Jump to content

YESSIR!!


PhatMack19

Recommended Posts

No, they did add Clemson, a southern school in their SEC footprint. They are not about to get smoked outside of the southern region.


It was a problem with the home dates with Oregon and they wouldn't switch years. They year A&M was supposed to be on the road would have left the Ags with a short number of home games. Clemson was a good add
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"We Regret The SEC"

While the ass-whippen' that Alabama put on A&M was hard to watch.

There are very few Aggie's that regret the decision to go to the SEC in any way, shape or form - so far we are very happy there.

I agree. Ags would be middle of the pack in any conference. At least you can gravy train those other teams.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They wouldn't be at the bottom of the barrel in the big 12, I can assure u of that.
Big difference in sec west and anyone from big 12


Big difference between "bottom of the barrel" and "middle of the pack." That readin' thing failed you again.

And "big difference in sec west and anyone from big 12"? I can assure you that there are more than a few teams in the big 12 that wouldn't need a last second fg to beat Florida! 😂😂😂😂
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Big difference between "bottom of the barrel" and "middle of the pack." That readin' thing failed you again.

And "big difference in sec west and anyone from big 12"? I can assure you that there are more than a few teams in the big 12 that wouldn't need a last second fg to beat Florida!

Yeah - middle of the pack you may well be right - However, they would still be better this year than that team that wears Orange and White.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah - middle of the pack you may well be right - However, they would still be better this year than that team that wears Orange and White.


I think you are correct. However, if Texas had played smu/rice/Lamar already, they would have 3 more wins on their schedule. Add la Monroe as a win as well.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you are correct. However, if Texas had played smu/rice/Lamar already, they would have 3 more wins on their schedule. Add la Monroe as a win as well.

You may well be right - but which powerhouse programs would Texas have have to give up:  North Texas? (yeah they also beat SMU), Kansas? or perhaps Iowa State?

 

Sorry but in my opinion the teams that Texas has played are not that much stronger than the teams that A&M has played.  Rice and Lamar have won more games than Kansas, North Texas and Iowa State combined.  Notice I did leave SMU out since they have not won a game - but when they were scheduled they were not that bad a program.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You may well be right - but which powerhouse programs would Texas have have to give up:  North Texas? (yeah they also beat SMU), Kansas? or perhaps Iowa State?

 

Sorry but in my opinion the teams that Texas has played are not that much stronger than the teams that A&M has played.  Rice and Lamar have won more games than Kansas, North Texas and Iowa State combined.  Notice I did leave SMU out since they have not won a game - but when they were scheduled they were not that bad a program.

There a difference between conference and non confererence opponents. You control who your non conference opponents are!

Unfortunatley TAMU only gets to play USC once in a year.

 

Same goes for Ole Miss, Auburn, and Alabama.

 

 

 

[sharedmedia=core:attachments:152]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,106
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    BlakeJ8
    Newest Member
    BlakeJ8
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Yes, but not as bad. I don’t know for sure how many at TC, but most of lm kids in Dickinson and Hitchcock 
    • Question: will this have a big effect on Texas City? 
    • Sooo…. I’m calling this right now!!! Next realignment, expect the coogs to be back and potentially 5a d2, if what i heard from educators is true. LM and Ball are the red head step kids of g county and were the last to get new schools and stadiums(ball and lm new schools are under construction with lm getting new stadium and ball got theirs renovated). Once these projects are completed, everyone will be zoned BACK to where they live. LM middle school is over crowded. I predict Hitchcock won’t be good after realignment because I promise u most of those kids are LM kids. Currently u can pretty much attend any school in the district and get away with it… well not for long.
    • Win 4-3 Verlander  pretty good at times with rocky start.  Win 88 games Looks like we play Tigers Tuesday TBD
    • The advantage I think PAM have is Ball have not played any real defenses. Manvel is a shell of what they use to be and friendswood not so good this year. Those were the top schools they played. The rest  was sterling and Texas City and a hisd school.  if I’m worried about anything is ball have a few play makers. The secondary MUST BE  COME WITH THE BEST GAME. offensively, finally the OC and Morgan is letting him run. 2/11 and 2 picks that killed potential scoring drives won’t cut it. From what I hear, ball qb isn’t that great under pressure. Welp I’ll be tailgating at the ex’s family house on the corner of N and 28th lol
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...