Richmond Foster 17 West Orange-Stark 14/Final

[griff]

When WO-S was in the local district with my team, why didn't WO-S make the playoffs and my team did both years?

 

"Both" years? That's a short-sided perspective on history. These two teams shared a district for many other years than the ones you refer to. 

[TxHoops]

what is the all time record anyway?

Don't know. I found a site (lone star football I think) that had most of the years schedules, but had a few years omitted. Saw a couple of games central won, but there could have been more. It was 8-2 or 8-3 in WOS favor of the games it had.

[WOSgrad]

what is the all time record anyway?

Here are the results of games:

 

1988 - Central 24, WO-S 21

1989 - WO-S 47, Central 33

1994 - WO-S 20, Central 7

1995 - Central 10, WO-S 7

1996 - WO-S 30, Central 15

1997 - WO-S 19, Central 13

2000 - WO-S 22, Central 7

(an interesting side note to this game, WO-S and Central were in the same district and WO-S played in the 4A-II state championship game, so suffice it to say they did make the playoffs while WO-S and Central played in the same district)

2001 - WO-S 35, Central 21

2002 - WO-S 17, Central 7

2003 - Central 16, WO-S 14

2004 - WO-S 44, Central 0

2005 - WO-S 28, Central 12

2012 - WO-S 14, Central 0

2013 - WO-S 31, Central 7

 

I think that makes the series record (if you do the math) at 11-3.

 

That is a whole lot of astericks that need to be placed on this series record.   By the way, the largest margin of victory for Central in this series, 3 points.  The smallest margin of victory for WO-S, 6 points.

 

The thought that any coach in this area would "not want to beat his kids" (is my math correct?) on the other team is laughable.

 

So much for this "no excuses" montra.

[TxHoops]

Here are the results of games:

1988 - Central 24, WO-S 21
1989 - WO-S 47, Central 33
1994 - WO-S 20, Central 7
1995 - Central 10, WO-S 7
1996 - WO-S 30, Central 15
1997 - WO-S 19, Central 13
2000 - WO-S 22, Central 7
(an interesting side note to this game, WO-S and Central were in the same district and WO-S played in the 4A-II state championship game, so suffice it to say they did make the playoffs while WO-S and Central played in the same district)
2001 - WO-S 35, Central 21
2002 - WO-S 17, Central 7
2003 - Central 16, WO-S 14
2004 - WO-S 44, Central 0
2005 - WO-S 28, Central 12
2012 - WO-S 14, Central 0
2013 - WO-S 31, Central 7

That is a whole lot of astericks that need to be placed on this series record. By the way, the largest margin of victory for Central in this series, 3 points. The smallest margin of victory for WO-S, 6 points.

So much for no excuses. The thought that any coach in this area would "not want to beat his kids" (is my math correct?) on the other team is laughable.

Thank you! I should have just waited on you!

[wo-s#1]

Here are the results of games:

1988 - Central 24, WO-S 21
1989 - WO-S 47, Central 33
1994 - WO-S 20, Central 7
1995 - Central 10, WO-S 7
1996 - WO-S 30, Central 15
1997 - WO-S 19, Central 13
2000 - WO-S 22, Central 7
(an interesting side note to this game, WO-S and Central were in the same district and WO-S played in the 4A-II state championship game, so suffice it to say they did make the playoffs while WO-S and Central played in the same district)
2001 - WO-S 35, Central 21
2002 - WO-S 17, Central 7
2003 - Central 16, WO-S 14
2004 - WO-S 44, Central 0
2005 - WO-S 28, Central 12
2012 - WO-S 14, Central 0
2013 - WO-S 31, Central 7

I think that makes the series record (if you do the math) at 11-3.

That is a whole lot of astericks that need to be placed on this series record. By the way, the largest margin of victory for Central in this series, 3 points. The smallest margin of victory for WO-S, 6 points.

The thought that any coach in this area would "not want to beat his kids" (is my math correct?) on the other team is laughable.

So much for this "no excuses" montra.

thought it was something like this and we were in the same district majority of the years right?

