adminbaberuth Posted May 30, 2014 Report Share Posted May 30, 2014 http://www.kogt.com/kogt_sports.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
braves24 Posted May 30, 2014 Report Share Posted May 30, 2014 No Brayden Griffin? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
td Posted May 30, 2014 Report Share Posted May 30, 2014 I noticed that myself! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rake1 Posted May 30, 2014 Report Share Posted May 30, 2014 Misprint.Rake1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rake1 Posted May 30, 2014 Report Share Posted May 30, 2014 Check it again, it's been corrected. Pitcher of the Year-Brayden Griffin-SilsbeeRake1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AggiesAreWe Posted May 30, 2014 Report Share Posted May 30, 2014 Congrats to all these players!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AggiesAreWe Posted May 30, 2014 Report Share Posted May 30, 2014 So playoff teams WO-S and Hamshire-Fannett get 4 players each on all-district but Hardin-Jefferson places 6 on all district without making playoffs. Interesting...... Also noticed a player not on the all district list but was named BE Super Gold. :rolleyes: Gladtobehere and STiger85 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STiger85 Posted May 30, 2014 Report Share Posted May 30, 2014 Misprint. Rake1 Yeah, Rake 1 I see several misprints????? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rake1 Posted May 30, 2014 Report Share Posted May 30, 2014 Yeah, Rake 1 I see several misprints????? All I was referring to was the accidental omission of the Pitcher of the Year and Brayden Griffin. Rake1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STiger85 Posted May 30, 2014 Report Share Posted May 30, 2014 All I was referring to was the accidental omission of the Pitcher of the Year and Brayden Griffin. Rake1 I know Rake 1, I was referring to the list itself!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
td Posted May 30, 2014 Report Share Posted May 30, 2014 Where has it been corrected? I'm looking on KOGT site and I don't see the change. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
td Posted May 30, 2014 Report Share Posted May 30, 2014 Just changed or corrected for me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chukslegacy Posted May 30, 2014 Report Share Posted May 30, 2014 No doubt BC and Silsbee should dominate the list but I question the legitimacy of other picks. This response has no bearing on my own kids that play. This should be based on performance and nothing else! When a coach starts factoring in other components other than a kids potential, he is doing a disservice and injustice to the kids who truly deserve the recognition. JMO but this list each year looses its credibility. col1324, twilyms, chukslegacy and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chukslegacy Posted May 30, 2014 Report Share Posted May 30, 2014 Performance not potential. Kids can have potential and not perform. My badd BADSANTA 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adminbaberuth Posted May 30, 2014 Author Report Share Posted May 30, 2014 Hope not mistaken but these picks were on performance in 12 District games. That's about 30-35 AB's and maybe 30 -35 innings of pitching. Critter 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chasmack Posted May 30, 2014 Report Share Posted May 30, 2014 No doubt BC and Silsbee should dominate the list but I question the legitimacy of other picks. This response has no bearing on my own kids that play. This should be based on performance and nothing else! When a coach starts factoring in other components other than a kids potential, he is doing a disservice and injustice to the kids who truly deserve the recognition. JMO but this list each year looses its credibility. Absolutely agree! No dog in the hunt here either. I feel sorry for the players who legitimately deserve the All-District awards, but the honor of being put on these teams was watered down by some of these picks. These selections bring into question; Is it about your Fielding%, BA, OPS, ...etc. or something else? It was the same way with the football All-District selections. Now I have a question and I'm just trying to figure out the selection process....Why do you have 3 1st Team pitchers and only 2 2nd Team? Also why 5 1st Team OF and only 3 2nd Team OF? This is a legitimate question, not trying to be a smart a**. Does it go by BA then Fielding% for Positional Players, maybe with slugging%, OPS and OB% in the mix to break any ties? Just curious. Also congrats to the teams from 21-3A who made the playoffs and to Silsbee who went up against a really tough College Station team! Also, it was refreshing to see HF's Coach Morris bring some passion back to that program. twilyms 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rake1 Posted May 30, 2014 Report Share Posted May 30, 2014 Absolutely agree! No dog in the hunt here either. I feel sorry for the players who legitimately deserve the All-District awards, but the honor of being put on these teams was watered down by some of these picks. These selections bring into question; Is it about your Fielding%, BA, OPS, ...etc. or something else? It was the same way with the football All-District selections. Now I have a question and I'm just trying to figure out the selection process....Why do you have 3 1st Team pitchers and only 2 2nd Team? Also why 5 1st Team OF and only 3 2nd Team OF? This is a legitimate question, not trying to be a smart a**. Does it go by BA then Fielding% for Positional Players, maybe with slugging%, OPS and OB% in the mix to break any ties? Just curious. Also congrats to the teams from 21-3A who made the playoffs and to Silsbee who went up against a really tough College Station team! Also, it was refreshing to see HF's Coach Morris bring some passion back to that program.Up front legitimate question right here. How does "the pick" water down the team? I believe too many picks water down a team but not a "pick" itself. The 21-3A team is WAY LESS WATERED DOWN THAN 20-4A, just look at the total number of players and compare. Just trying to understandyour point.Also another thing to think about is how the "Superlatives" or "MVP's" change the outcome ofthe team. Just for example, if you had a catcher as overall MVP, another catcher as OffensiveMVP, then your 1st team catcher would essentially be the 3rd best catcher in the district. Thisexample sometimes explains how the final team looks. Just a thought to consider, not