Jump to content

Strong Coaching Pedigree


UTfanatic

Recommended Posts

58 minutes ago, UTfanatic said:

Smart phone

 

1 hour ago, Bandwagon Ranger said:

Looks like someone has been at the bar.

Lol actually my nephew Use to play for Texas WR Marcus Johnson and he said it was in a group text...I wasn't saying it was the deciding factor just one of them 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, D3zii said:

 

Lol actually my nephew Use to play for Texas WR Marcus Johnson and he said it was in a group text...I wasn't saying it was the deciding factor just one of them 

Nah. I was only talking about the typing not the subject matter.

I hope he stays. If he gets a 1st round grade, if I were him I would take the money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/10/2016 at 2:13 PM, Bandwagon Ranger said:

Nah. I was only talking about the typing not the subject matter.

I hope he stays. If he gets a 1st round grade, if I were him I would take the money.

I don't think he will be.  Right now, looks like 3rd or 4th round.   He also has a kid which might factor in.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/30/2016 at 8:08 AM, UTfanatic said:

I heard it live on Texas Postgame on LHN live

 

more mad than defiant!

 Hookem 

 Looking at it now, a win over Baylor wasn't much.  Baylor's over rated.    If Briles was still at Baylor, Texas would have gotten spanked again!   BRILES to Texas!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Reagan said:

 Looking at it now, a win over Baylor wasn't much.  Baylor's over rated.    If Briles was still at Baylor, Texas would have gotten spanked again!   BRILES to Texas!!

Good try newbie.

If like Briles so much, Let him come live in your house. 

Slime like that at Texas would bring back shots from the Tower. 

Hookem

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, UTfanatic said:

Good try newbie.

If like Briles so much, Let him come live in your house. 

Slime like that at Texas would bring back shots from the Tower. 

Hookem

An excellent try, I might add.  Yes, Briles would have spanked Texas again.  Slime?  You know that for a fact?  Or, did they use him as a scape goat and did to him what Penn State did to Joe Pa? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined



  • Posts

    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...