[wo-s#1]

Just found it on the woccisd website NOBODY in this area has a winning record against the stangs

[WOSgrad]

thought it was something like this and we were in the same district majority of the years right?

No, WO-S and Central were only in the same district for 4 years in the series, 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003.  As you can see, by doing the math, that WO-S was 3-1

[wo-s#1]

Westbrook closest at 5-5 ce king,lamarque ,and friendswood only teams played more than once that lead us we have a lot of 0-1 Gilmer,carthage,wimberly etc

[BMTSoulja1]

How are you not being disrespectful? You are accusing the man of possibly "throwing" a game.

Take the high road? That is laughable coming from a guy who is suggesting a local coach threw a game against his former team.

I am sorry, I am not going to let this pass. You make those kind of accusations, you deserve any flack coming your way.

No need to shut up about it now.

Naw, no need. Selective comprehension at it's best. I'd get a better response from an empty trash can...

[One4All]

Here are the results of games:

1988 - Central 24, WO-S 21
1989 - WO-S 47, Central 33
1994 - WO-S 20, Central 7
1995 - Central 10, WO-S 7
1996 - WO-S 30, Central 15
1997 - WO-S 19, Central 13
2000 - WO-S 22, Central 7
(an interesting side note to this game, WO-S and Central were in the same district and WO-S played in the 4A-II state championship game, so suffice it to say they did make the playoffs while WO-S and Central played in the same district)
2001 - WO-S 35, Central 21
2002 - WO-S 17, Central 7
2003 - Central 16, WO-S 14
2004 - WO-S 44, Central 0
2005 - WO-S 28, Central 12
2012 - WO-S 14, Central 0
2013 - WO-S 31, Central 7

I think that makes the series record (if you do the math) at 11-3.

That is a whole lot of astericks that need to be placed on this series record. By the way, the largest margin of victory for Central in this series, 3 points. The smallest margin of victory for WO-S, 6 points.

The thought that any coach in this area would "not want to beat his kids" (is my math correct?) on the other team is laughable.

So much for this "no excuses" montra.

Say it All....+1

[AggiesAreWe]

Naw, no need. Selective comprehension at it's best. I'd get a better response from an empty trash can...

 

Sometimes it's hard for an educated person to comprehend stupidity. ;) :rolleyes:

 

I'd rather be an empty garbage can than one who is obviously full of garbage and over flowing. ;)

[Mr. Buddy Garrity]

Central wasnt in the 4A district with WOS in 2000 or 01. Lincoln and TJ was, I know, I graduated in 01.

[BMTSoulja1]

Here are the results of games:

1988 - Central 24, WO-S 21
1989 - WO-S 47, Central 33
1994 - WO-S 20, Central 7
1995 - Central 10, WO-S 7
1996 - WO-S 30, Central 15
1997 - WO-S 19, Central 13
2000 - WO-S 22, Central 7
(an interesting side note to this game, WO-S and Central were in the same district and WO-S played in the 4A-II state championship game, so suffice it to say they did make the playoffs while WO-S and Central played in the same district)
2001 - WO-S 35, Central 21
2002 - WO-S 17, Central 7
2003 - Central 16, WO-S 14
2004 - WO-S 44, Central 0
2005 - WO-S 28, Central 12
2012 - WO-S 14, Central 0
2013 - WO-S 31, Central 7

I think that makes the series record (if you do the math) at 11-3.

That is a whole lot of astericks that need to be placed on this series record. By the way, the largest margin of victory for Central in this series, 3 points. The smallest margin of victory for WO-S, 6 points.

The thought that any coach in this area would "not want to beat his kids" (is my math correct?) on the other team is laughable.

So much for this "no excuses" montra.

I for one didn't ask about that kind of history (that far back) nor did I give an excuse for thoae losses. I simply game my opinion on last year's game. It was another guy that asked about all of that deep history. I did, however, ask about WO-S playoff appearances when both of them were in the same district before the 'stangs dropped in classification.

