SKINS Posted September 20, 2014 Report Share Posted September 20, 2014 I read that ISIS has about 3000 members, are you saying that they will try to invade a Super Power? (If those numbers are correct ) You read wrong, not to mention ISIL has had more success recruiting and indoctrinating people from around the globe than any other terrorist organization. What we don't want is another, but much more powerful Hama's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baddog Posted September 20, 2014 Report Share Posted September 20, 2014 what freedoms would you and I obtain if troops are placed in Iraq? Freedoms to be obtained?? All wars have protected the freedoms we have as Americans. You really live in left field. Your thought patterns and your inability to reason make me wonder exactly what we are considering "educated" anymore. Do you remember 9/11. You learned nothing from that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Buddy Garrity Posted September 21, 2014 Report Share Posted September 21, 2014 The KKK is the past? ..............please.its still in existence, alive and well in some states. I hope they crumble just the same as I hope ISIS crumbles. Big girl 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted September 21, 2014 Report Share Posted September 21, 2014 Freedoms to be obtained?? All wars have protected the freedoms we have as Americans. You really live in left field. Your thought patterns and your inability to reason make me wonder exactly what we are considering "educated" anymore. Do you remember 9/11. You learned nothing from that? name the freedoms. My power of reasoning is not that good.How will our troops stop a terrorist attack if they go to Iraq?. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted September 21, 2014 Report Share Posted September 21, 2014 You read wrong, not to mention ISIL has had more success recruiting and indoctrinating people from around the globe than any other terrorist organization. What we don't want is another, but much more powerful Hama's. how many people do they have? Do they have enough to start a conventional war with the USA? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baddog Posted September 21, 2014 Report Share Posted September 21, 2014 name the freedoms. My power of reasoning is not that good.How will our troops stop a terrorist attack if they go to Iraq?. Big girl. You are a waste of time. You have absolutely no insight or the ability to process information. There are no guarantees of stopping a terrorist attack on our own soil but we dramatically improve our chances of it not happening by taking out their leaders abroad. Plus, the Turks are our allies. Don't you stand up and fight for your friends? PN-G bamatex 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted September 21, 2014 Report Share Posted September 21, 2014 Big girl. You are a waste of time. You have absolutely no insight or the ability to process information. There are no guarantees of stopping a terrorist attack on our own soil but we dramatically improve our chances of it not happening by taking out their leaders abroad. Plus, the Turks are our allies. Don't you stand up and fight for your friends? sooo.you dont have a legitimate reason so you resort to insults. Smh. You are saying that we should send troops to die so that they can stop a terror attack that MIGHT happen? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted September 21, 2014 Report Share Posted September 21, 2014 Big girl. You are a waste of time. You have absolutely no insight or the ability to process information. There are no guarantees of stopping a terrorist attack on our own soil but we dramatically improve our chances of it not happening by taking out their leaders abroad. Plus, the Turks are our allies. Don't you stand up and fight for your friends?tt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted September 21, 2014 Report Share Posted September 21, 2014 Cant special ops be sent to take out their leaders? They took out Bin Laden and there were not any American casualties. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smitty Posted September 21, 2014 Report Share Posted September 21, 2014 how would you feel if one of your relatives had to go to Iraq, would you be singing a different tune? If it was to defend your kin from getting their heads cut off, I would not have a problem. ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenash Posted September 21, 2014 Report Share Posted September 21, 2014 Big Girl- Are you familiar with the following names? Nidal Hassan, Carlos Bledsoe, William Long, Fasal Shazad, Tsarnaev Brothers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baddog Posted September 21, 2014 Report Share Posted September 21, 2014 sooo.you dont have a legitimate reason so you resort to insults. Smh. You are saying that we should send troops to die so that they can stop a terror attack that MIGHT happen? Cant special ops be sent to take out their leaders? They took out Bin Laden and there were not any American casualties. sooo.you dont have a legitimate reason so you resort to insults. Smh. You are saying that we should send troops to die so that they can stop a terror attack that MIGHT happen? That was no insult. Just stating the obvious. There is a certain level of intelligence required to know when one has been insulted. Now that was an insult. Cant special ops be sent to take out their leaders? They took out Bin Laden and there were not any American casualties. Cant special ops be sent to take out their leaders? They took out Bin Laden and there were not any American casualties. Need I say more? Special ops don't get killed? The very same team you are referring to (seal team 6) was shot down in a helicopter days after killing Bin Laden. All on board were killed. You do realize that if men had not given their lives in war that you would not exist? Painful to think about I know, but true just the same. It's the reason behind Memorial Day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted September 21, 2014 Report Share Posted September 21, 2014 If it was to defend your kin from getting their heads cut off, I would not have a problem. ;) that is b.s.and you know it. You would send your son or daughter to potentially be slaughtered so that you stop a beheading that might occur? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted September 21, 2014 Report Share Posted September 21, 2014 Tt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted September 21, 2014 Report Share Posted September 21, 2014 Tt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eagle11 Posted September 21, 2014 Report Share Posted September 21, 2014 She is googling them right now Nash......she will get back to you with what others tell her to do. Would I send troops over there? Absolutely yes. I would send more than what we need to kill every person wearing one of those ISIS flags. Be it 3,000 or 30,000. If twice that are killed in collateral damage so be it. Mosques, community buildings......everything is fair game. End this crap before they can grow, organize and do more damage. But our Blunder in Chief will send more troops to fight ebola than fight a group that wants nothing more than to kill every American that they can. Once we get this sorted out we watch tv......., 3rd world, dog and cat eating country that burns US flags and complains about what we did, we cut off funding to them that day. If we cut off funding to countries that want to do us harm we would probably pay for this little excursion. I am through responding ...........Nash, you do the light work please baddog 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted September 21, 2014 Report Share Posted September 21, 2014 That was no insult. Just stating the obvious. There is a certain level of intelligence required to know when one has been insulted. Now that was an insult. Need I say more? Special ops don't get killed? The very same team you are referring to (seal team 6) was shot down in a helicopter days after killing Bin Laden. All on board were killed. You do realize that if men had not given their lives in war that you would not exist? Painful to think about I know, but true just the same. It's the reason behind Memorial Day. what freedoms will we gain or retain if troops are sent to Iraq? I want to know in detail, because I am so dumb. I totally get that I wouldn't have the freedoms I have if we did not have conventional wars. I totally get the World Wars etc. Big girl 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted September 21, 2014 Report Share Posted September 21, 2014 (edited) She is googling them right now Nash......she will get back to you with what others tell her to do. Would I send troops over there? Absolutely yes. I would send more than what we need to kill every person wearing one of those ISIS flags. Be it 3,000 or 30,000. If twice that are killed in collateral damage so be it. Mosques, community buildings......everything is fair game. End this crap before they can grow, organize and do more damage. But our Blunder in Chief will send more troops to fight ebola than fight a group that wants nothing more than to kill every American that they can. Once we get this sorted out we watch tv....... 3rd world, dog and cat eating country that burns US flags and complains about what we did, we cut off funding to them that day. If we cut off funding to countries that want to do us harm we would probably pay for this little excursion. I am through responding ........Nash, you do the light work please would you be willing to go to Iraq? If so , there is a special number you can call to volunteer. *Mod Edit - no profanity * Edited September 22, 2014 by tvc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenash Posted September 21, 2014 Report Share Posted September 21, 2014 Hmmmm- who was very recently complaining about somebody resorting to personal insults? Pot calling kettle? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baddog Posted September 21, 2014 Report Share Posted September 21, 2014 Big Girl, I have a solution to our problem. My goals in the middle east will be met and not one soldier will have to perish. I'll let you figure that one out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SKINS Posted September 21, 2014 Report Share Posted September 21, 2014 how many people do they have? Do they have enough to start a conventional war with the USA? Define conventional war. Give them two years and they could easily control all if Iraq and the Levant, as well as north east africa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted September 21, 2014 Report Share Posted September 21, 2014 Our mission in Iraq the first time worked great. Yeah right. Why should we send more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thetragichippy Posted September 21, 2014 Report Share Posted September 21, 2014 its still in existence, alive and well in some states. I hope they crumble just the same as I hope ISIS crumbles. It is estimated to have between 5,000 and 8,000 members as of 2012. So, between 96-138 members per state. (check it out) There message is A LOT less violent than The New Black Panther Party, and to compare to ISIS is a joke. I personally think all these groups are stupid and not needed, but you can't call out one without calling them all out........ Unless Tobie has an agenda...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PN-G bamatex Posted September 21, 2014 Author Report Share Posted September 21, 2014 The Tuskegee Institute estimates that the KKK has been responsible for the deaths of approximately 2,000 people total in its entire 150 year history. Al Qaeda, from which the much more powerful, dangerous and murderous ISIS is derived, killed 2,996 in 102 minutes during an attack you could see from space. To call both organizations horrid would be accurate. To call them comparable would be asinine. Due to the obvious dissimilarity between the natures, ideologies, and destructive capacities of the two organizations, and the immediacy of the threat presented by ISIS as opposed to the defunct state of the KKK, I see no way that the KKK can be considered relevant to the topic of this thread. Moving on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
5GallonBucket Posted September 22, 2014 Report Share Posted September 22, 2014 hurry up NOVEMBER. thetragichippy 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts