3 guys that you could put in the I-formation and dominate.  You owned the ground and SC owned the air.  Our passing attack was too much, plain and simple.  Also, you have to cancel some of those turnovers because you got a couple extra drives due to successful onside kicks (was impressed with the aggressive play calling btw).
[/quote]
i'm just making the point that your defense wasn't good enough to win a title. you blame the d for MW and I'm saying it didn't help you this past season either. you blame enrollment #'s, but in reality, it was the defense. I think you know this. and yes, we had no answer for your passing game. in fact we knew it was going to be the difference before hand. we needed to play mistake free and keep Sharp on the sideline but it didn't work out that way.
[/quote]

You're right about the defense.  They played a bend-but-don't-break style.  I don't recall seeing too many sacks during the year.  I also don't recall a game where our defense would get the game ball ...but they did make some key plays from time to time.  Crosby game stands out well.  We had a key stop on 4th and short on our side of the field.  Also had an INT in the endzone which was a back breaker. 

SC defense is going to be a HUGE indicator this year.  We have about 3 proven stand out players and a couple more that "should" be stand outs.  Really not seeing any big D lineman and that worries me.
[/quote]

I would think you move some of them D1 studs off the O side of the ball and put them at DBs or Safety... maybe 1 of the 5 or 6 at RB and move them to LBs... its about team play... and a decent WR makes for a hell of a DB most of the time... a 2nd or 3rd string RB makes a great LB...
[/quote]You gotta remember their DEPTH problem Coach.  ;)

[snafu]

[quote name="DemDAWGS!" post="1414713" timestamp="1371677889"]
[quote author=Coach Comeaux link=topic=112605.msg1414709#msg1414709 date=1371677344]
[quote author=DemDAWGS! link=topic=112605.msg1414704#msg1414704 date=1371676793]
[quote author=dustoff03 link=topic=112605.msg1414693#msg1414693 date=1371676458]
[quote author=DemDAWGS! link=topic=112605.msg1414691#msg1414691 date=1371676073]
[quote author=dustoff03 link=topic=112605.msg1414684#msg1414684 date=1371675600]
[quote author=DemDAWGS! link=topic=112605.msg1414680#msg1414680 date=1371675366]
[quote author=ram0524 link=topic=112605.msg1414671#msg1414671 date=1371674661]
[quote author=DemDAWGS! link=topic=112605.msg1414669#msg1414669 date=1371674535]
[quote author=dustoff03 link=topic=112605.msg1414665#msg1414665 date=1371673968]
[quote author=cougar14 link=topic=112605.msg1414644#msg1414644 date=1371671934]
[quote author=aschom78 link=topic=112605.msg1414556#msg1414556 date=1371658533]
[quote author=cougar14 link=topic=112605.msg1414520#msg1414520 date=1371653818]
[quote author=flyonwall12 link=topic=112605.msg1414506#msg1414506 date=1371650090]
[quote author=Mr. Buddy Garrity link=topic=112605.msg1414452#msg1414452 date=1371613799]
[quote author=aschom78 link=topic=112605.msg1414450#msg1414450 date=1371613177]
Marshall, Elgin, and Lovejoy are a bit low, [b]Aledo a bit too high[/b] IMO
[/quote]Yes!
[/quote]

Don't think Aledo is too high. Lost last year to Guyer and bring back a junior RB that is almost as good as Gray. If they go Division 2 they'll be the favorites. Division 1, same as last year. 2nd round for the title.
[/quote]I actually think Cedar Park is the favorite in D2 rather Aledo goes or not. 16 returning starters from a state title team. IMO Cedar Park would have beaten Guyer. WF Ryder is high, Marshall and Dawson are low on the poll. I think Dawson is top 5 when the AP poll comes out though.
[/quote]
I don't think Cedar Park would have beaten Guyer last year, I think they would this upcoming season if they played. I think Aledo is top 10, just not #3. Dawson is just a wee bit overrated, they have they players to win it all its just that they played too sloppy last season and a few of the players would throw tantrums when something didn't go their way. If they can tighten things up next season then I don't think anyone in 4a will be able to stop them.
[/quote]IDK, Guyer was blown out twice last year while Cedar Park's two 5a losses were to semi-finalist austint westlake and and 3 point loss to abeliene cooper who has one of the most dynamic players in the state in lorenzo joe. i think cedar park is the katy of 4a, they can win d1 or d2 title. no way to ever know but i think cedar park would have gotten them. [b]dawson has the most starters in the district coming back from playoff teams to i think they the favorites to represent region 3 in d1.[/b]
[/quote]
shhhhh! your gonna upset demdawgs. ;D
[/quote]

Vidor just needs to worry about beating Nederland.  Sounding highly unlikely ...but am pulling for you guys.  Vidor definitely gets the heart award.  Any team with kids the size of most middle schools that can still compete gets a big pat on the back.

I'm gonna trash talk as much as I can this year ...but SC needs to prove they can beat teams like Aledo, Cedar Creek, Guyer, etc.
[/quote]

Georgetown, Magnolia West..
[/quote]

This year's GT is no prob ...I'm curious to see if they go the same route as Humble.  [b]MW ate up a weak inexperienced SC defense on the ground. [/b]
[/quote]
dude, we ate up your defense on the ground. had we not turned it over 6 times, who knows.
[/quote]

Yep ...moved the ball well ...but that's also about playing hide and seek with the football too.  It's not like you had 3 guys that you could put in the I-formation and dominate.  You owned the ground and SC owned the air.  Our passing attack was too much, plain and simple.  Also, you have to cancel some of those turnovers because you got a couple extra drives due to successful onside kicks (was impressed with the aggressive play calling btw).
[/quote]
i'm just making the point that your defense wasn't good enough to win a title. you blame the d for MW and I'm saying it didn't help you this past season either. you blame enrollment #'s, but in reality, it was the defense. I think you know this. and yes, we had no answer for your passing game. in fact we knew it was going to be the difference before hand. we needed to play mistake free and keep Sharp on the sideline but it didn't work out that way.
[/quote]

You're right about the defense.  They played a bend-but-don't-break style.  I don't recall seeing too many sacks during the year.  I also don't recall a game where our defense would get the game ball ...but they did make some key plays from time to time.  Crosby game stands out well.  We had a key stop on 4th and short on our side of the field.  Also had an INT in the endzone which was a back breaker. 

SC defense is going to be a HUGE indicator this year.  We have about 3 proven stand out players and a couple more that "should" be stand outs.  Really not seeing any big D lineman and that worries me.
[/quote]

I would think you move some of them D1 studs off the O side of the ball and put them at DBs or Safety... maybe 1 of the 5 or 6 at RB and move them to LBs... its about team play... and a decent WR makes for a hell of a DB most of the time... a 2nd or 3rd string RB makes a great LB...
[/quote]

That's coaching...right?  I did see Ford move one WR to DB and he turned out to be a decent cover corner.  I really don't recall any guys playing both ways on SC.  Would have been interesting to see how some of those guys would have done on the opposite side of the ball.  Aldridge may have been an awesome LB.  He didn't run too much as we all know. He had energy to burn.  During the regular season we really didn't need anyone to play both ways, but agree it would have been a smart move to try guys in different spots.  It [s]may[/s] [b]would [/b]of helped extend the playoff run.
[/quote]

Having 450 yds rushing put on you to me is a tell tell sign... you need to change something up...

[DemDAWGS!]

Garrity, I know that was a sarcastic remark, but not sure if you really mean we had a lot of players or not.  IMO, we had some horses to spare ...to a point.  Our JV was pretty dismal and didn't get much attention.  There might have been some depth to be found there.

[BrenhamFan]

17-4A looks strong

Georgetown
Elgin
Manor

We play them in the first round too...

[songone]

DemDawgs...
I'm not really a sh*% talker, but I understand why you feel the way you do.  SC is loaded and knocking on the door.  I'm going to side with you on this one.  8 starters returning on offense is a little too much for the competition to contend with.  Especially having to deal with Aaron Sharp (3 year starter) as their leader.  This kid is about to flat out destroy Region III, NO IF ANDS OR BUTS ABOUT IT!
I know... "What about the defense?"... 5 returning starters, but can anybody go blow for blow with that offense for that to be a factor?  At least in Region III.
[u][i][b]Barring injury... SC wins Region III Div1!  [/b] [/i] [/u]

[snafu]

[quote name="BrenhamFan" post="1414785" timestamp="1371700050"]
17-4A looks strong

[b]Georgetown [/b]
Elgin
Manor

We play them in the first round too...
[/quote]

Brenhamfan... please refrain from posting stuff about G'Town.... it sends chills down DemDawgs back  ;)  :)  :D  ;D ;D ;D

[DemDAWGS!]

[quote name="songone" post="1414799" timestamp="1371727708"]
DemDawgs...
I'm not really a sh*% talker, but I understand why you feel the way you do.  SC is loaded and knocking on the door.  I'm going to side with you on this one.  8 starters returning on offense is a little too much for the competition to contend with.  Especially having to deal with Aaron Sharp (3 year starter) as their leader.  This kid is about to flat out destroy Region III, NO IF ANDS OR BUTS ABOUT IT!
I know... "What about the defense?"... 5 returning starters, but can anybody go blow for blow with that offense for that to be a factor?  At least in Region III.
[u][i][b]Barring injury... SC wins Region III Div1!  [/b] [/i] [/u]
[/quote]

Love ur enthusiasm and I believe SC takes district if they get by hard fought games with Crosby and BH. These are games we're really going to need defense. After district, we'll see.  We should have a good sense of who this team is after the scrimmage and 1st couple games.

