smitty Posted July 31, 2014 Report Posted July 31, 2014 From the article: "Do you believe that the five male justices truly understood the ramifications of their decision?" Couric asked Ginsburg of the 5-4 Hobby Lobby ruling, which cleared the way for employers to deny insurance coverage of contraceptives to female workers on religious grounds. "I would have to say no," the 81-year-old justice replied. Asked if the five justices revealed a "blind spot" in their decision, Ginsburg said yes." This is a prime example why liberals should not be in charge. What she is telling us here is that the law doesn't matter. What she is saying is what these men on the court should be doing is social engineering. They have a "blind spot" as for as women issues are concerned. She's saying they should rule what she thinks is important and NOT what the law says about it. This also is what happened on the Roe V. Wade. They ruled on how they "felt" and not about the Constitution. One will find no "right" to an abortion in the Constitution! http://news.yahoo.com/katie-couric-interviews-ruth-bader-ginsburg-185027624.html jv_coach 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.