Jump to content

Underfunded Pension Plans- what should be done?


stevenash

Recommended Posts

Steve, the answer is simple.  Stop the pensions and go to a 401-K with some sort of a match by the local entities.  Private business' have realized these pensions are not sustainable.  Therefore, they had gone to 401-K's.  Same philosophy should go to the public entities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While "tactically shifting a portfolio " sounds very good, it is much easier said than done. Often, the "tacticians" are no better than the non tacticians when it comes to managing money. Most of the time, the markets recognize the shifting economic environment well ahead of the tacticians who, as a result, are unable to take advantage of the shifts. One need look no further than at the number of sophisticated hedge funds that have gone bust - they were supposedly armed with the most brilliant of tacticians. Additionally, in years such as 2007-2009, it didnt matter where you shifted the money, because, other than cash, there was no place to hide. All sectors got hammered.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The answer should be simple, but it is not. I work for a company that has reduced my pension and eliminated it for new hires. While I understand this from a business perspective, you also have to look at this from a retirees point of view. Many of these employees spent the better part of a lifetime earning this pension. To give them anything less than what was promised is criminal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree- the promises ought to be honored. At the same time, one of the problems is that promises are made without sufficient analysis of the resources necessary to fulfill those promises long term. The federal government is particularly guilty in such instances.

You said a mouthful there!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's actually pretty easy, but politics (as usual) gets in the way.

While "tactically shifting a portfolio " sounds very good, it is much easier said than done. Often, the "tacticians" are no better than the non tacticians when it comes to managing money. Most of the time, the markets recognize the shifting economic environment well ahead of the tacticians who, as a result, are unable to take advantage of the shifts. One need look no further than at the number of sophisticated hedge funds that have gone bust - they were supposedly armed with the most brilliant of tacticians. Additionally, in years such as 2007-2009, it didnt matter where you shifted the money, because, other than cash, there was no place to hide. All sectors got hammered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Such is capitalism

The answer should be simple, but it is not. I work for a company that has reduced my pension and eliminated it for new hires. While I understand this from a business perspective, you also have to look at this from a retirees point of view. Many of these employees spent the better part of a lifetime earning this pension. To give them anything less than what was promised is criminal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,178
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    PostDigTD1
    Newest Member
    PostDigTD1
    Joined


×
×
  • Create New...