Aaron Sharp has improved each year. It's time to put this team on his shoulders and make a positive statement in the playoffs.

[DemDAWGS!]

[quote name="Coach Comeaux" post="1414823" timestamp="1371734483"]
[quote author=BrenhamFan link=topic=112605.msg1414785#msg1414785 date=1371700050]
17-4A looks strong

[b]Georgetown [/b]
Elgin
Manor

We play them in the first round too...
[/quote]

Brenhamfan... please refrain from posting stuff about G'Town.... it sends chills down DemDawgs back  ;)  :)  :D  ;D ;D ;D
[/quote]

Nobody is scared of GT this year. They might as well be Dayton or PNG.

[Mr. Buddy Garrity]

[quote name="DemDAWGS!" post="1414843" timestamp="1371737103"]
[quote author=Coach Comeaux link=topic=112605.msg1414823#msg1414823 date=1371734483]
[quote author=BrenhamFan link=topic=112605.msg1414785#msg1414785 date=1371700050]
17-4A looks strong

[b]Georgetown [/b]
Elgin
Manor

We play them in the first round too...
[/quote]

Brenhamfan... please refrain from posting stuff about G'Town.... it sends chills down DemDawgs back  ;)  :)  :D  ;D ;D ;D
[/quote]

Nobody is scared of GT this year. They might as well be Dayton or PNG.
[/quote]oh, ok.

[Octfeb]

[quote name="DemDAWGS!" post="1414843" timestamp="1371737103"]
[quote author=Coach Comeaux link=topic=112605.msg1414823#msg1414823 date=1371734483]
[quote author=BrenhamFan link=topic=112605.msg1414785#msg1414785 date=1371700050]
17-4A looks strong

[b]Georgetown [/b]
Elgin
Manor

We play them in the first round too...
[/quote]

Brenhamfan... please refrain from posting stuff about G'Town.... it sends chills down DemDawgs back  ;)  :)  :D  ;D ;D ;D
[/quote]

Nobody is scared of GT this year. [b]They might as well be Dayton[/b] or PNG.
[/quote] Keep underestimating Dayton... Like it was said before they had some internal issues late in the season. Won't be a issue this season...  (Which is no excuse, just a fact) SC and Nederland beat Dayton fair and square... Dayton may lose again against SC this year... But I sure hope Dayton makes yall sweat in a close one if Dayton does lose. I'll be zooming in with my "lil ole camera", (as your buddy scitis likes to call it) up close to see the sweat rolling off yall's heads...  :P

[Mr. Buddy Garrity]

[quote name="OctFeb" post="1414931" timestamp="1371750416"]
[quote author=DemDAWGS! link=topic=112605.msg1414843#msg1414843 date=1371737103]
[quote author=Coach Comeaux link=topic=112605.msg1414823#msg1414823 date=1371734483]
[quote author=BrenhamFan link=topic=112605.msg1414785#msg1414785 date=1371700050]
17-4A looks strong

[b]Georgetown [/b]
Elgin
Manor

We play them in the first round too...
[/quote]

Brenhamfan... please refrain from posting stuff about G'Town.... it sends chills down DemDawgs back  ;)  :)  :D  ;D ;D ;D
[/quote]

Nobody is scared of GT this year. [b]They might as well be Dayton[/b] or PNG.
[/quote] Keep underestimating Dayton... Like it was said before they had some internal issues late in the season. Won't be a issue this season...  (Which is no excuse, just a fact) SC and Nederland beat Dayton fair and square... Dayton may lose again against SC this year... But I sure hope Dayton makes yall sweat in a close one if Dayton does lose. I'll be zooming in with my "lil ole camera", (as your buddy scitis likes to call it) up close to see the sweat rolling off yall's heads...  :P
[/quote]I'll be at that game. Pretty sure Dayton will have more fans than SC in Turner Stadium that night  ;)

[CAL2TEX]

[quote name="Mr. Buddy Garrity" post="1414932" timestamp="1371750582"]
[quote author=OctFeb link=topic=112605.msg1414931#msg1414931 date=1371750416]
[quote author=DemDAWGS! link=topic=112605.msg1414843#msg1414843 date=1371737103]
[quote author=Coach Comeaux link=topic=112605.msg1414823#msg1414823 date=1371734483]
[quote author=BrenhamFan link=topic=112605.msg1414785#msg1414785 date=1371700050]
17-4A looks strong

[b]Georgetown [/b]
Elgin
Manor

We play them in the first round too...
[/quote]

Brenhamfan... please refrain from posting stuff about G'Town.... it sends chills down DemDawgs back  ;)  :)  :D  ;D ;D ;D
[/quote]

