Big girl Posted May 8, 2014 Report Share Posted May 8, 2014 Wouldn't it feel the same if he was one of 50? I'm really struggling to follow your logic that reducing casualties wouldn't matter because there would still be casualties? you made it seem as if having ONLY 15 casualties instead of 35 is a great reason to oppose stricter gun laws Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenash Posted May 8, 2014 Report Share Posted May 8, 2014 you made it seem as if having ONLY 15 casualties instead of 35 is a great reason to oppose stricter gun lawsThink how many lives would be saved if we outlawed automobiles. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted May 8, 2014 Report Share Posted May 8, 2014 Think how many lives would be saved if we outlawed automobiles. I never said we should outlaw guns :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PAMFAM10 Posted May 8, 2014 Report Share Posted May 8, 2014 Think how many lives would be saved if we outlawed automobiles. automobiles wasn't invented to kill guns are. Big girl 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted May 8, 2014 Report Share Posted May 8, 2014 automobiles wasn't invented to kill guns are. yep Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
77 Posted May 8, 2014 Author Report Share Posted May 8, 2014 to kill or protect? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
77 Posted May 8, 2014 Author Report Share Posted May 8, 2014 here's one for all the haters of the 2nd amendment! http://cnsnews.com/video/cnsnews/loading-gun-show-info-0?utm_source=Facebook&utm_medium=Marketing&utm_term=Facebook&utm_content=Facebook&utm_ca Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bullets13 Posted May 8, 2014 Report Share Posted May 8, 2014 you made it seem as if having ONLY 15 casualties instead of 35 is a great reason to oppose stricter gun laws I didn't mention the first thing about gun laws, or give any opinion about gun laws. The only opinion i gave is that it could be beneficial to have accessible guns for teachers on campus. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenash Posted May 8, 2014 Report Share Posted May 8, 2014 All homes should be made of asbestos, thereby saving lives from fires. We need the federal government to intervene and require all future construction to meet that requirement. We also need the Fed to mandate that all existing homes be altered to meet the requirements. Your income level will determine just how much government assistance you will get for the conversion. If you dont agree, you simply want people to die in fires. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tvc184 Posted May 8, 2014 Report Share Posted May 8, 2014 you made it seem as if having ONLY 15 casualties instead of 35 is a great reason to oppose stricter gun laws What gun laws will stop spree killings? I will just use TX law as an example. Kill any two people and it is a death penalty case. Kill any child under 10 years old and it is a death penalty case. It is a felony l for a person already convicted of a felony to purchase or possess a firearm anyway. Those laws are already here. A felon cannot even possess a firearm or I think under federal law, even the ammo without a firearm. To kill a single child in an elementary school is a likely death sentence. With it already being a felony to buy or possess firearms or ammo and likely getting the death sentence either by court or a self inflicted wound after a person has inflicted enough damage, what law will prevent such as attack? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
5GallonBucket Posted May 9, 2014 Report Share Posted May 9, 2014 they won't ever get it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PAMFAM10 Posted May 9, 2014 Report Share Posted May 9, 2014 What gun laws will stop spree killings? I will just use TX law as an example. Kill any two people and it is a death penalty case. Kill any child under 10 years old and it is a death penalty case. It is a felony l for a person already convicted of a felony to purchase or possess a firearm anyway. Those laws are already here. A felon cannot even possess a firearm or I think under federal law, even the ammo without a firearm. To kill a single child in an elementary school is a likely death sentence. With it already being a felony to buy or possess firearms or ammo and likely getting the death sentence either by court or a self inflicted wound after a person has inflicted enough damage, what law will prevent such as attack? look I age with you on that but a ban on assault rifles would help. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smitty Posted May 9, 2014 Report Share Posted May 9, 2014 look I age with you on that but a ban on assault rifles would help. PAM, can you guarantee that criminals would not get assault rifles if there were a ban? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted May 9, 2014 Report Share Posted May 9, 2014 look I age with you on that but a ban on assault rifles would help. yep, even Reagan agreed with that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted May 9, 2014 Report Share Posted May 9, 2014 PAM, can you guarantee that criminals would not get assault rifles if there were a ban? screw it. Why dont we bring back duals (msp????). We can all just shoot each other dead in the streets. Lmbo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PAMFAM10 Posted May 9, 2014 Report Share Posted May 9, 2014 PAM, can you guarantee that criminals would not get assault rifles if there were a ban? how do criminals get assault weapons. .. think on it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smitty Posted May 9, 2014 Report Share Posted May 9, 2014 how do criminals get assault weapons. .. think on it. They steal them. That's why they call them criminals. But, if you are saying that if the US stops making them, then they'll smuggle them. We have a ban on drugs, don't we?! Think about it... PS - Will the military still have access to assault rifles? How about police departments? If so, then that means they are still being made. If so, then that means they can be stolen. What say you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
5GallonBucket Posted May 9, 2014 Report Share Posted May 9, 2014 can t fix stupid Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LumRaiderFan Posted May 9, 2014 Report Share Posted May 9, 2014 look I age with you on that but a ban on assault rifles would help. Define" assault" rifle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PAMFAM10 Posted May 10, 2014 Report Share Posted May 10, 2014 They steal them. That's why they call them criminals. But, if you are saying that if the US stops making them, then they'll smuggle them. We have a ban on drugs, don't we?! Think about it... PS - Will the military still have access to assault rifles? How about police departments? If so, then that means they are still being made. If so, then that means they can be stolen. What say you?I said ban not take away from military or cops. It shouldn't be so easy to get a ak47. And using your theory we should unban drugs and murder huh because people still do it. Think about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Englebert Posted May 10, 2014 Report Share Posted May 10, 2014 Define" assault" rifle. I'm curious too. PamFam10, define "assault" rifle. What characteristics separate an "assault" rifle from a "non-assault" rifle? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PAMFAM10 Posted May 10, 2014 Report Share Posted May 10, 2014 Not just assault rifles ..Guns like Ak-47s, M-16s, Uzis, tech9s, guns that designed to kill a lot in a matter of seconds. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenash Posted May 10, 2014 Report Share Posted May 10, 2014 There are nuts everywhere. Ft hood shooting was by a military guy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PAMFAM10 Posted May 10, 2014 Report Share Posted May 10, 2014 So just curious what should we do to stop mass shootings not just in schools. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
77 Posted May 10, 2014 Author Report Share Posted May 10, 2014 cant stop all of them but the more sane folks that are armed will slow it down! jmo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.