mat Posted May 24, 2014 Report Share Posted May 24, 2014 Here's a topic most may agree on, home invasions. Enough is enough when yon you can't sit safely in your own home. There needs to be a mandatory minimum 20 years without parole. The sentence should increase significantly if elderly or children are involved. the same could be said about car jackings This isn't intended to start a home protection debate either but I'm sure it will anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PAMFAM10 Posted May 24, 2014 Report Share Posted May 24, 2014 Yes people now a days getting 1 year sentence 2years probation if that. Home invasion should be 5-10 armed invasion 15 minimum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenash Posted May 24, 2014 Report Share Posted May 24, 2014 I know the latest home invasion victim very well Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westend1 Posted May 24, 2014 Report Share Posted May 24, 2014 Interesting topic. Should a 17 year old kid, who breaks in to steal your tv, spend 20 years in prison? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PAMFAM10 Posted May 24, 2014 Report Share Posted May 24, 2014 That's the only reason I said 5-10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ty Cobb Posted May 24, 2014 Report Share Posted May 24, 2014 Interesting topic. Should a 17 year old kid, who breaks in to steal your tv, spend 20 years in prison? Yes, the piece of crap should be in jail for as long as possible. Breaking into someone's house is a crime. Stealing is a crime. Only harsh punishment will deter it from happening again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PAMFAM10 Posted May 24, 2014 Report Share Posted May 24, 2014 20 years if far to long for a 17 year old who made a very bad decision. Some people murder and only get 20. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenash Posted May 24, 2014 Report Share Posted May 24, 2014 Does that mean the 17 year old should get less or should the murdered get more? If a 17 year old should get less, what about a 19 year old or a 22 year old? If a 17 year old and a 35 year old ( with very similar behavior backgrounds) commit a crime together, does the older one deserve more punishment? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tvc184 Posted May 24, 2014 Report Share Posted May 24, 2014 Interesting topic. Should a 17 year old kid, who breaks in to steal your tv, spend 20 years in prison? Not if it is his first rodeo but for a repeat offender, sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baddog Posted May 24, 2014 Report Share Posted May 24, 2014 That's what is wrong with the judicial system anyway......too many levels of guilt for the same crime. I think 20 years is better than the alternative to breaking into my house. That could warrant the death penalty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tvc184 Posted May 24, 2014 Report Share Posted May 24, 2014 That's what is wrong with the judicial system anyway......too many levels of guilt for the same crime. I think 20 years is better than the alternative to breaking into my house. That could warrant the death penalty. So you think a 17 year old with no record should get the same sentence as a guy that have been in prison three times previous? Mr. Buddy Garrity 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baddog Posted May 24, 2014 Report Share Posted May 24, 2014 The sentence should be set in stone. 17 year olds get 10 years, 19 year olds get 12, 20-25 year olds get 15......etc.The extenuating circumstances are for the high priced lawyers to argue. The three time loser should not have had the opportunity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PAMFAM10 Posted May 24, 2014 Report Share Posted May 24, 2014 Not if it is his first rodeo but for a repeat offender, sure. I agree a 17 year old with no record shouldn't get 20 years Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PAMFAM10 Posted May 24, 2014 Report Share Posted May 24, 2014 Does that mean the 17 year old should get less or should the murdered get more? If a 17 year old should get less, what about a 19 year old or a 22 year old? If a 17 year old and a 35 year old ( with very similar behavior backgrounds) commit a crime together, does the older one deserve more punishment? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mat Posted May 25, 2014 Author Report Share Posted May 25, 2014 There's a difference between a home invasion and breaking and entering. Punks these days are coming through the front door and beating the crap out of the elderly. 20 years minimum Ty Cobb 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
77 Posted May 25, 2014 Report Share Posted May 25, 2014 Dont think this DOJ would go for it it may target people he likes more than others beside they are letting folks like this out of prison! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tvc184 Posted May 25, 2014 Report Share Posted May 25, 2014 Dont think this DOJ would go for it it may target people he likes more than others beside they are letting folks like this out of prison! The DOJ has nothing to do with burglaries or robberies (except maybe carjackings and bank robberies). Mr. Buddy Garrity 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westend1 Posted May 25, 2014 Report Share Posted May 25, 2014 There's a difference between a home invasion and breaking and entering. Punks these days are coming through the front door and beating the crap out of the elderly. 20 years minimumWhat is the difference? Do you think he knew people were home? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mat Posted May 25, 2014 Author Report Share Posted May 25, 2014 The recent pattern is to follow the elderly home, bust in, beat them, then rob them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PAMFAM10 Posted May 26, 2014 Report Share Posted May 26, 2014 The recent pattern is to follow the elderly home, bust in, beat them, then rob them.well that's more than invasion Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenash Posted May 26, 2014 Report Share Posted May 26, 2014 Pamfam- Do you know of home invasion circumstances where someone simply wanted to break into a home and not steal anything or hurt anyone? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PAMFAM10 Posted May 26, 2014 Report Share Posted May 26, 2014 Stealing and hurting is to different things. I'm assuming most burglars prefer you not be home. Mr. Buddy Garrity 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenash Posted May 26, 2014 Report Share Posted May 26, 2014 I was thinking that breaking into someones home, regardless of intent, is a big no-no and deserves a punishment sufficient to prevent an instant replay. But that's just me. I know how important it is to show compassion for those folks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
new tobie Posted May 26, 2014 Report Share Posted May 26, 2014 I was thinking that breaking into someones home, regardless of intent, is a big no-no and deserves a punishment sufficient to prevent an instant replay. But that's just me. I know how important it is to show compassion for those folks. I know how important it is to show compassion for those folks........ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
new tobie Posted May 26, 2014 Report Share Posted May 26, 2014 Was this to harsh....http://www.panews.com/sportsbobwest/x681468585/Dealing-with-son-s-prison-sentence-only-way-I-know?zc_p=0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.