Peppermint Patty Posted February 20, 2014 Report Share Posted February 20, 2014 Q: Why do you think Charlie Strong is attacking Texas A&M with his “gadget†comment? Shouldn’t he just worry about his own team that might not win enough games to go bowling? Hector F., Houston Hayes: Strong is doing exactly what the Texas coach, at some point, had to do by defining rival Texas A&M for what it is the last two years: third-place in the SEC West Division in 2012; fourth-place in 2013. I’m not sure I’d call it “gadget†but you get the picture. For all the hype surrounding the Aggies, what have they done other than introduce the world to the wonder that was Johnny Manziel? It’s certainly not their play against the SEC elite in ranked games (six losses in two seasons), or that thrilling come-from-behind win over Duke in the Chick-Fil-A Bowl. Think about this: two years ago, Kevin Sumlin had Houston unbeaten and playing in the Conference USA Championship Game – and lost to Southern Miss. Since then, he has led Texas A&M to a 20-6 record, signed a $5 million a year contract, and spearheaded momentum that convinced the university to undertake a $400 million renovation of Kyle Field. It’s an amazing story, really – usually reserved for a program that has won a national (or even conference) title. Not for a team that used one magical game (the 2012 win at Alabama) to redefine a program. UTfanatic 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthoftheBorder Posted February 20, 2014 Report Share Posted February 20, 2014 This ought to get on onslaught of vitriolic posts from the faithful!!! UTfanatic 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UTfanatic Posted February 22, 2014 Report Share Posted February 22, 2014 facts are facts History cannot be changed! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.