baddog Posted June 28, 2014 Report Share Posted June 28, 2014 what is your definition of MASS destruction? Hippy already defined it for you. You argue simply for the sake of argument. You bore me. Grow up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smitty Posted June 28, 2014 Author Report Share Posted June 28, 2014 Can mustard gas cause buildings and mountains to crumble? Incredible! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PAMFAM10 Posted June 30, 2014 Report Share Posted June 30, 2014 Incredible! We're talking gas, what about the mushroom clouds. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baddog Posted June 30, 2014 Report Share Posted June 30, 2014 We're talking gas, what about the mushroom clouds. What about 'em? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted June 30, 2014 Report Share Posted June 30, 2014 Some people consider weapons of madd destruction as weapons that that can destroy buildings/topple mountains.Look it up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thetragichippy Posted June 30, 2014 Report Share Posted June 30, 2014 Some people consider weapons of madd destruction as weapons that that can destroy buildings/topple mountains.Look it up. When you look it up, don't' use Webster, Britannica, Wiki or any of the other reputable site because it does not agree with her. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenash Posted June 30, 2014 Report Share Posted June 30, 2014 Sorry, but the main concern is for the living as opposed to buildings and mountains. Give it up. You arent going to change it. The weapons were found and all you can do is fool around with definitions. This is as bad as stating that the 17 trillion dollar debt does not exist. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baddog Posted June 30, 2014 Report Share Posted June 30, 2014 There are conventional weapons that can topple mountains such as the daisy cutter or the MOAB. They are not nuclear, biological, or chemical in nature. Videos on YouTube. Look them up. Learn something and quit asking questions with obvious answers. The proliferation of WMDs could mean the end of the world as we know it and rogue nations have to be prevented from possessing them. This is why Korea and Iran are scary and to be dealt with. So was/is Iraq. If you can't understand that, then there is simply no hope for you. thetragichippy and PN-G bamatex 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted June 30, 2014 Report Share Posted June 30, 2014 It took them 12 yrs to find those weapons? You guys are die hard fox news fans and they admit wmd were not found. Explain that please. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted June 30, 2014 Report Share Posted June 30, 2014 And even they admit (fox news), which is a miracle in itself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baddog Posted June 30, 2014 Report Share Posted June 30, 2014 It took them 12 yrs to find those weapons? You guys are die hard fox news fans and they admit wmd were not found. Explain that please. Only you could contradict your own post. SMH WMD proliferation has been a concern of all presidents since the development of Nuclear weapons.......well before Fox was even a tv channel. Of course you would not know that, but I bet here comes another question. I'm bored now so I must leave. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted July 1, 2014 Report Share Posted July 1, 2014 Yeah whatever. Why Is even fox news denying the claims of wmd being found in iraq Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted July 1, 2014 Report Share Posted July 1, 2014 Some hosts anyway Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PAMFAM10 Posted July 1, 2014 Report Share Posted July 1, 2014 If you guys wanna believe bush in the crew was talking about gas go ahead but it's clear bush was talking nuclear bombs. Listen to any speech from him dick or rice and tell me what kind of weapon bush was referring too. WMDS or WMDS but let's not act like haha bush was right. It's like me claiming somebody have a pterodactyl and I find a misquote. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted July 1, 2014 Report Share Posted July 1, 2014 I agree wholeheartedly. A lot of countries have mustard gas. PAMFAM10 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PAMFAM10 Posted July 1, 2014 Report Share Posted July 1, 2014 ?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thetragichippy Posted July 1, 2014 Report Share Posted July 1, 2014 If you guys wanna believe bush in the crew was talking about gas go ahead but it's clear bush was talking nuclear bombs. Listen to any speech from him dick or rice and tell me what kind of weapon bush was referring too. WMDS or WMDS but let's not act like haha bush was right. It's like me claiming somebody have a pterodactyl and I find a misquote. 