EnlightenedChosenOne Posted July 6, 2014 Report Share Posted July 6, 2014 According to the great former teabagger intellectuals Stevenash And Smitty, I am a bleeding heart liberal, communist AND socialist. I support the following political positions: - I support lower taxes and less regulation - I support the repeal of Obamacare - I support guns rights - I support freedom of speech According to the "How To Internet Debatez Vol. 2 Teabagger Special Edition" manual, Stevenash and Smitty are also bleeding heart liberals since they continuously post 20 topics a day expressing support of the same positions as myself. Stevenash and Smitty, what finally made you switch from being a teabagger to a COMMUNIST and SOCIALIST? Mr. Buddy Garrity and Big girl 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smitty Posted July 6, 2014 Report Share Posted July 6, 2014 According to the great former teabagger intellectuals Stevenash And Smitty, I am a bleeding heart liberal, communist AND socialist. I support the following political positions: - I support lower taxes and less regulation - I support the repeal of Obamacare - I support guns rights - I support freedom of speech According to the "How To Internet Debatez Vol. 2 Teabagger Special Edition" manual, Stevenash and Smitty are also bleeding heart liberals since they continuously post 20 topics a day expressing support of the same positions as myself. Stevenash and Smitty, what finally made you switch from being a teabagger to a COMMUNIST and SOCIALIST? If you are a Constitutionalists, then welcome! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenash Posted July 6, 2014 Report Share Posted July 6, 2014 Am glad you have made your position clear- you obviously agree with my contention that the President has done a very poor job. When u can document my labeling you as a socialist or communist, I will happily respond to that allegation. Just spewing words doesnt make them accurate. Very similar to " if you like your doctor, you can keep him", " I will have the most transparent administration in history". " I will build a 21st Century VA'', Benghazi was the result of a video", " At the end of my first term, the debt will be halved" and, of course " Boom Roasted"' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EnlightenedChosenOne Posted July 7, 2014 Author Report Share Posted July 7, 2014 You support the positions I listed in the original post. Teabaggers here call me a liberal, communist AND socialist. Therefore according to the teabagger debate logicz Smitty and yourself are communists and socialists. Now answer the question. Why did you flip flop? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smitty Posted July 7, 2014 Report Share Posted July 7, 2014 You support the positions I listed in the original post. Teabaggers here call me a liberal, communist AND socialist. Therefore according to the teabagger debate logicz Smitty and yourself are communists and socialists. Now answer the question. Why did you flip flop? I think I welcomed you! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LumRaiderFan Posted July 7, 2014 Report Share Posted July 7, 2014 Dumb thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenash Posted July 7, 2014 Report Share Posted July 7, 2014 EOC logic hard for we common folk to grasp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted July 7, 2014 Report Share Posted July 7, 2014 What I cant figure out is why people want to do away with the EPA, before the EPA was formed a river caught on fire 13 times because it was so polluted. Google it. West texas was blown off of the map because of less regulation. I definitely dont want to go to sleep worrying about lakes.catching on fire. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EnlightenedChosenOne Posted July 7, 2014 Author Report Share Posted July 7, 2014 ObviouslyEOC logic hard for we common folk to grasp Mr. Buddy Garrity 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TROJANSWIN Posted July 7, 2014 Report Share Posted July 7, 2014 What I cant figure out is why people want to do away with the EPA, before the EPA was formed a river caught on fire 13 times because it was so polluted. Google it. West texas was blown off of the map because of less regulation. I definitely dont want to go to sleep worrying about lakes.catching on fire. West was not blown off the map because of less regulation! The fertilizer plant in West blew up because it had explosive chemicals in it, had an accident, and blew up. Since you are an Aggie, from the Texas Agricultural and Mechanical University,I would like to think that you know a little bit about fertilizers. Ammonium Nitrate (a kind of fertilizer) when mixed with various fuel oils, such as diesel, creates a substance whose name gets shortened into TNT. Think back to before Bush was president and you were watching cartoons on TV. What did cartoon characters do with TNT? This is also the mixture that was used in Oklahoma City to blow up the federal building there. Many common chemicals can be explosive if mixed together. I doubt you learned about fertilizer, but I would think you took some sort of chemistry class at some point. And before you rattle on about the EPA could have somehow solved this problem, do you know that barns catch on fire regularly because people store hay with too much moisture left in it inside the barn? As the fermentation process of the grass happens, it creates enough heat to cause the grass to spontaneously combust, and starts a fire. Hard for the EPA to keep all that smoke out of the air when the grass is burning. Besides, they are still trying to figure out how to tax cows for burping, because the millions of bison that once roamed our country were more environmentally friendly than the newer models of cows that we make in factories in the U.S. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted July 7, 2014 Report Share Posted July 7, 2014 What about rivers and lakes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted July 7, 2014 Report Share Posted July 7, 2014 www.cnn.com/.../west-texas-fertilizer-pla.. is the link to the aforementioned article. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted July 7, 2014 Report Share Posted July 7, 2014 OH My. Www.chronicle.com. article to follow Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EnlightenedChosenOne Posted July 7, 2014 Author Report Share Posted July 7, 2014 TttObviously Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TROJANSWIN Posted July 7, 2014 Report Share Posted July 7, 2014 What about rivers and lakes Yes, the new factory made cows burp after drinking from rivers and lakes! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted July 7, 2014 Report Share Posted July 7, 2014 A lake caught on fire 13 times because it was so polluted. That is why the EPA was started. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted July 7, 2014 Report Share Posted July 7, 2014 I wish someone would google the meaning of copyright infringement and plagiarism and explain it to me. I do not understand how it is copyright infringement if I am not mass distributing the articles. I also give the author credit which means it is not plagiarism. Geez Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted July 7, 2014 Report Share Posted July 7, 2014 Read my links. The plant blowing up was not a chain of random acts of nature. It was negligence. The second link explains how the democrats have tried to create laws that would call for tighter regulation of the industry. The republicans are opposed of course. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted July 7, 2014 Report Share Posted July 7, 2014 Cuyahoga River - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuyahoga_River. This is the river that caught on fire 13 times. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TROJANSWIN Posted July 7, 2014 Report Share Posted July 7, 2014 Read my links. The plant blowing up was not a chain of random acts of nature. It was negligence. The second link explains how the democrats have tried to create laws that would call for tighter regulation of the industry. The republicans are opposed of course. I never said it was a random act of nature. Like I previously explained to you, when you mix certain chemicals, they become explosive. Then one accident or mistake can cause a big problem. Do you think the people that were killed in that explosion wanted it to happen? What regulation or how many regulations are needed to keep any accident from ever happening again? It is not possible to keep every imaginable problem from ever happening without making each and every living thing on this planet stop moving. You can add as many regulations as you want and something will still go wrong or something will still be affected. However, adding more unnecessary regulations in the hopes of solving all the problems won't stop the problems, but it will cause supply problems, which in turn will cause price increases. When the price of food goes up because fertilizer costs more, who do you think suffers the most, the millionaire politician or the middle class worker trying to feed their family? I guess I just want dirty air and water so that I don't feel so bad when I push grandma off the cliff! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenash Posted July 7, 2014 Report Share Posted July 7, 2014 Big GIrl- every time something goes wrong in this country, your crowd believes the only way to deal with it is to create another government agency after passing more laws/regulations. Perhaps ( and that's a very big perhaps) it is well intentioned but with the economy still flailing, why would someone want to start a business in this country when they will have to pay taxes at a rate 10 percentage higher than most of the rest of the world and also have to contend with Obamacare and to wait for an 18 month environmental impact study? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenash Posted July 7, 2014 Report Share Posted July 7, 2014 Seven people die each day ( this is an average, so don't get bent out of shape) in reported U.S. home fires. Does that mean we need a law/regulation mandating that all homes be built out of asbestos? In 2012 92 people per day were killed in auto accidents. Do we need a law that bans the automobile? I am sure you know that a number of people have died waiting too long on appointments with the VA ( yes, the 21st Century VA promised by Obama) Should we do away with the VA? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted July 8, 2014 Report Share Posted July 8, 2014 Who talked about banning anything houses have to be built to code as well as automobiles Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted July 8, 2014 Report Share Posted July 8, 2014 Rivers should not be catching on fire. That is a great concern of mine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenash Posted July 8, 2014 Report Share Posted July 8, 2014 Sure they have to be built to code but that hasn't stopped them causing many more deaths than polluted rivers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.