[BMTSoulja1]

Sometimes it's hard for an educated person to comprehend stupidity. ;) :rolleyes:

I'd rather be an empty garbage can than one who is obviously full of garbage and over flowing. ;)

. And empty and hollow trash can that echoes on the inside when speaking into it. Yep, that about sums it up.

[WOSgrad]

The site that I originally consulted incorrectly had WO-S and Central in the same district, so I guess that makes their record 1-1 in those two years.  In the other years, Central was a classification higher that WO-S and WO-S was 10-2 in those games.

 

Still a whole bunch of astericks to mete out.

 

So much for no excuses.

[AggiesAreWe]

. And empty and hollow trash can that echoes on the inside when speaking into it. Yep, that about sums it up.

 

You suggesting a garbage can wreaking and overflowing with garbage is better than an empty garbage can?

 

Okay, that about sums it up.

[rykerx144]

ding ding....  now back to your corners

[AggiesAreWe]

ding ding....  now back to your corners

 

Nope. Nothing about this has any sanctions. He is accusing a local coach of throwing a game. No timeouts or rules as far as I am concerned.

 

If Soulja is going to be disrespectful to a coach in that manner, then he gets no respect.

[BMTSoulja1]

I thought those two were in the same district in 2000.

Soulja doesn't even know when his own team dropped in classification yet believes a coach threw a game. ;) :rolleyes:

We were in the same district was north shore in the Fall of 2001. The next year, (2002), we were thrown into 4a where we started playing the local teams.

See there, there is silly and stupid post #1 from you.

[WOSgrad]

Oh so now the other games need to be astericked because they happened in the past.

 

But to answer your question, WO-S was in a three way tie for second place with Central and Nederland in 2002 with Central and Nederland advancing with the positive points formula as you see all of the teams were 1-1 against each other (with WO-S giving Central their loss amongst the 3).  Unfortunately, Nederland smoked WO-S that year, which left WO-S out in the cold.

 

In 2003, WO-S was again in the 3 way tie with Central and Nederland. But that year they lost to both of them. So again, they stayed home.

 

No results, but no excuses.

[AggiesAreWe]

I was wrong. Man enough to admit it. I was going off the info that Todd had provided but now has been proven by himself to be inaccurate.

 

I don't consider that to be the same as making a stupid accusation but still the same as that I was wrong.

[BMTSoulja1]

Nope. Nothing about this has any sanctions. He is accusing a local coach of throwing a game. No timeouts or rules as far as I am concerned.

If Soulja is going to be disrespectful to a coach in that manner, then he gets no respect.

Disrepectful to a coach I give nothing but praise to for bringing us back to respectability? How stupid was THAT comment? All I said was last year it was a conflict of interest and now we don't have to worry about it anymore. Educated mind or a dummy should be able to comprehend that.

[BMTSoulja1]

Oh so now the other games need to be astericked because they happened in the past.

But to answer your question, WO-S was in a three way tie for second place with Central and Nederland in 2002 with Central and Nederland advancing with the positive points formula as you see all of the teams were 1-1 against each other (with WO-S giving Central their loss amongst the 3). Unfortunately, Nederland smoked WO-S that year, which left WO-S out in the cold.

In 2003, WO-S was again in the 3 way tie with Central and Nederland. But that year they lost to both of them. So again, they stayed home.

No results, but no excuses.

I understand what your saying, my man, but the end result is they stayed home and we went.

[BMTSoulja1]

I was wrong. Man enough to admit it. I was going off the info that Todd had provided but now has been proven by himself to be inaccurate.

I don't consider that to be the same as making a stupid accusation but still the same as that I was wrong.

B) B)

[AggiesAreWe]

Disrepectful to a coach I give nothing but praise to for bringing us back to respectability? How stupid was THAT comment? All I said was last year it was a conflict of interest and now we don't have to worry about it anymore. Educated mind or a dummy should be able to comprehend that.

 

Robert, I am not the only one here seeing through your "conflict of interest" comment. Everyone knows what you are saying. Doesn't take a smart person to figure that out.

 

But to enlighten us "dumb" folks, explain what you mean by "conflict of interest" in regards to his intentions of that game.