09/18/2002, Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense (before Congress) "We do know that the Iraqi regime has chemical and biological weapons. His regime has amassed large, clandestine stockpiles of chemical weapons -- including VX, sarin, cyclosarin and mustard gas. ... His regime has amassed large, clandestine stockpiles of biological weapons—including anthrax and botulism toxin, and possibly smallpox." (presentation to Congress) 10/7/2002, George W. Bush, President "The Iraqi regime . . . possesses and produces chemical and biological weapons. It is seeking nuclear weapons. We know that the regime has produced thousands of tons of chemical agents, including mustard gas, sarin nerve gas, VX nerve gas." The War started in 2003........so, they defined WMD's before they went in....... http://zfacts.com/iraq-war-quotes PAMFAM10 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PAMFAM10 Posted July 1, 2014 Report Share Posted July 1, 2014 If you guys wanna believe bush in the crew was talking about gas go ahead but it's clear bush was talking nuclear bombs. Listen to any speech from him dick or rice and tell me what kind of weapon bush was referring too. WMDS or WMDS but let's not act like haha bush was right. It's like me claiming somebody have a pterodactyl and I find a misquote. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baddog Posted July 1, 2014 Report Share Posted July 1, 2014 Yeah whatever. Why Is even fox news denying the claims of wmd being found in iraq Whatever is my favorite response. It shows a lack of ammo. And there is the question I predicted. If you can't stand Fox news, why do you watch it? You know in your heart that he had WMDs. You just keep playing this question and answer game because you have nothing else. Thank God we kept him from obtaining nukes. Do you think we should allow Iran to develop nukes? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenash Posted July 1, 2014 Report Share Posted July 1, 2014 Give her some time. Thinkprogress.org may not have an answer to your question thus forcing her to seek alternative "research". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted July 1, 2014 Report Share Posted July 1, 2014 Do they have nuclear weapons? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted July 1, 2014 Report Share Posted July 1, 2014 Those who still get the Iraq WMD story wrong | MSNBC www.msnbc.com/.../those-who-still-get-t... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenash Posted July 1, 2014 Report Share Posted July 1, 2014 You make fun of/belittle Fox and then post something from MSNBC. Ha Ha Ha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted July 1, 2014 Report Share Posted July 1, 2014 R-Texas) insist that Saddam Hussein “had weapons of mass destruction,†and may have moved the stockpiles “over into Syria.†I immediately double-checked the date, and sure enough, the comments came yesterday. To clarify, those making remarks like these in August 2003 were foolish. For anyone, least of all an elected member of Congress, to repeat such things out loud in August 2013 suggests Louie Gohmert may, in fact, be made of wood. Alas, he’s not alone. Rep. Lee Terry (R-Neb.) said on Thursday that he is against military intervention in Syria, even though his “gut feeling†is that the Syrian government now possesses chemical weapons that came from fallen Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein. Terry, who has served in the House since 1999, supported the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003. In an interview on Thursday with Omaha radio host Tom Becka, Terry said Syria was a completely different situation. “The theory then and the evidence was that Iraq was an enemy of the United States and had direct plans in either support of al Qaeda and/or with other weapons that we found out weren’t there – which I still think they were moved to Syria,†said Terry. “And it wouldn’t surprise me if some of the chemical weapons that have been used by Syria actually came from Iraq.†The Nebraska Republican added, “[W]e all we know that Iraq had … chemical and biological weapons and then they weren’t there.†You’ve got to be kidding me. It’s painful to realize that there are still members of Congress who are confused about the basics, even now, a decade later. But in case Reps. Terry and Gohmert see this, let’s spell it out: Iraq’s WMD stockpiles didn’t exist. There’s no reason to believe the weapons were moved to Syria since, once again, they didn’t exist. Explore: ell even fox news is saying there were not any wmd. The story from the link above. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted July 1, 2014 Report Share Posted July 1, 2014 The story is from the link above, even fox news says wmd were not found. Isnt that something? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.