Nobody is scared of GT this year. [b]They might as well be Dayton[/b] or PNG.
[/quote] Keep underestimating Dayton... Like it was said before they had some internal issues late in the season. Won't be a issue this season...  (Which is no excuse, just a fact) SC and Nederland beat Dayton fair and square... Dayton may lose again against SC this year... But I sure hope Dayton makes yall sweat in a close one if Dayton does lose. I'll be zooming in with my "lil ole camera", (as your buddy scitis likes to call it) up close to see the sweat rolling off yall's heads...  :P
[/quote]I'll be at that game. [b]Pretty sure Dayton will have more fans than SC in Turner Stadium that night[/b]  ;)
[/quote]

Please get a shot of those 10,000 fans on the SC side OctFeb that we keep hearing so much about.

[Octfeb]

[quote name="CAL2TEX" post="1414942" timestamp="1371751973"]
[quote author=Mr. Buddy Garrity link=topic=112605.msg1414932#msg1414932 date=1371750582]
[quote author=OctFeb link=topic=112605.msg1414931#msg1414931 date=1371750416]
[quote author=DemDAWGS! link=topic=112605.msg1414843#msg1414843 date=1371737103]
[quote author=Coach Comeaux link=topic=112605.msg1414823#msg1414823 date=1371734483]
[quote author=BrenhamFan link=topic=112605.msg1414785#msg1414785 date=1371700050]
17-4A looks strong

[b]Georgetown [/b]
Elgin
Manor

We play them in the first round too...
[/quote]

Brenhamfan... please refrain from posting stuff about G'Town.... it sends chills down DemDawgs back  ;)  :)  :D  ;D ;D ;D
[/quote]

Nobody is scared of GT this year. [b]They might as well be Dayton[/b] or PNG.
[/quote] Keep underestimating Dayton... Like it was said before they had some internal issues late in the season. Won't be a issue this season...  (Which is no excuse, just a fact) SC and Nederland beat Dayton fair and square... Dayton may lose again against SC this year... But I sure hope Dayton makes yall sweat in a close one if Dayton does lose. I'll be zooming in with my "lil ole camera", (as your buddy scitis likes to call it) up close to see the sweat rolling off yall's heads...  :P
[/quote]I'll be at that game. [b]Pretty sure Dayton will have more fans than SC in Turner Stadium that night[/b]  ;)
[/quote]

Please get a shot of those 10,000 fans on the SC side OctFeb that we keep hearing so much about.
[/quote] you got it.... I will make sure... ;)

[bronco pride]

Dayton was 9-0 outscoring their district opponents 263-46. SC was 9-0 outscoring their district opponents 313-66. SC caught dayton with injuries and attitudes with very key players. SC won no doubt and was definitly the more hungry team but look at the scores throughout the year and i think without a doubt dayton just didnt show up to play.

[snafu]

[quote name="bronco pride" post="1414982" timestamp="1371756517"]
Dayton was 9-0 outscoring their district opponents 263-46. SC was 9-0 outscoring their district opponents 313-66. SC caught dayton with injuries and attitudes with very key players. SC won no doubt and was definitly the more hungry team but look at the scores throughout the year and i think without a doubt dayton just didnt show up to play.
[/quote]

Wasn't there a few disciplinary actions going on also??

[Mr. Buddy Garrity]

[quote name="Coach Comeaux" post="1414991" timestamp="1371757825"]
[quote author=bronco pride link=topic=112605.msg1414982#msg1414982 date=1371756517]
Dayton was 9-0 outscoring their district opponents 263-46. SC was 9-0 outscoring their district opponents 313-66. SC caught dayton with injuries and attitudes with very key players. SC won no doubt and was definitly the more hungry team but look at the scores throughout the year and i think without a doubt dayton just didnt show up to play.
[/quote]

Wasn't there a few disciplinary actions going on also??
[/quote]They had internal issues last season. I dont think that will be going on this year.

[Octfeb]

[quote name="Coach Comeaux" post="1414991" timestamp="1371757825"]
[quote author=bronco pride link=topic=112605.msg1414982#msg1414982 date=1371756517]
Dayton was 9-0 outscoring their district opponents 263-46. SC was 9-0 outscoring their district opponents 313-66. SC caught dayton with injuries and attitudes with very key players. SC won no doubt and was definitly the more hungry team but look at the scores throughout the year and i think without a doubt dayton just didnt show up to play.
[/quote]

Wasn't there a few disciplinary actions going on also??
[/quote] If you wanna call it that coach.... Some very poor attitudes (with some key players) like bronco pride said. with that happening makes the team as a whole out of pocket... People can believe what they want.. Dayton was not playing up to their potential that night.. and everybody on the Dayton side knew it... But it is what it is.... SC came to win and thats what they did....