bullets13 Posted November 21, 2014 Report Posted November 21, 2014 I find it highly unlikely that he just happened to decide he was gonna go out and shoot a black kid after 6 years of spotless service for the ferguson police force. Brown had just committed a felony, which could explain why he might attack a police officer. Also, im curious why so little media coverage has been given to the fact that Wilson received a broken orbital bone in the altercation that "didn't happen" according to some. Quote
tvc184 Posted November 21, 2014 Report Posted November 21, 2014 I think this was nothing more than a police officer on patrol doing his job. He stopped a couple of guys for blocking traffic and knew nothing in the first moments about any robbery. He was brutally attacked, the attackers started to flee and then one came back maybe to finish the officer off and the officer had to defend himself. It seems like a pretty clear cut justified use of deadly force. For some reasons, a few facts were taken out of context (probably with intent) and used as evidence of wrongdoing. It is like reading a couple of words out of a statement. You can read the Gettysburg Address by Lincoln and see the words, "our poor power" and "died in vain", making it look like an apology and degrading the armies when in truth it was just the opposite. I think the same thing was done here. You see independent issues that are not linked together in a totality of circumstances based on facts. Instead of the true picture you get blurbs like "unarmed" and "arms up". Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.