Jessie Haynes....I bet this gets good

[BLUEDOVE3]

So your the Chief who had the officer change his report 3 times to benefit Haynes?

LOL!!! Its called disagreeing with your report. Haynes and this officer saw or perceived two different things. And maybe the officer perceived Haynes or whomever was trying to get him to change his report. But in reality just disagreeing.

[BLUEDOVE3]

^{Why is the NAACP there?}

Racism is dead. Why on earth are they there?

[BLUEDOVE3]

Probably not. He will simply fire the officer and deny everything like his mentor (and maybe more), Haynes. 

 

It will all come down to a he said/she said ..... unless the officer was smart enough to record the incidents after the first occurrence..... assuming it happened.......

Good points!!

[stevenash]

Racism is dead. Why on earth are they there?

couldnt disagree more.  Racism is everywhere and every time somebody does something wrong, the reason for the committing of that wrong is based in racism and, resultantly, should be tolerated and/or accepted.

[BLUEDOVE3]

couldnt disagree more.  Racism is everywhere and every time somebody does something wrong, the reason for the committing of that wrong is based in racism and, resultantly, should be tolerated and/or accepted.

Well, this doesn't mean that I have to agree with your above statements. I mean , you finally have a Black President & your commander-in-chief. 

[stevenash]

Hallelujah. And don't forget an integrity laden attorney general.  I just wish the President didn't have  to find out about all of these scandals by reading it in the newspapers.  You would think that Valerie Jarret or some other staff members would have kept him abreast of things so he could be outraged and take steps to remedy these issues.( after a 2 or 3 year "investigation", of course)  Apparently, Harvard Law School and the Chicago School of Advanced Community Organizing failed to instruct him appropriately on the concepts of responsible leadership and "The Buck Stops Here"

[PhatMack19]

@Brittany12News: Jury finds the defendant, Jessie Haynes, guilty of obstructing a passageway @12NewsSETX #haynestrial

[5GallonBucket]

Get ready for a March by the non racist NAACP

[BLUEDOVE3]

Get ready for a March by the non racist NAACP

Race Card Alert!!!!

[bullets13]

 

Race Card Alert!!!!

 
Race Card Alert if there are protests in her defense after a jury that was 50% African American found her guilty in less than 40 minutes of deliberation, and after we ALL have seen the clear video evidence of her guilt.

[Bigdog]

Yep,  pretty quick verdict too.

 

http://www.beaumontenterprise.com/news/article/Judge-hands-down-sentence-in-Haynes-trial-5498213.php

[westend1]

I am truly surprised.

[Bigdog]

I am truly surprised.

 

By the verdict?  Why?

[stevenash]

Dove, based upon what you have heard and know about this case, do you believe the defendant did anything wrong?

[thetragichippy]

Max fine to!!

[westend1]

By the verdict?  Why?

I just thought the defense threw up enough smoke where the jury wouldnt be able to agree.  I mean, you have the districts attorney testifying for the defense.  Not to mention the whole race thing.

[fox]

I just thought the defense threw up enough smoke where the jury wouldnt be able to agree.  I mean, you have the districts attorney testifying for the defense.  Not to mention the whole race thing.

the attorney was trying to protect the district from the law suit that is coming

[Bigdog]

I just thought the defense threw up enough smoke where the jury wouldnt be able to agree.  I mean, you have the districts attorney testifying for the defense.  Not to mention the whole race thing.

 

The video pretty much tells the story, which is one of the reasons police officers have dash cams.  I agree with you Fox, the attorney was only there to protect the district.   I wonder if she will have to forfeit her "assault pay" for the 8 months she sat at home?

[Bigdog]

Also the fact that a racially equal jury convicted her in less than an hour pretty much threw the "race card" out the window.

[thetragichippy]

Also the fact that a racially equal jury convicted her in less than an hour pretty much threw the "race card" out the window.

YUP

[BLUEDOVE3]

The "race card alert" was initiated when some of yall saw 50% of the jury was of color. So automatically  figured it would be a hung jury. 

[fox]

The "race card alert" was initiated when some of yall saw 50% of the jury was of color. So automatically  figured it would be a hung jury. 

[thetragichippy]

The "race card alert" was initiated when some of yall saw 50% of the jury was of color. So automatically figured it would be a hung jury.

I noticed there were no women on the Jury......I must be sexist

[BLUEDOVE3]

I noticed there were no women on the Jury......I must be sexist

And I ASSUMED there were women. All men? HMMM?

[tvc184]

I just thought the defense threw up enough smoke where the jury wouldnt be able to agree.  I mean, you have the districts attorney testifying for the defense.  Not to mention the whole race thing.

 

I agree. By TX law she is clearly guilty in my opinion but I thought a hung jury was likely as the defense brought up enough reason for a juror, looking for a reason not to convict, could justify (in his/her own mind) a not guilty vote. I know that a juror does not have to justify a vote but I think in a juror's mind, he/she wants to be able to fall back on something.

 

I applaud all members of the jury for following the law and the judge's charge and not falling to politics.