Mr. Buddy Garrity Posted May 31, 2014 Report Share Posted May 31, 2014 Nash love lairs he just nagging. Bring up WMDS (Lie Of Decade) watch him defend that lie.What WMD? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenash Posted May 31, 2014 Report Share Posted May 31, 2014 PamFAm- Weapons of mass destruction was voted on by everyone (including the Democrats who are so much "smarter" than everyone else. Hillary voted for the war. So no, I needn't defend anything about WMDs. Once again, what happened 10 years ago is no justification for misleading the public today. After all, this was going to be the most transparent administration in history, which may be as big as any lie told. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PAMFAM10 Posted May 31, 2014 Report Share Posted May 31, 2014 No Nash you don't get it Bush was Commander In chief I don't care if the dems or a group of elfs agreed only the Commander In Chief can declare wars. He stood in front of the American people and told them saddam had weapons of mass destruction. Which killed tens of thousands innocent lives. But of course obama lie is way bigger huh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PAMFAM10 Posted May 31, 2014 Report Share Posted May 31, 2014 PamFAm- Weapons of mass destruction was voted on by everyone (including the Democrats who are so much "smarter" than everyone else. Hillary voted for the war. So no, I needn't defend anything about WMDs. Once again, what happened 10 years ago is no justification for misleading the public today. After all, this was going to be the most transparent administration in history, which may be as big as any lie told. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PAMFAM10 Posted May 31, 2014 Report Share Posted May 31, 2014 PamFAm- Weapons of mass destruction was voted on by everyone (including the Democrats who are so much "smarter" than everyone else. Hillary voted for the war. So no, I needn't defend anything about WMDs. Once again, what happened 10 years ago is no justification for misleading the public today. After all, this was going to be the most transparent administration in history, which may be as big as any lie told. So you saying in 10 years all Obama lies should also be forgotten. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenash Posted May 31, 2014 Report Share Posted May 31, 2014 I am saying that it is more than wrong for the Chief Executive of this country to intentionally lie to the public and nothing that happened in the past justifies that. I asked this once and got no answer ( and I think I know why) but let me ask you: Regarding Benghazi, IRS Scandal, NSA spying scandal, Fast and Furious, the GSA gone wild scandal, to name a few of the most prominent. Has the truth to all of these issues come out? Or are these all phoney scandals that have been trumped up by the Republicans? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PAMFAM10 Posted May 31, 2014 Report Share Posted May 31, 2014 I am saying that it is more than wrong for the Chief Executive of this country to intentionally lie to the public and nothing that happened in the past justifies that. I asked this once and got no answer ( and I think I know why) but let me ask you: Regarding Benghazi, IRS Scandal, NSA spying scandal, Fast and Furious, the GSA gone wild scandal, to name a few of the most prominent. Has the truth to all of these issues come out? Or are these all phoney scandals that have been trumped up by the Republicans?You proved my point already thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenash Posted May 31, 2014 Report Share Posted May 31, 2014 And you answered my question even though you think you didn't Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TxHoops Posted May 31, 2014 Report Share Posted May 31, 2014 Nothing to see here. Not like Mr. Jarrett was sending his maid out to buy oxy's by the case like the esteemed Rush Limbaugh. That shepherd needed about 5 minutes to be completely forgiven by his morally righteous herd. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TxHoops Posted May 31, 2014 Report Share Posted May 31, 2014 BIll Gates and Steve Jobs. No college degrees. Much more success than most. Agreed. Also a couple of brilliant democrats. Good examples ;) Mr. Buddy Garrity 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenash Posted May 31, 2014 Report Share Posted May 31, 2014 Yep- party affiliation has nothing to do with success. Its more a matter of do you want to go get it yourself or do you prefer to let the govt sustain you and then complain about how unfair things are. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TxHoops Posted May 31, 2014 Report Share Posted May 31, 2014 Yes, I remember Gates and Jobs doing a lot of complaining about "doing it themselves." And warren buffet. Or while we are stereotyping, maybe those three are just too darn intelligent to be republicans? Mr. Buddy Garrity 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.