Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 2 months later...
Posted

Consider the source....BUT;

 

BREAKING NEWS - WARRANT Jessie Haynes being sought for alleged probation violation

 

The Jefferson County Sheriff's Department is looking for Jessie Haynes on an allegation that she has violated the terms of her probations, according to law enforcement sources.

 

http://setinvestigates.com/

why do they keep picking on her…………….

Posted

KFDM obtained paperwork as part of the motion, including statements from two people at a church where Haynes reported 27 hours of community service at a church food pantry. Haynes provided the Probation Department with a copy of a brochure and newsletter that she created for the food pantry, work linked to her community service.

 

The statements indicated Haynes did not complete the hours of service.

 
on probation or not has nothing to do with it. she told the courts she did 27 hours of community service when she did not.
 
 
37.10. TAMPERING WITH GOVERNMENTAL RECORD. (a) A person commits an offense if he: (1) knowingly makes a false entry in, or false alteration of, a governmental record; (2) makes, presents, or uses any record, document, or thing with knowledge of its falsity and with intent that it be taken as a genuine governmental record;
Posted
Look, I hope they nail her, but this is what is reported.


Late Wednesday afternoon, the Jefferson County District Attorney's Office filed a motion to dismiss the judge's order to revoke probation, stating that under the law, timely and effective notice of appeal, and a pending appeal, mean Haynes is not subject to the conditions of probation under Texas law.

Judge Adams signed the order voiding the probation revocation.
Posted

Look, I hope they nail her, but this is what is reported.


Late Wednesday afternoon, the Jefferson County District Attorney's Office filed a motion to dismiss the judge's order to revoke probation, stating that under the law, timely and effective notice of appeal, and a pending appeal, mean Haynes is not subject to the conditions of probation under Texas law.

Judge Adams signed the order voiding the probation revocation.

you are right no probation violation but she still can not lie on a government document. 

 

from your link: read the last sentence

 

From D.A.'s Office:


Criminal District Attorney Cory Crenshaw releases the following statement:


Following the jury trial and conviction of Jessie Haynes earlier this year for Obstructing a Passageway, she timely filed a notice of appeal.  While her appeal is pending, she is not subject to conditions of probation under Texas law.  Documents were filed in accordance with standard procedure in her case concerning an alleged violation of her probation.  Due to the fact that her appeal is still pending and has not been finalized, the District Attorney’s Office promptly filed a motion to dismiss her alleged violations of probation and the court granted the motion.  Any alleged criminal activity contained within the probation violation will be investigated as a separate matter. 

 
Posted

Ah, but you missed the most important part:

 

http://kfdm.com/shared/news/top-stories/stories/kfdm_kfdm-learns-judge-dismisses-order-revoke-jessie-haynes-probation-11686.shtml

 

 

Following the jury trial and conviction of Jessie Haynes earlier this year for Obstructing a Passageway, she timely filed a notice of appeal.  While her appeal is pending, she is not subject to conditions of probation under Texas law.  Documents were filed in accordance with standard procedure in her case concerning an alleged violation of her probation.  Due to the fact that her appeal is still pending and has not been finalized, the District Attorney’s Office promptly filed a motion to dismiss her alleged violations of probation and the court granted the motion.  Any alleged criminal activity contained within the probation violation will be investigated as a separate matter. 

Posted
I am not sure I completely understand it. I know what it says and understand that the lie can be prosecuted separately. My problem is....how can she be held accountable for lying about community service, a condition of her probation, when her probation had not begun due to her appeal? I'm confused.

Like I said, I hope she gets everything she deserves.
Posted

Separate offense.  Even though it was about her "probation"  the act of lying to the court should be prosecuted separately.  It wouldn't matter if I were on probation or not, if I lied to the court about anything that is perjury.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,282
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Unknown472929300
    Newest Member
    Unknown472929300
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...