Big girl Posted June 25, 2014 Report Posted June 25, 2014 No, because you didn't post the FULL link...... Second, you are clainmin that chemical weapons are not WMD.....and they are!http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/weapons+of+mass+destructionhttp://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/917314/weapon-of-mass-destruction-WMDhttp://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/weapon-of-mass-destruction Next I posted the article andv the guys explanation, that is besides the point. There were not any weapons of mass destruction found in iraq. To say the media covered it up is asinine. Quote
Big girl Posted June 25, 2014 Report Posted June 25, 2014 I am going back to bed, I need to heal. Quote
AggiesAreWe Posted June 25, 2014 Report Posted June 25, 2014 ha ha sarcasm. I have a galaxy note. How much better can it get. That's a good phone. Then it must be operator problems which does surprise me since the operator is so highly educated. ;) :rolleyes: thetragichippy and PN-G bamatex 2 Quote
thetragichippy Posted June 25, 2014 Report Posted June 25, 2014 This Leading GOP Congressional Candidate Insists We Found Saddam's WMD . Google this article. I posted the article andv the guys explanation, that is besides the point. There were not any weapons of mass destruction found in iraq. To say the media covered it up is asinine. http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=15918 Quote
Big girl Posted June 26, 2014 Report Posted June 26, 2014 There were not any wmd, but if it makes you feel better so be it. Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted June 26, 2014 Report Posted June 26, 2014 There were not any wmd, but if it makes you feel better so be it. If he didn't have WMDs, how did he manage to kill all the Kurdish? I doubt you have ever even heard of this by try to muster an answer. Quote
smitty Posted June 26, 2014 Author Report Posted June 26, 2014 There were not any wmd, but if it makes you feel better so be it. So, you are saying that chemical weapons are not WMD? Quote
Big girl Posted June 26, 2014 Report Posted June 26, 2014 So, you are saying that chemical weapons are not WMD? did you read the article? Quote
Big girl Posted June 26, 2014 Report Posted June 26, 2014 If he didn't have WMDs, how did he manage to kill all the Kurdish? I doubt you have ever even heard of this by try to muster an answer. why didnt he use them against us when we invaded. Karl rove , among others, say they did not find wmd Quote
thetragichippy Posted June 26, 2014 Report Posted June 26, 2014 Pointless, she reads one article and claims it as fact. I've posted the definition of WMD's from 3 different sites to prove they a say the same thing and all include chemical weapons. Quote
westend1 Posted June 26, 2014 Report Posted June 26, 2014 Under that defintion, wouldn't an AK qualify as a WMD? Quote
thetragichippy Posted June 26, 2014 Report Posted June 26, 2014 Under that defintion, wouldn't an AK qualify as a WMD? I personally don't think so. If you read all the definitions that are out there, they all say chemical, biological or radioactive weapon capable of causing widespread death and destruction or at least imply that. Now, a person can read into it what they want, but what all the definitions do have in common is the mention of chemical weapons as WMD. Quote
Big girl Posted June 27, 2014 Report Posted June 27, 2014 Would you consider mustard gas a weapon of mass destruction? It is a chemical weapon. Quote
stevenash Posted June 27, 2014 Report Posted June 27, 2014 Big Girl- just for the record, are you suggesting that chemical weapons are NOT weapons of mass destruction? Quote
thetragichippy Posted June 27, 2014 Report Posted June 27, 2014 Would you consider mustard gas a weapon of mass destruction? It is a chemical weapon. YES mustard gas - a toxic war gas with sulfide based compounds that raises blisters and attacks the eyes and lungs; there is no known antidote Because it is a chemical weapon...... Educate yourself: http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/108951/chemical-weapon/274179/Weapons-of-mass-destruction http://science.howstuffworks.com/mustard-gas1.htm Quote
Mr. Buddy Garrity Posted June 27, 2014 Report Posted June 27, 2014 YES mustard gas - a toxic war gas with sulfide based compounds that raises blisters and attacks the eyes and lungs; there is no known antidote Because it is a chemical weapon...... Educate yourself: http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/108951/chemical-weapon/274179/Weapons-of-mass-destruction http://science.howstuffworks.com/mustard-gas1.htm I learned all about that crap in Korea, seen the pictures too, ouch. Quote
baddog Posted June 27, 2014 Report Posted June 27, 2014 Would you consider mustard gas a weapon of mass destruction? It is a chemical weapon. I have a hard time digesting the fact that people like you actually exist. It seems that natural selection should have intervened somewhere. Do I need to define natural selection? Quote
smitty Posted June 27, 2014 Author Report Posted June 27, 2014 I have a hard time digesting the fact that people like you actually exist. It seems that natural selection should have intervened somewhere. Do I need to define natural selection? Come on, baddog, these are the "low information voters" that obama and the democrats rely on. It's proven here everyday! Quote
thetragichippy Posted June 27, 2014 Report Posted June 27, 2014 I learned all about that crap in Korea, seen the pictures too, ouch. That would be a horrible way to go. Mr. Buddy Garrity 1 Quote
Big girl Posted June 28, 2014 Report Posted June 28, 2014 I have a hard time digesting the fact that people like you actually exist. It seems that natural selection should have intervened somewhere. Do I need to define natural selection? what is your definition of MASS destruction? Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted June 28, 2014 Report Posted June 28, 2014 Don't bother Baddog...waste of time. Quote
Big girl Posted June 28, 2014 Report Posted June 28, 2014 Can mustard gas cause buildings and mountains to crumble? Quote
Mr. Buddy Garrity Posted June 28, 2014 Report Posted June 28, 2014 Can mustard gas cause buildings and mountains to crumble? you do know it can be attached to artillery right? PN-G bamatex and thetragichippy 2 Quote
Mr. Buddy Garrity Posted June 28, 2014 Report Posted June 28, 2014 That would be a horrible way to go.yep! Quote
stevenash Posted June 28, 2014 Report Posted June 28, 2014 Big Girl- You have to understand that some people consider anything that can kill lots of people in a relatively short time as more harmful than something that can make a mountain crumble. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.