sayingit's right or wrong.Rake1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chasmack Posted May 30, 2014 Report Share Posted May 30, 2014 Up front legitimate question right here. How does "the pick" water down the team? I believe too many picks water down a team but not a "pick" itself. The 21-3A team is WAY LESS WATERED DOWN THAN 20-4A, just look at the total number of players and compare. Just trying to understand your point. Also another thing to think about is how the "Superlatives" or "MVP's" change the outcome of the team. Just for example, if you had a catcher as overall MVP, another catcher as Offensive MVP, then your 1st team catcher would essentially be the 3rd best catcher in the district. This example sometimes explains how the final team looks. Just a thought to consider, not saying it's right or wrong. Rake1 So the "Superlatives" picks stand alone and those players can not be picked for 1st Team? I guess I'm from the school of thought that you pick the best starting team which include 3-4 Pitchers (Starter, middle reliever, closer) and a starting line-up with a DH. That would be the 1st team. You would do the same for 2nd team with the 2nd best talent at those positions. This would be the team that ,in theory, you would place on the field to play another District in a game. From the 1st team, you would then pick your MVP's or "Superlatives". I think IMO that this would give you your best All-District selections. Maybe there are other factors involved that I'm no aware of and makes this a mute point. Is anybody "in the know" on how these picks are made? Is it a bartering system as in, "I'll give you this pick if you give me this one"? Just curious, or is this something that needs to be dropped and left alone? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twilyms Posted May 30, 2014 Report Share Posted May 30, 2014 I have been dealing with All-District teams in both softball and baseball for the last seven years. As is the case with this team, the superlatives usually reward the most deserving players. Once past that point, not so much. The high school coaches have people that they have to please and keep happy. As will be the case forever, politics and pressure determine a lot of this. I know making this team is important to the kids, but that is just the way it is. The frustrating part is that the name on the back of the shirt in high school ball is sometimes more important than performance on the field, which only does the player injustice once they move on. Congratulations to the kids who made it. It is a nice honor. If you feel you should have made it and you didn't, next year take it out on the coaches that didn't vote for you and make them look bad. col1324 and chukslegacy 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rake1 Posted May 30, 2014 Report Share Posted May 30, 2014 So the "Superlatives" picks stand alone and those players can not be picked for 1st Team? I guess I'm from the school of thought that you pick the best starting team which include 3-4 Pitchers (Starter, middle reliever, closer) and a starting line-up with a DH. That would be the 1st team. You would do the same for 2nd team with the 2nd best talent at those positions. This would be the team that ,in theory, you would place on the field to play another District in a game. From the 1st team, you would then pick your MVP's or "Superlatives". I think IMO that this would give you your best All-District selections. Maybe there are other factors involved that I'm no aware of and makes this a mute point. Is anybody "in the know" on how these picks are made? Is it a bartering system as in, "I'll give you this pick if you give me this one"? Just curious, or is this something that needs to be dropped and left alone?I personally haven't seen a team picked where the Superlative players were also included on the1st team. I don't claim to have seen them all either.As far as the "bartering" comment goes, I'll leave that to the conspiracy theorists. Peoplewill form their own opinion regardless of the outcome.Rake1 Critter 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chukslegacy Posted May 30, 2014 Report Share Posted May 30, 2014 Boog great post. Back n the day 1st team didn't consist of the number of picks today and this is something that probably the coaches have changed, to try and keep in good standings with those that can have a direct impact on their job. People can bring up the stats all they want when supporting the decision, but if the coach has a personal reason for seeing a kid be recognized those numbers can be altered. There is all different ways to make one look better than what they are.JMO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adminbaberuth Posted May 30, 2014 Author Report Share Posted May 30, 2014 You the coach, make a lineup from 21-3A. Starting P: Catcher: 1B: 2B: SS: 3B: OF: OF: OF: DH: TEXASLH07 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rake1 Posted May 30, 2014 Report Share Posted May 30, 2014 Boog great post. Back n the day 1st team didn't consist of the number of picks today and this is something that probably the coaches have changed, to try and keep in good standings with those that can have a direct impact on their job. People can bring up the stats all they want when supporting the decision, but if the coach has a personal reason for seeing a kid be recognized those numbers can be altered. There is all different ways to make one look better than what they are.JMOSome schools stats are more accessible than others. When your numbers are out there for allthe world to see it's awfully hard to argue with that. Besides that most coaches score thegames alike for the most part. A discrepancy here or there is going to happen but over thecourse of 80-100 at bats it would take a bunch of "cooking the books" to truly change anaverage that much. Sounds a little more like some conspiracy theory stuff.....Rake1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chukslegacy Posted May 30, 2014 Report Share Posted May 30, 2014 Conspiracy Theory? Lol. I don't have time for that. Just stating my opinion, being brought up by a coach and later an administrator I understand what pressures a coach has to deal with. You can choose to do the right thing or choose to do the easy thing. Neither way is going to be popular by those it effects. It goes on everywhere! One4All 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chukslegacy Posted May 30, 2014 Report Share Posted May 30, 2014 :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.