Saddam's WMD Confirmed!!

[Big girl]

No, because you didn't post the FULL link......

Second, you are clainmin that chemical weapons are not WMD.....and they are!

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/weapons+of+mass+destruction

http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/917314/weapon-of-mass-destruction-WMD

http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/weapon-of-mass-destruction

Next

I posted the article andv the guys explanation, that is besides the point. There were not any weapons of mass destruction found in iraq. To say the media covered it up is asinine.

[Big girl]

I am going back to bed, I need to heal.

[AggiesAreWe]

ha ha sarcasm. I have a galaxy note. How much better can it get.

 

That's a good phone.

 

Then it must be operator problems which does surprise me since the operator is so highly educated. ;) :rolleyes:

[thetragichippy]

This Leading GOP Congressional Candidate Insists We Found Saddam's WMD . Google this article.

 

I posted the article andv the guys explanation, that is besides the point. There were not any weapons of mass destruction found in iraq. To say the media covered it up is asinine.

 

http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=15918

[Big girl]

There were not any wmd, but if it makes you feel better so be it.

[LumRaiderFan]

There were not any wmd, but if it makes you feel better so be it.

If he didn't have WMDs, how did he manage to kill all the Kurdish?

I doubt you have ever even heard of this by try to muster an answer.

[smitty]

There were not any wmd, but if it makes you feel better so be it.

So, you are saying that chemical weapons are not WMD?   

[Big girl]

So, you are saying that chemical weapons are not WMD?

did you read the article?

[Big girl]

If he didn't have WMDs, how did he manage to kill all the Kurdish?

I doubt you have ever even heard of this by try to muster an answer.

why didnt he use them against us when we invaded. Karl rove , among others, say they did not find wmd

[thetragichippy]

Pointless, she reads one article and claims it as fact. I've posted the definition of WMD's from 3 different sites to prove they a say the same thing and all include chemical weapons.

[westend1]

Under that defintion, wouldn't an AK qualify as a WMD?

[thetragichippy]

Under that defintion, wouldn't an AK qualify as a WMD?

 

I personally don't think so. If you read all the definitions that are out there, they all say chemical, biological or radioactive weapon capable of causing widespread death and destruction or at least imply that.

 

Now, a person can read into it what they want, but what all the definitions do have in common is the mention of chemical weapons as WMD.

[Big girl]

Would you consider mustard gas a weapon of mass destruction? It is a chemical weapon.

[stevenash]

Big Girl- just for the record, are you suggesting that chemical weapons are NOT weapons of mass destruction?

[thetragichippy]

Would you consider mustard gas a weapon of mass destruction? It is a chemical weapon.

 

YES

 

mustard gas - a toxic war gas with sulfide based compounds that raises blisters and attacks the eyes and lungs; there is no known antidote

 

Because it is a chemical weapon......

 

Educate yourself:

 

http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/108951/chemical-weapon/274179/Weapons-of-mass-destruction

 

http://science.howstuffworks.com/mustard-gas1.htm

[Mr. Buddy Garrity]

YES

 

mustard gas - a toxic war gas with sulfide based compounds that raises blisters and attacks the eyes and lungs; there is no known antidote

 

Because it is a chemical weapon......

 

Educate yourself:

 

http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/108951/chemical-weapon/274179/Weapons-of-mass-destruction

 

http://science.howstuffworks.com/mustard-gas1.htm

I learned all about that crap in Korea, seen the pictures too, ouch.

[baddog]

Would you consider mustard gas a weapon of mass destruction? It is a chemical weapon.

I have a hard time digesting the fact that people like you actually exist. It seems that natural selection should have intervened somewhere. Do I need to define natural selection?

[smitty]

I have a hard time digesting the fact that people like you actually exist. It seems that natural selection should have intervened somewhere. Do I need to define natural selection?

Come on, baddog, these are the "low information voters" that obama and the democrats rely on.  It's proven here everyday!  

[thetragichippy]

I learned all about that crap in Korea, seen the pictures too, ouch.

 

That would be a horrible way to go.

[Big girl]

I have a hard time digesting the fact that people like you actually exist. It seems that natural selection should have intervened somewhere. Do I need to define natural selection?

what is your definition of MASS destruction?

[LumRaiderFan]

Don't bother Baddog...waste of time.

[Big girl]

Can mustard gas cause buildings and mountains to crumble?

[Mr. Buddy Garrity]

Can mustard gas cause buildings and mountains to crumble?

you do know it can be attached to artillery right?

[Mr. Buddy Garrity]

That would be a horrible way to go.

yep!

[stevenash]

Big Girl- You have to understand that some people consider anything that can kill lots of people in a relatively short time as more harmful than something that can make a mountain crumble.